Evaluation of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus

被引:7
|
作者
Nishida, Tomoya [1 ]
Kojima, Takashi [1 ,2 ]
Kataoka, Takahiro [1 ]
Isogai, Naoki [1 ]
Yoshida, Yoko [1 ]
Nakamura, Tomoaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Eye Clin, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure; Corvis ST® Forme fruste keratoconus; Keratoconus; Scheimpflug camera; TRANSEPITHELIAL PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; CORNEAL RESPONSE PARAMETERS; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; CROSS-LINKING; THICKNESS; ANALYZER; HEALTHY;
D O I
10.1159/000506839
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Introduction: Although biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) is available, the effectiveness of intraocular pressure (IOP) correction in keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus (FFK) eyes has not been investigated. Objective: Evaluation of bIOP measurements in eyes with keratoconus and FFK. Methods: Forty-two eyes in 21 patients with keratoconus in one eye and FFK in the fellow eye were examined (KC/FFK group; mean age 24.62 +/- 8.6 years; 16 males and 5 females). The control group consisted of 62 eyes in 31 unaffected subjects (mean age 26.26 +/- 3.64 years; 15 males and 16 females). The bIOP was determined using a Scheimpflug-based tonometer (Corvis Scheimpflug Technology [Corvis ST (R)]) after measuring the IOP with a conventional non-contact tonometer (NIOP). The agreement between NIOP and bIOP values was examined using the Bland-Altman plot. The difference between NIOP and bIOP (bIOP correction amount) was compared between keratoconus and FFK eyes. Results: In the control group, there were no significant differences between right and left eyes in both NIOP and bIOP values (p = 0.975 and p = 0.224, respectively). In the KC/FFK group, NIOP values were significantly lower in the keratoconus eyes (9.93 +/- 1.96 mm Hg) than in the FFK eyes (12.23 +/- 3.03 mm Hg; p = 0.0003). There was no significant difference in bIOP values between the right and left eyes of the KC/FFK group (p = 0.168). The bIOP correction amount was significantly increased in keratoconus eyes (3.58 +/- 2.12 mm Hg) compared to in FFK eyes (1.80 +/- 3.32 mm Hg; p = 0.011). Conclusions: For eyes with keratoconus and FFK, the bIOP method is effective to adjust IOP measurements based on corneal biomechanical properties.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 549
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Systematic Review of Subclinical Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus
    Henriquez, Maria A.
    Hadid, Marta
    Izquierdo, Luis, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 36 (04) : 270 - +
  • [2] Biomechanical properties analysis of forme fruste keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus
    Yan Huo
    Xuan Chen
    Huazheng Cao
    Jing Li
    Jie Hou
    Yan Wang
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2023, 261 : 1311 - 1320
  • [3] Biomechanical properties analysis of forme fruste keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus
    Huo, Yan
    Chen, Xuan
    Cao, Huazheng
    Li, Jing
    Hou, Jie
    Wang, Yan
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 261 (05) : 1311 - 1320
  • [4] Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation for Forme Fruste and Stable Keratoconus
    Montano, Margarita
    Lopez-Dorantes, Karla P.
    Ramirez-Miranda, Arturo
    Graue-Hernandez, Enrique O.
    Navas, Alejandro
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 30 (04) : 282 - 285
  • [5] Comparison of the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal corneas
    Guo, Li-Li
    Tian, Lei
    Cao, Kai
    Li, Yu-Xin
    Li, Na
    Yang, Wei-Qiang
    Jie, Ying
    SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 36 (08) : 671 - 678
  • [6] SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF NOVEL BIOMECHANICAL WAVEFORM PARAMETERS IN DETECTING FORME FRUSTE KERATOCONUS AND KERATOCONUS
    Viswanathan, Deepa
    Males, John
    Kumar, Nikhil
    Graham, Stuart
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 42 : 87 - 87
  • [7] Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes
    Mohammad Naderan
    Ali Jahanrad
    Mahgol Farjadnia
    International Ophthalmology, 2018, 38 : 1565 - 1573
  • [8] Screening of Forme Fruste Keratoconus with the Ocular Response Analyzer
    Schweitzer, Cedric
    Roberts, Cynthia J.
    Mahmoud, Ashraf M.
    Colin, Joseph
    Maurice-Tison, Sylvie
    Kerautret, Julien
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (05) : 2403 - 2410
  • [9] Corneal and Total Aberrations in Patients With Fruste Forme Keratoconus
    Schlegel, Z.
    Gatinel, D.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [10] Topographic and Tomographic Properties of Forme Fruste Keratoconus Corneas
    Saad, Alain
    Gatinel, Damien
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (11) : 5546 - 5555