Evaluation of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus

被引:7
|
作者
Nishida, Tomoya [1 ]
Kojima, Takashi [1 ,2 ]
Kataoka, Takahiro [1 ]
Isogai, Naoki [1 ]
Yoshida, Yoko [1 ]
Nakamura, Tomoaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Eye Clin, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure; Corvis ST® Forme fruste keratoconus; Keratoconus; Scheimpflug camera; TRANSEPITHELIAL PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; CORNEAL RESPONSE PARAMETERS; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; CROSS-LINKING; THICKNESS; ANALYZER; HEALTHY;
D O I
10.1159/000506839
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Introduction: Although biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) is available, the effectiveness of intraocular pressure (IOP) correction in keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus (FFK) eyes has not been investigated. Objective: Evaluation of bIOP measurements in eyes with keratoconus and FFK. Methods: Forty-two eyes in 21 patients with keratoconus in one eye and FFK in the fellow eye were examined (KC/FFK group; mean age 24.62 +/- 8.6 years; 16 males and 5 females). The control group consisted of 62 eyes in 31 unaffected subjects (mean age 26.26 +/- 3.64 years; 15 males and 16 females). The bIOP was determined using a Scheimpflug-based tonometer (Corvis Scheimpflug Technology [Corvis ST (R)]) after measuring the IOP with a conventional non-contact tonometer (NIOP). The agreement between NIOP and bIOP values was examined using the Bland-Altman plot. The difference between NIOP and bIOP (bIOP correction amount) was compared between keratoconus and FFK eyes. Results: In the control group, there were no significant differences between right and left eyes in both NIOP and bIOP values (p = 0.975 and p = 0.224, respectively). In the KC/FFK group, NIOP values were significantly lower in the keratoconus eyes (9.93 +/- 1.96 mm Hg) than in the FFK eyes (12.23 +/- 3.03 mm Hg; p = 0.0003). There was no significant difference in bIOP values between the right and left eyes of the KC/FFK group (p = 0.168). The bIOP correction amount was significantly increased in keratoconus eyes (3.58 +/- 2.12 mm Hg) compared to in FFK eyes (1.80 +/- 3.32 mm Hg; p = 0.011). Conclusions: For eyes with keratoconus and FFK, the bIOP method is effective to adjust IOP measurements based on corneal biomechanical properties.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 549
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Agreement of Corrected Intraocular Pressure Values Between Corvis ST and Pentacam in Patients With Keratoconus, Subclinical Keratoconus, and Normal Cornea
    Chen, Yanhui
    Rong, Hua
    Liu, Wei
    Liu, Guihua
    Du, Bei
    Jin, Chengcheng
    Wei, Ruihua
    CORNEA, 2021, 40 (11) : 1426 - 1432
  • [42] Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients
    Muftuoglu, Orkun
    Ayar, Orhan
    Ozulken, Kemal
    Ozyol, Erhan
    Akinci, Arsen
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (09): : 1348 - 1357
  • [43] Early, Forme Fruste keratoconus and normal thin cornea, evaluation of sensitive parameters by combined Placido Scheimpflug topography
    Gharieb, Hesham Mohamed
    Abdelatif, Mona Kamal
    Gharieb, Hani Mohamed
    Othman, Ihab Saad
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 59 - 70
  • [44] The Role of Ocular Response Analyzer in Differentiation of Forme Fruste Keratoconus From Corneal Astigmatism
    Kirgiz, Ahmet
    Erdur, Sevil Karaman
    Atalay, Kursat
    Gurez, Ceren
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 45 (02): : 83 - 87
  • [45] Comparison of corneal shape and ocular aberrations in eyes with forme fruste keratoconus to that of normal cornea
    Ueki, Ryotaro
    Maeda, Naoyuki
    Fuchihata, Mutsumi
    Koh, Shizuka
    Kitaoka, Takashi
    Nishida, Kohji
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [46] Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Forme Fruste Keratoconus
    Luz, Allan
    Lopes, Bernardo
    Hallahan, Katie M.
    Valbon, Bruno
    Fontes, Bruno
    Schor, Paulo
    Dupps, William J., Jr.
    Ambrosio, Renato, Jr.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 164 : 14 - 21
  • [47] Development of unilateral corneal ectasia after PRK with ipsilateral preoperative forme fruste keratoconus
    Reznik, Jacob
    Salz, James J.
    Klimava, Alena
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 24 (08) : 843 - 847
  • [48] Assessment of Visual Quality in Eyes with Forme Fruste Keratoconus and Mild and Moderate Keratoconus Based on Optical Quality Analysis System II Parameters
    Ren, Zhonghao
    Xu, Liyan
    Fan, Qi
    Yang, Kaili
    Ren, Shengwei
    Zhao, Dongqing
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [49] The effects of changed biomechanical parameters on measurements of intraocular pressure in keratoconus patients
    Bohm, A
    Kohlhaas, M
    Lerche, RC
    Bischoff, B
    Richard, G
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 1997, 94 (11): : 771 - 774
  • [50] Combined Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Intrastromal Cross-linking in Forme fruste Keratoconus
    Lopez, Karla
    Pagano, Gabriela
    Navas, Alejandro
    Ramirez-Luquin, Tito
    Ramirez-Miranda, Arturo
    Graue-Hernandez, Enrique
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)