Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review

被引:39
|
作者
Hut-Mossel, Lisanne [1 ]
Ahaus, Kees [2 ]
Welker, Gera [3 ]
Gans, Rijk [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Ctr Expertise Qual & Safety, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Dept Hlth Serv Management & Org, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Internal Med, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
HEALTH-CARE; CLINICAL AUDIT; OPERATING-ROOM; FEEDBACK INTERVENTIONS; IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; MULTICENTER AUDIT; OF-CARE; ACCREDITATION; IMPLEMENTATION; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0248677
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Several types of audits have been used to promote quality improvement (QI) in hospital care. However, in-depth studies into the mechanisms responsible for the effectiveness of audits in a given context is scarce. We sought to understand the mechanisms and contextual factors that determine why audits might, or might not, lead to improved quality of hospital care. Methods A realist review was conducted to systematically search and synthesise the literature on audits. Data from individual papers were synthesised by coding, iteratively testing and supplementing initial programme theories, and refining these theories into a set of context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOcs). Results From our synthesis of 85 papers, seven CMOcs were identified that explain how audits work: (1) externally initiated audits create QI awareness although their impact on improvement diminishes over time; (2) a sense of urgency felt by healthcare professionals triggers engagement with an audit; (3) champions are vital for an audit to be perceived by healthcare professionals as worth the effort; (4) bottom-up initiated audits are more likely to bring about sustained change; (5) knowledge-sharing within externally mandated audits triggers participation by healthcare professionals; (6) audit data support healthcare professionals in raising issues in their dialogues with those in leadership positions; and (7) audits legitimise the provision of feedback to colleagues, which flattens the perceived hierarchy and encourages constructive collaboration. Conclusions This realist review has identified seven CMOcs that should be taken into account when seeking to optimise the design and usage of audits. These CMOcs can provide policy makers and practice leaders with an adequate conceptual grounding to design contextually sensitive audits in diverse settings and advance the audit research agenda for various contexts. PROSPERO registration CRD42016039882.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploring how and why Care Groups work to improve infant feeding practices in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review protocol
    Pieternella Pieterse
    Anne Matthews
    Aisling Walsh
    Ellen Chirwa
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [32] Towards a better understanding of work participation among employees with common mental health problems: a systematic realist review
    van Hees, Suzanne G. M.
    Carlier, Bouwine E.
    Vossen, Emma
    Blonk, Roland W. B.
    Oomens, Shirley
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2022, 48 (03) : 173 - 189
  • [33] How might patient involvement in healthcare quality improvement efforts work-A realist literature review
    Bergerum, Carolina
    Thor, Johan
    Josefsson, Karin
    Wolmesjo, Maria
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2019, 22 (05) : 952 - 964
  • [34] Improving the quality of hospital care in America
    Romano, PS
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (03): : 302 - 304
  • [35] General practitioners' role in improving health care in care homes: a realist review
    Chadborn, Neil H.
    Devi, Reena
    Goodman, Claire
    Williams, Christopher D.
    Sartain, Kate
    Gordon, Adam L.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2022, : 119 - 127
  • [36] HEALTHCARE INTERVENTIONS FOR IMPROVING QUALITY USE OF ANTIBIOTICS IN THE HOSPITAL SETTING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Chanjaruporn, F.
    Rochanadumrongkul, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A658 - A658
  • [37] Improving quality of surgical and anaesthesia care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of hospital-based quality improvement interventions
    Brima, Nataliya
    Morhason-Bello, Imran O.
    Charles, Vandy
    Davies, Justine
    Leather, Andy J. M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [38] Anthropological Insights about a Tool for Improving Quality of Obstetric Care: The Experience of Case Review Audits in Burkina Faso
    Gruenais, Marc-Eric
    Ouattara, Fatoumata
    Richard, Fabienne
    De Brouwere, Vincent
    ANTHROPOLOGY IN ACTION-JOURNAL FOR APPLIED ANTHROPOLOGY IN POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 19 (02) : 27 - 36
  • [39] Between-hospital variation in indicators of quality of care: a systematic review
    van der Linde, Margrietha
    Salet, Newel
    van Leeuwen, Nikki
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    Eijkenaar, Frank
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2024, 33 (07) : 443 - 455
  • [40] A Systematic Review of the Association Between Hospital Cost/price and the Quality of Care
    Sara Jamalabadi
    Vera Winter
    Jonas Schreyögg
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2020, 18 : 625 - 639