Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol

被引:8
|
作者
van Hees, Suzanne G. M. [1 ,2 ]
Carlier, Bouwine E. [1 ]
Blonk, Roland W. B. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Oomens, Shirley [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] HAN Univ Appl Sci, Occupat & Hlth Res Grp, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg Sch Social & Behav Sci, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] North West Univ, Optentia Res Focus Area, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
[4] TNO, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Radboudumc, Dept Primary & Community Care, Sch Occupat Hlth, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Realist research; methodology; occupational health; mental disorders; HEALTH; INTERVENTIONS; DISABILITY; PEOPLE; RETURN;
D O I
10.3233/WOR-213515
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Work participation among employees with commonmental disorders (CMDs) is an increasingly important, yet highly complex phenomenon. Given the call for preventing instead of reacting to negative work outcomes, there is a need to understand how employees with CMDs can continue working. OBJECTIVES: 1) to provide insights in applying a realist approach to the literature review process and 2) to present a way to develop an explanatory framework on work participation, the related causal mechanisms and the interaction with the work context. METHODS: A systematic realist literature review, using stay at work (SAW) and work performance (WP) as outcomes of work participation. This protocol paper explains the rationale, tools and procedures developed and used for identification, selection, appraisal and synthesis of included studies. RESULTS: The review process entailed six steps to develop so called 'middle range program theories'. Each step followed a systematic, iterative procedure using context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting a realist review adds on the understanding to promote work participation, by examining the heterogeneity and complexity of intervention- and observational studies. This paper facilitates other researchers within the field of occupational health by demonstrating ways to develop a framework on work participation using realist synthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 838
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review
    Husk K.
    Blockley K.
    Lovell R.
    Bethel A.
    Bloomfield D.
    Warber S.
    Pearson M.
    Lang I.
    Byng R.
    Garside R.
    Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [2] Countering Violent Extremism: A Realist Review for Assessing What Works, for Whom, in What Circumstances, and How?
    Gielen, Amy-Jane
    TERRORISM AND POLITICAL VIOLENCE, 2019, 31 (06) : 1149 - 1167
  • [3] Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for common mental health disorders, what works, for whom under what circumstances? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Grist R.
    Cavanagh K.
    Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 2013, 43 (4) : 243 - 251
  • [4] A realist review of shared medical appointments: How, for whom, and under what circumstances do they work?
    Kirsh, Susan R.
    Aron, David C.
    Johnson, Kimberly D.
    Santurri, Laura E.
    Stevenson, Lauren D.
    Jones, Katherine R.
    Jagosh, Justin
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [5] A realist review of shared medical appointments: How, for whom, and under what circumstances do they work?
    Susan R. Kirsh
    David C. Aron
    Kimberly D. Johnson
    Laura E. Santurri
    Lauren D. Stevenson
    Katherine R. Jones
    Justin Jagosh
    BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [6] Care Planning: What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances? A Rapid Realist Review
    Brown, Sarah
    Lhussier, Monique
    Dalkin, Sonia M.
    Eaton, Simon
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2018, 28 (14) : 2250 - 2266
  • [7] Complex interventions: What works, for whom, and in what circumstances? A rapid realist review
    Naughton, Stephen
    Rapaport, Penny
    Ali, Afia
    Elahi, Farah
    Lahab, Maria
    Hassiotis, Angela
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 34 (05) : 1330 - 1330
  • [8] Towards a better understanding of work participation among employees with common mental health problems: a systematic realist review
    van Hees, Suzanne G. M.
    Carlier, Bouwine E.
    Vossen, Emma
    Blonk, Roland W. B.
    Oomens, Shirley
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2022, 48 (03) : 173 - 189
  • [9] What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review
    Husk, Kerryn
    Blockley, Kelly
    Lovell, Rebecca
    Bethel, Alison
    Lang, Iain
    Byng, Richard
    Garside, Ruth
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2020, 28 (02) : 309 - 324
  • [10] A realist evaluation of a physical activity participation intervention for children and youth with disabilities: what works, for whom, in what circumstances, and how?
    C. E. Willis
    S. Reid
    C. Elliott
    M. Rosenberg
    A. Nyquist
    R. Jahnsen
    S. Girdler
    BMC Pediatrics, 18