A simple method for exploring adverse drug events in patients with different primary diseases using spontaneous reporting system

被引:12
|
作者
Noguchi, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Ueno, Anri [1 ]
Otsubo, Manami [1 ]
Katsuno, Hayato [1 ]
Sugita, Ikuto [1 ]
Kanematsu, Yuta [1 ]
Yoshida, Aki [1 ]
Esaki, Hiroki [1 ]
Tachi, Tomoya [1 ]
Teramachi, Hitomi [1 ]
机构
[1] Gifu Pharmaceut Univ, Lab Clin Pharm, 1-25-4 Daigakunishi, Gifu 5011196, Japan
来源
BMC BIOINFORMATICS | 2018年 / 19卷
关键词
SIGNAL-DETECTION; DISPROPORTIONALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12859-018-2137-y
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Patient background (e.g. age, sex, and primary disease) is an important factor to consider when monitoring adverse drug events (ADEs) for the purpose of pharmacovigilance. However, in disproportionality methods, when additional factors are considered, the number of combinations that have to be computed increases, and it becomes very difficult to explore the whole spontaneous reporting system (SRS). Since the signals need to be detected quickly in pharmacovigilance, a simple exploration method is required. Although association rule mining (AR) is commonly used for the analysis of large data, its application to pharmacovigilance is rare and there are almost no studies comparing AR with conventional signal detection methods. Methods: In this study, in order to establish a simple method to explore ADEs in patients with kidney or liver injury as a background disease, the AR and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) signal detection methods were compared. We used oral medicine SRS data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER), and used AR as the proposed search method and PRR as the conventional method for comparison. "Rule count >= 3", "min lift value > 1", and "min conviction value > 1" were used as the AR detection criteria, and the PRR detection criteria were "Rule count >= 3", "PRR >= 2", and "X-2 >= 4". Results: In patients with kidney injury, the AR method had a sensitivity of 99.58%, specificity of 94.99%, and Youden's index of 0.946, while in patients with liver injury, the sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index were 99.57%, 94.87%, and 0.944, respectively. Additionally, the lift value and the strength of the signal were positively correlated. Conclusions: It was suggested that computation using AR might be simple with the detection power equivalent to that of the conventional signal detection method as PRR. In addition, AR can theoretically be applicable to SRS other than JADER. Therefore, complicated conditions (patient's background etc.) that must take factors other than the ADE into consideration can be easily explored by selecting the AR as the first screening for ADE exploration in pharmacovigilance using SRS.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predictors of serious adverse drug events from opioids: Results from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System
    McDonald, Deborah Dillon
    Srisopa, Pornpan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2021, 33 (12) : 1207 - 1215
  • [42] A retrospective analysis of adverse drug events leading to hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization in Saudi Arabia using the Saudi food and drug authority (SFDA) spontaneous reporting system
    AlQadheeb, Eman Khalid
    Alblowi, Fotoun
    Alolayet, Rayan Ibrahim
    Al-Sadaawi, Asma
    Alharbi, Muhanad
    AlShahrani, Mobarak
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 31 : 459 - 459
  • [43] Reported Adverse Events with Painkillers: Data Mining of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System
    Jae Min
    Vicki Osborne
    Allison Kowalski
    Mattia Prosperi
    Drug Safety, 2018, 41 : 313 - 320
  • [44] Reported Adverse Events with Painkillers: Data Mining of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System
    Min, Jae
    Osborne, Vicki
    Kowalski, Allison
    Prosperi, Mattia
    DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 41 (03) : 313 - 320
  • [45] Time-to-Onset Analysis of Drug-Induced Long QT Syndrome Based on a Spontaneous Reporting System for Adverse Drug Events
    Sasaoka, Sayaka
    Matsui, Toshinobu
    Hane, Yuuki
    Abe, Junko
    Ueda, Natsumi
    Motooka, Yumi
    Hatahira, Haruna
    Fukuda, Akiho
    Naganuma, Misa
    Hasegawa, Shiori
    Kinosada, Yasutomi
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (10):
  • [46] SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS IN NORPLANT USERS REPORTED TO THE FOOD-AND-DRUG-ADMINISTRATIONS MEDWATCH SPONTANEOUS REPORTING SYSTEM - REPLY
    WYSOWSKI, DK
    GREEN, L
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 86 (02): : 319 - 320
  • [47] A Review of Dental Adverse Events Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
    Altman, Keith
    Budny, Renata
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2014, 23 : 400 - 400
  • [48] Investigation of the Link Between Intestinal Adverse Events and Olmesartan Using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System
    Samo, Salih
    Stobaugh, Derrick J.
    Ehrenpreis, Eli D.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (05) : S604 - S604
  • [49] Comprehensive Analysis of Mitotane-Related Adverse Events Using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System
    Wang, Xing
    Li, Jun
    Zhang, Yunfeng
    Huang, Ruizhen
    Zhang, Penglin
    Hu, Honglin
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2025, 31 (03) : 278 - 285
  • [50] Central nervous system adverse events of ceftazidime/avibactam: A retrospective study using Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System
    Guo, Xiaolong
    Guo, Mingxing
    Li, Jiyang
    Cui, Xiangli
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 47 (12) : 2369 - 2372