Alveolar Ridge Split on Horizontal Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review

被引:46
|
作者
Elnayef, Basel [1 ]
Monje, Alberto [2 ]
Lin, Guo-Hao [2 ]
Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi [1 ]
Chan, Hsun-Liang [1 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [2 ]
Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Oral Surg & Implantol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
alveolar ridge augmentation; bone regeneration; dental implants; osteotomy; systematic review; treatment outcome; IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT; ANORGANIC BOVINE BONE; EXPANSION TECHNIQUE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; MANDIBULAR RIDGE; CREST TECHNIQUE; BLOCK GRAFTS; FOLLOW-UP; MAXILLARY; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.4051
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Many techniques have been proposed to overcome the limitations displayed by maxillary atrophy. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the predictability, dimensional changes, and associated factors to successfully perform the alveolar ridge split (ARS) technique of augmentation. Materials and Methods: An electronic and manual literature searches was conducted by two independent reviewers in several databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles written in English up to February 2014. A manual search was also performed to ensure a thorough screening process. Based on the PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) model, the chief question of this study was: Can patients with horizontal ridge deficiency be successfully treated with the ARS technique and implant therapy? Results: Overall, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria, and a subsequent meta-analysis was performed. A Cohen kappa interagreement rate of 0.82 was reached. The implant survival rate of the included studies was 97.0% (range, 94.4% to 100%) with the full-thickness flap (FTF) approach and 95.7% (range, 86.6% to 100%) with the partial-thickness flap (PTF) approach. The weighted mean (WM) of horizontal bone width gain was calculated for included studies using FTF for the ARS technique. Four studies that had data were included in the meta-analysis. The WM +/- standard deviation of bone width gain was 3.19 +/- 1.19 mm (range, 2.00 to 4.03 mm). For studies using PTF for ARS, only one study provided mean and standard deviation of horizontal bone width gain (4.13 +/- 3.13 mm); hence, meta-analysis could not be performed. Buccal wall fracture represented the most frequent postoperative complication, followed by postoperative ridge resorption. Conclusion: In selected scenarios, the ARS technique might represent a predictable approach as demonstrated by a high implant survival rate, adequate horizontal bone gain, and minimal intra-and postoperative complications. Further research is needed to determine the influence of the grafting materials inserted and flap tissue biotype, as well as the anatomical characteristics on final bone augmentation outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 606
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bone expansion as a horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Azadi, Ali
    Hazrati, Parham
    Tizno, Ashkan
    Rezaei, Fatemeh
    Akbarzadeh Baghban, Alireza
    Tabrizi, Reza
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2025, 29 (01):
  • [2] Allogeneic Bone Onlay Grafts for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review
    Waasdorp, Jonathan
    Reynolds, Mark A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2010, 25 (03) : 525 - 531
  • [3] Horizontal ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone graft—systematic review
    Pedro Henrique de Azambuja Carvalho
    Guilherme dos Santos Trento
    Lucas Borin Moura
    Giovanni Cunha
    Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli
    Valfrido Antônio Pereira-Filho
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2019, 23 : 271 - 279
  • [4] Efficacy of Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Expansion Through the Alveolar Ridge Split Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Al Haydar, Bana
    Kang, Philip
    Momen-Heravi, Fatemeh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2023, 38 (06) : 1083 - +
  • [5] Human Studies of Vertical and Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Comparing Different Types of Bone Graft Materials: A Systematic Review
    Chavda, Suraj
    Levin, Liran
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2018, 44 (01) : 74 - 84
  • [6] Horizontal ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone graft-systematic review
    de Azambuja Carvalho, Pedro Henrique
    Trento, Guilherme dos Santos
    Moura, Lucas Borin
    Cunha, Giovanni
    Cabrini Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida
    Pereira-Filho, Valfrido Antonio
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2019, 23 (03): : 271 - 279
  • [7] RIDGE AUGMENTATION OF ALVEOLAR BONE
    SHIN, HK
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1988, 67 (04) : 740 - 740
  • [8] The Inlay Technique in Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review
    Barausse, Carlo
    Tayeb, Subhi
    Pellegrino, Gerardo
    Bonifazi, Lorenzo
    Mancuso, Edoardo
    Ratti, Stefano
    Galvani, Andrea
    Pistilli, Roberto
    Felice, Pietro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (05)
  • [9] Types of devices used in ridge split procedure for alveolar bone expansion: A systematic review
    Jha, Nayansi
    Choi, Eun Ha
    Kaushik, Nagendra Kumar
    Ryu, Jae Jun
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07):
  • [10] Horizontal ridge augmentation through ridge expansion via osseodensification, guided bone regeneration and ridge-split: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
    Vorovenci, Andrei
    Drafta, Sergiu
    Petre, Alexandru
    BIOMEDICAL REPORTS, 2024, 21 (04)