Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review

被引:39
|
作者
Hut-Mossel, Lisanne [1 ]
Ahaus, Kees [2 ]
Welker, Gera [3 ]
Gans, Rijk [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Expertise Qual & Safety, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Dept Hlth Serv Management & Org, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Internal Med, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
HEALTH-CARE; CLINICAL AUDIT; OPERATING-ROOM; FEEDBACK INTERVENTIONS; IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; MULTICENTER AUDIT; OF-CARE; ACCREDITATION; IMPLEMENTATION; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0248677
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Several types of audits have been used to promote quality improvement (QI) in hospital care. However, in-depth studies into the mechanisms responsible for the effectiveness of audits in a given context is scarce. We sought to understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that determine why audits might, or might not, lead to improved quality of hospital care. Methods A realist review was conducted to systematically search and synthesise the literature on audits. Data from individual papers were synthesised by coding, iteratively testing and supplementing initial programme theories, and refining these theories into a set of context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOcs). Results From our synthesis of 85 papers, seven CMOcs were identified that explain how audits work: (1) externally initiated audits create QI awareness although their impact on improvement diminishes over time; (2) a sense of urgency felt by healthcare professionals triggers engagement with an audit; (3) champions are vital for an audit to be perceived by healthcare professionals as worth the effort; (4) bottom-up initiated audits are more likely to bring about sustained change; (5) knowledge-sharing within externally mandated audits triggers participation by healthcare professionals; (6) audit data support healthcare professionals in raising issues in their dialogues with those in leadership positions; and (7) audits legitimise the provision of feedback to colleagues, which flattens the perceived hierarchy and encourages constructive collaboration. Conclusions This realist review has identified seven CMOcs that should be taken into account when seeking to optimise the design and usage of audits. These CMOcs can provide policy makers and practice leaders with an adequate conceptual grounding to design contextually sensitive audits in diverse settings and advance the audit research agenda for various contexts. PROSPERO registration CRD42016039882.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improving Patient Handovers From Hospital to Primary Care A Systematic Review
    Hesselink, Gijs
    Schoonhoven, Lisette
    Barach, Paul
    Spijker, Anouk
    Gademan, Petra
    Kalkman, Cor
    Liefers, Janine
    Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra
    Wollersheim, Hub
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 157 (06) : 417 - U81
  • [22] Hospital Care for Newborn Babies: Quality Assessment, A Systematic Review
    Jabbari, Hossein
    Sabet, Somayae Abdollahi
    Heidarzadeh, Mohammad
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2015, 25 (05)
  • [23] Why is Kangaroo Mother Care not yet scaled in the UK? A systematic review and realist synthesis of a frugal innovation for newborn care
    Stefani, Giulietta
    Skopec, Mark
    Battersby, Cheryl
    Harris, Matthew
    BMJ INNOVATIONS, 2022, 8 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [24] A review of prospective transfusion audits in a tertiary-care hospital
    Nasseemuddin, A. S.
    Colanta, A. B.
    Friedman, M. T.
    TRANSFUSION, 2007, 47 (03) : 187A - 188A
  • [25] The Impact of Hospital Competition on the Quality of Care in Europe: A Systematic Review
    Timofeyev, Yuriy
    Goldenova, Viktoriya
    Mantaeva, Elza
    Jakovljevic, Mihajlo
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (22)
  • [26] Hospital design: Understanding implications for work practices, care quality and patient safety
    Penfold, Clarissa
    Maben, Jill
    Anderson, Janet
    Robert, Glenn
    Peter, Griffiths
    HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS ERGONOMICS AND PATIENT SAFETY 2011: AN ALLIANCE BETWEEN PROFESSIONALS AND CITIZENS FOR PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE, 2011, : 296 - +
  • [27] How do breastfeeding workplace interventions work?: a realist review
    Kathrin Litwan
    Victoria Tran
    Kate Nyhan
    Rafael Pérez-Escamilla
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 20
  • [28] How do breastfeeding workplace interventions work?: a realist review
    Litwan, Kathrin
    Tran, Victoria
    Nyhan, Kate
    Perez-Escamilla, Rafael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [29] Exploring how and why Care Groups work to improve infant feeding practices in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review protocol
    Pieterse, Pieternella
    Matthews, Anne
    Walsh, Aisling
    Chirwa, Ellen
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [30] Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol
    van Hees, Suzanne G. M.
    Carlier, Bouwine E.
    Blonk, Roland W. B.
    Oomens, Shirley
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2021, 69 (03): : 827 - 838