A simple method for exploring adverse drug events in patients with different primary diseases using spontaneous reporting system

被引:12
|
作者
Noguchi, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Ueno, Anri [1 ]
Otsubo, Manami [1 ]
Katsuno, Hayato [1 ]
Sugita, Ikuto [1 ]
Kanematsu, Yuta [1 ]
Yoshida, Aki [1 ]
Esaki, Hiroki [1 ]
Tachi, Tomoya [1 ]
Teramachi, Hitomi [1 ]
机构
[1] Gifu Pharmaceut Univ, Lab Clin Pharm, 1-25-4 Daigakunishi, Gifu 5011196, Japan
来源
BMC BIOINFORMATICS | 2018年 / 19卷
关键词
SIGNAL-DETECTION; DISPROPORTIONALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12859-018-2137-y
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Patient background (e.g. age, sex, and primary disease) is an important factor to consider when monitoring adverse drug events (ADEs) for the purpose of pharmacovigilance. However, in disproportionality methods, when additional factors are considered, the number of combinations that have to be computed increases, and it becomes very difficult to explore the whole spontaneous reporting system (SRS). Since the signals need to be detected quickly in pharmacovigilance, a simple exploration method is required. Although association rule mining (AR) is commonly used for the analysis of large data, its application to pharmacovigilance is rare and there are almost no studies comparing AR with conventional signal detection methods. Methods: In this study, in order to establish a simple method to explore ADEs in patients with kidney or liver injury as a background disease, the AR and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) signal detection methods were compared. We used oral medicine SRS data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER), and used AR as the proposed search method and PRR as the conventional method for comparison. "Rule count >= 3", "min lift value > 1", and "min conviction value > 1" were used as the AR detection criteria, and the PRR detection criteria were "Rule count >= 3", "PRR >= 2", and "X-2 >= 4". Results: In patients with kidney injury, the AR method had a sensitivity of 99.58%, specificity of 94.99%, and Youden's index of 0.946, while in patients with liver injury, the sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index were 99.57%, 94.87%, and 0.944, respectively. Additionally, the lift value and the strength of the signal were positively correlated. Conclusions: It was suggested that computation using AR might be simple with the detection power equivalent to that of the conventional signal detection method as PRR. In addition, AR can theoretically be applicable to SRS other than JADER. Therefore, complicated conditions (patient's background etc.) that must take factors other than the ADE into consideration can be easily explored by selecting the AR as the first screening for ADE exploration in pharmacovigilance using SRS.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Olfactory-Related Adverse Events: An Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System
    Minutello, Katrina M.
    Lofgren, Daniel H.
    Lenkeit, Christopher P.
    Emmer, Eriel
    Rivera, Olga Santiago
    Hasan, Md Sakibur
    Downs, Asha
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2024, 170 (05) : 1296 - 1306
  • [32] Analysis of the time-to-onset of osteonecrosis of jaw with bisphosphonate treatment using the data from a spontaneous reporting system of adverse drug events
    Mitsuhiro Nakamura
    Ryogo Umetsu
    Junko Abe
    Toshinobu Matsui
    Natsumi Ueda
    Yamato Kato
    Sayaka Sasaoka
    Kohei Tahara
    Hirofumi Takeuchi
    Yasutomi Kinosada
    Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, 1 (1)
  • [33] Analysis of the time-to-onset of osteonecrosis of jaw with bisphosphonate treatment using the data from a spontaneous reporting system of adverse drug events
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Umetsu, Ryogo
    Abe, Junko
    Matsui, Toshinobu
    Ueda, Natsumi
    Kato, Yamato
    Sasaoka, Sayaka
    Tahara, Kohei
    Takeuchi, Hirofumi
    Kinosada, Yasutomi
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH CARE AND SCIENCES, 2015, 1
  • [34] Analysis of Duloxetine-Related Adverse Events Using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System
    Zhu, Meng
    Lv, Shengxia
    Zhu, Feiye
    Zhang, Yongsheng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 45 (02) : 96 - 105
  • [35] Determinants of signal selection in a spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactions
    van Puijenbroek, EP
    van Grootheest, K
    Diemont, WL
    Leufkens, HGM
    Egberts, ACG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 52 (05) : 579 - 586
  • [36] Reply: "Exploring Safety in Gender-Affirming Hormonal Treatments: An Observational Study on Adverse Drug Events Using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database"
    Villa-Zapata, Lorenzo
    Gomez-Lumbreras, Ainhoa
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2024,
  • [37] Detection of Vaccine Adverse Events Before Package Insert Revisions Using a Japanese Spontaneous Reporting System
    Suzuki, Shimon
    Imai, Shungo
    Mitsuboshi, Satoru
    Kizaki, Hayato
    Hashiguchi, Masayuki
    Hori, Satoko
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 63 (08): : 903 - 908
  • [38] Quality check of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting forms of different countries
    Bandekar, M. S.
    Anwikar, S. R.
    Kshirsagar, N. A.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 19 (11) : 1181 - 1185
  • [39] Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in elderly patients in Sicily (Italy)
    Cutroneo, P
    Greco, S
    Cucinotta, G
    Arcoraci, V
    Caputi, AP
    PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 40 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [40] Identification of drug misuse - Study of spontaneous notifications of adverse drug events in a regional safety reporting centre
    Livry, C
    Disson-Dautriche, A
    Jolimoy, G
    Tabutiaux, A
    Sgro, C
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 2003, 32 (33): : 1552 - 1556