A simple method for exploring adverse drug events in patients with different primary diseases using spontaneous reporting system

被引:12
|
作者
Noguchi, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Ueno, Anri [1 ]
Otsubo, Manami [1 ]
Katsuno, Hayato [1 ]
Sugita, Ikuto [1 ]
Kanematsu, Yuta [1 ]
Yoshida, Aki [1 ]
Esaki, Hiroki [1 ]
Tachi, Tomoya [1 ]
Teramachi, Hitomi [1 ]
机构
[1] Gifu Pharmaceut Univ, Lab Clin Pharm, 1-25-4 Daigakunishi, Gifu 5011196, Japan
来源
BMC BIOINFORMATICS | 2018年 / 19卷
关键词
SIGNAL-DETECTION; DISPROPORTIONALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12859-018-2137-y
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Patient background (e.g. age, sex, and primary disease) is an important factor to consider when monitoring adverse drug events (ADEs) for the purpose of pharmacovigilance. However, in disproportionality methods, when additional factors are considered, the number of combinations that have to be computed increases, and it becomes very difficult to explore the whole spontaneous reporting system (SRS). Since the signals need to be detected quickly in pharmacovigilance, a simple exploration method is required. Although association rule mining (AR) is commonly used for the analysis of large data, its application to pharmacovigilance is rare and there are almost no studies comparing AR with conventional signal detection methods. Methods: In this study, in order to establish a simple method to explore ADEs in patients with kidney or liver injury as a background disease, the AR and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) signal detection methods were compared. We used oral medicine SRS data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER), and used AR as the proposed search method and PRR as the conventional method for comparison. "Rule count >= 3", "min lift value > 1", and "min conviction value > 1" were used as the AR detection criteria, and the PRR detection criteria were "Rule count >= 3", "PRR >= 2", and "X-2 >= 4". Results: In patients with kidney injury, the AR method had a sensitivity of 99.58%, specificity of 94.99%, and Youden's index of 0.946, while in patients with liver injury, the sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index were 99.57%, 94.87%, and 0.944, respectively. Additionally, the lift value and the strength of the signal were positively correlated. Conclusions: It was suggested that computation using AR might be simple with the detection power equivalent to that of the conventional signal detection method as PRR. In addition, AR can theoretically be applicable to SRS other than JADER. Therefore, complicated conditions (patient's background etc.) that must take factors other than the ADE into consideration can be easily explored by selecting the AR as the first screening for ADE exploration in pharmacovigilance using SRS.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using Facebook to Increase Spontaneous Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions
    Knezevic, Marinela Z.
    Bivolarevic, Ivana C.
    Peric, Tanja S.
    Jankovic, Slobodan M.
    DRUG SAFETY, 2011, 34 (04) : 351 - 352
  • [22] Evaluation of adverse events associated with filgrastim originator and biosimilar using a spontaneous reporting system database
    Niinomi, I
    Hosohata, K.
    Oyama, S.
    Inada, A.
    Wakabayashi, T.
    Iwanaga, K.
    PHARMAZIE, 2020, 75 (04): : 151 - 153
  • [23] Exploring Safety in Gender-Affirming Hormonal Treatments: An Observational Study on Adverse Drug Events Using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database
    Gomez-Lumbreras, Ainhoa
    Villa-Zapata, Lorenzo
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2024, 58 (11) : 1089 - 1098
  • [24] Exploring Safety in Gender-Affirming Hormonal Treatments: An Observational Study on Adverse Drug Events Using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database
    Laidlaw, Michael K.
    Jorgensen, Sarah
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2024,
  • [25] Evaluation of cardiac adverse events with ponatinib using a spontaneous reporting database
    Kanbayashi, Yuko
    Uchida, Mayako
    Nakano, Kana
    Wakabayashi, Haruka
    Shimizu, Tadashi
    ONCOLOGY, 2023, 101 (06) : 397 - 405
  • [26] Monitoring adverse drug events: The Food and Drug Administration MedWatch reporting system
    Landow, L
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1998, 23 (06): : 190 - 193
  • [27] A Disproportionality Analysis of the Adverse Drug Events Associated with Lurasidone in Paediatric Patients Using the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
    Kate E. Rees
    Te-yuan Chyou
    Prasad S. Nishtala
    Drug Safety, 2020, 43 : 607 - 609
  • [28] A Disproportionality Analysis of the Adverse Drug Events Associated with Lurasidone in Paediatric Patients Using the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
    Rees, Kate E.
    Chyou, Te-yuan
    Nishtala, Prasad S.
    DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 43 (06) : 607 - 609
  • [29] SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS IN NORPLANT USERS REPORTED TO THE FOOD-AND-DRUG-ADMINISTRATION MEDWATCH SPONTANEOUS REPORTING SYSTEM
    SIVIN, I
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 86 (02): : 318 - 319
  • [30] SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS IN NORPLANT USERS RELATED TO THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATIONS MEDWATCH SPONTANEOUS REPORTING SYSTEM - REPLY
    WYSOWSKI, DK
    GREEN, L
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 86 (01): : 154 - 155