Alveolar Ridge Split on Horizontal Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review

被引:46
|
作者
Elnayef, Basel [1 ]
Monje, Alberto [2 ]
Lin, Guo-Hao [2 ]
Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi [1 ]
Chan, Hsun-Liang [1 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [2 ]
Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Oral Surg & Implantol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
alveolar ridge augmentation; bone regeneration; dental implants; osteotomy; systematic review; treatment outcome; IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT; ANORGANIC BOVINE BONE; EXPANSION TECHNIQUE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; MANDIBULAR RIDGE; CREST TECHNIQUE; BLOCK GRAFTS; FOLLOW-UP; MAXILLARY; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.4051
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Many techniques have been proposed to overcome the limitations displayed by maxillary atrophy. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the predictability, dimensional changes, and associated factors to successfully perform the alveolar ridge split (ARS) technique of augmentation. Materials and Methods: An electronic and manual literature searches was conducted by two independent reviewers in several databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles written in English up to February 2014. A manual search was also performed to ensure a thorough screening process. Based on the PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) model, the chief question of this study was: Can patients with horizontal ridge deficiency be successfully treated with the ARS technique and implant therapy? Results: Overall, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria, and a subsequent meta-analysis was performed. A Cohen kappa interagreement rate of 0.82 was reached. The implant survival rate of the included studies was 97.0% (range, 94.4% to 100%) with the full-thickness flap (FTF) approach and 95.7% (range, 86.6% to 100%) with the partial-thickness flap (PTF) approach. The weighted mean (WM) of horizontal bone width gain was calculated for included studies using FTF for the ARS technique. Four studies that had data were included in the meta-analysis. The WM +/- standard deviation of bone width gain was 3.19 +/- 1.19 mm (range, 2.00 to 4.03 mm). For studies using PTF for ARS, only one study provided mean and standard deviation of horizontal bone width gain (4.13 +/- 3.13 mm); hence, meta-analysis could not be performed. Buccal wall fracture represented the most frequent postoperative complication, followed by postoperative ridge resorption. Conclusion: In selected scenarios, the ARS technique might represent a predictable approach as demonstrated by a high implant survival rate, adequate horizontal bone gain, and minimal intra-and postoperative complications. Further research is needed to determine the influence of the grafting materials inserted and flap tissue biotype, as well as the anatomical characteristics on final bone augmentation outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 606
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Complex Bone Augmentation in Alveolar Ridge Defects
    Herford, Alan S.
    Nguyen, Katina
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 27 (02) : 227 - +
  • [22] Preparation of allogeneic bone for alveolar ridge augmentation
    Krasny, Kornel
    Kaminski, Artur
    Krasny, Marta
    Czech, Tomasz
    Wojtowicz, Andrzej
    CELL AND TISSUE BANKING, 2017, 18 (03) : 313 - 321
  • [23] Extensive augmentation of the alveolar ridge using autogenous calvarial split bone grafts for dental rehabilitation
    Iizuka, T
    Smolka, W
    Hallermann, W
    Mericske-Stern, R
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (05) : 607 - 615
  • [24] Assessment of the potential of growth factors for localized alveolar ridge augmentation: a systematic review
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 35 : 255 - 281
  • [25] The efficacy of alveolar ridge split on implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lin, Yuanyou
    Li, Guanlin
    Xu, Tingxiang
    Zhou, Xuexiao
    Luo, Feng
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [26] The efficacy of alveolar ridge split on implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yuanyou Lin
    Guanlin Li
    Tingxiang Xu
    Xuexiao Zhou
    Feng Luo
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [27] Application of modified alveolar ridge augmentation technique for horizontal bone augmentation in posterior mandibular region: Report of 3 cases
    Chu, Shunli
    Xu, Hongwei
    Li, Xianjing
    Guo, Tianqi
    Ting, Zhu
    Zhou, Yanmin
    CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2019, 7 (12): : 2548 - 2564
  • [28] Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh and autogenous bone
    Sumi, Y
    Miyaishi, O
    Tohnai, I
    Ueda, M
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2000, 89 (03): : 268 - 270
  • [29] Alveolar ridge augmentation with the perforated and nonperforated bone grafts
    de Avila, Erica Dorigatti
    Scarso Filho, Jose
    de Oliveira Ramalho, Lizete Toledo
    Real Gabrielli, Mario Francisco
    Pereira Filho, Valfrido Antonio
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2014, 44 (01): : 33 - 38
  • [30] Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: Bone Regeneration Instead of Reparation
    Jopp, S.
    Schuckert, K. -H.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2009, 15 (05) : O13 - O13