Alveolar Ridge Split on Horizontal Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review

被引:46
|
作者
Elnayef, Basel [1 ]
Monje, Alberto [2 ]
Lin, Guo-Hao [2 ]
Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi [1 ]
Chan, Hsun-Liang [1 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [2 ]
Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Oral Surg & Implantol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
alveolar ridge augmentation; bone regeneration; dental implants; osteotomy; systematic review; treatment outcome; IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT; ANORGANIC BOVINE BONE; EXPANSION TECHNIQUE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; MANDIBULAR RIDGE; CREST TECHNIQUE; BLOCK GRAFTS; FOLLOW-UP; MAXILLARY; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.4051
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Many techniques have been proposed to overcome the limitations displayed by maxillary atrophy. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the predictability, dimensional changes, and associated factors to successfully perform the alveolar ridge split (ARS) technique of augmentation. Materials and Methods: An electronic and manual literature searches was conducted by two independent reviewers in several databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles written in English up to February 2014. A manual search was also performed to ensure a thorough screening process. Based on the PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) model, the chief question of this study was: Can patients with horizontal ridge deficiency be successfully treated with the ARS technique and implant therapy? Results: Overall, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria, and a subsequent meta-analysis was performed. A Cohen kappa interagreement rate of 0.82 was reached. The implant survival rate of the included studies was 97.0% (range, 94.4% to 100%) with the full-thickness flap (FTF) approach and 95.7% (range, 86.6% to 100%) with the partial-thickness flap (PTF) approach. The weighted mean (WM) of horizontal bone width gain was calculated for included studies using FTF for the ARS technique. Four studies that had data were included in the meta-analysis. The WM +/- standard deviation of bone width gain was 3.19 +/- 1.19 mm (range, 2.00 to 4.03 mm). For studies using PTF for ARS, only one study provided mean and standard deviation of horizontal bone width gain (4.13 +/- 3.13 mm); hence, meta-analysis could not be performed. Buccal wall fracture represented the most frequent postoperative complication, followed by postoperative ridge resorption. Conclusion: In selected scenarios, the ARS technique might represent a predictable approach as demonstrated by a high implant survival rate, adequate horizontal bone gain, and minimal intra-and postoperative complications. Further research is needed to determine the influence of the grafting materials inserted and flap tissue biotype, as well as the anatomical characteristics on final bone augmentation outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 606
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Clinical efficacy of grafting materials in alveolar ridge augmentation: A systematic reviewClinical efficacy of grafting materials in alveolar ridge augmentation: A systematic review
    Troeltzsch, Markus
    Troeltzsch, Matthias
    Kauffmann, Philipp
    Gruber, Rudolph
    Brockmeyer, Phillipp
    Moser, Norman
    Rau, Anna
    Schliephake, Henning
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 44 (10) : 1618 - 1629
  • [12] Bone Augmentation Techniques for Horizontal and Vertical Alveolar Ridge Deficiency in Oral Implantology
    Tolstunov, Len
    Hamrick, John F. Eric
    Broumand, Vishtasb
    Shilo, Dekel
    Rachmiel, Adi
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 31 (02) : 163 - +
  • [13] Alveolar Bone Ridge Augmentation Using Polymeric Membranes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Toledano-Osorio, Manuel
    Toledano, Manuel
    Manzano-Moreno, Francisco Javier
    Vallecillo, Cristina
    Vallecillo-Rivas, Marta
    Rodriguez-Archilla, Alberto
    Osorio, Raquel
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [14] A novel approach for horizontal augmentation with split box: A method that combines split bone block and ridge split techniques
    Dergin, Guhan
    Can, Sinem Busra kirac
    Can, Serhat
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 125 (06)
  • [15] Changes in the volume and density of calvarial split bone grafts after alveolar ridge augmentation
    Smolka, W
    Eggensperger, N
    Carollo, V
    Ozdoba, C
    Iizuka, T
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (02) : 149 - 155
  • [16] Tooth shell versus bone shell technique for horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation
    Khaled Ahmed Ibrahim Awad
    Mohamed Abdel-Monem Tawik
    Mohamed Mohamed Hussein
    Shaimaa Ahmed Abo El-Farag
    Sally El Sayed Abdel Sameaa
    BMC Oral Health, 25 (1)
  • [17] Alveolar Ridge Augmentation using Customized Zirconia Membranes: A Systematic Review
    Albash, Ziad
    Khalil, Ali
    Kashkash, Wajih
    OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2024, 18
  • [18] The use of hydroxyapatite bone substitute grafting for alveolar ridge preservation, sinus augmentation, and periodontal bone defect: A systematic review
    Dewi, Anne Handrini
    Ana, Ika Dewi
    HELIYON, 2018, 4 (10):
  • [19] Simple Bone Augmentation for Alveolar Ridge Defects
    Haggerty, Christopher J.
    Vogel, Christopher T.
    Fisher, G. Rawleigh
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 27 (02) : 203 - +
  • [20] Preparation of allogeneic bone for alveolar ridge augmentation
    Kornel Krasny
    Artur Kamiński
    Marta Krasny
    Tomasz Czech
    Andrzej Wojtowicz
    Cell and Tissue Banking, 2017, 18 : 313 - 321