Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy Bilateral Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for One-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

被引:14
|
作者
Hua, Wenbin [1 ]
Wang, Bingjin [1 ]
Ke, Wencan [1 ]
Xiang, Qian [1 ]
Wu, Xinghuo [1 ]
Zhang, Yukun [1 ]
Li, Shuai [1 ]
Yang, Shuhua [1 ]
Wu, Qiang [1 ]
Yang, Cao [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Union Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2021年 / 7卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression; minimally invasive; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; lumbar spinal stenosis; degenerative spondylolisthesis;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2020.596327
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Both lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression (LE-ULBD) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) have been used to treat one-level lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with degenerative spondylolisthesis, while the differences of the clinical outcomes are still uncertain. Methods: Among 60 consecutive patients included, 24 surgeries were performed by LE-ULBD and 36 surgeries were performed by MI-TUF. Patient demographics, operation characteristics and complications were recorded. Sagittal parameters, including slip percentage (SP) and slip angle (SA) were compared. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and Macnab criteria were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results: The estimated blood loss, time to ambulation and length of hospitalization of the LE-ULBD group were shorter than the MI-TUF group. Preoperative and final follow-up SP of the LE-ULBD group was of no significant difference, while final follow-up SP of the MI-TLIF group was significantly improved compared with preoperative SR The postoperative mean VAS and ODI scores decreased significantly in both LE-ULBD group and MI-TUF group. According to the modified Macnab criteria, the outcomes rated as excellent/good rate were 95.8 and 97.2%, respectively, in both LE-ULBD group and MI-TUF group. Intraoperative complication rate of the LE-ULBD and the MI-TLIF group were 4.2 and 0%, respectively. One case of intraoperative epineurium injury was observed in the LE-ULBD group. Postoperative complication rate of the LE-ULBD and the MI-TLIF group were 0 and 5.6%, respectively. One case with transient urinary retention and one case with pleural effusion were observed in the MI-TLIF group. Conclusion: Both LE-ULBD and MI-TLIF are safe and effective to treat one-level LSS with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases
    Tian Y.
    Liu X.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2016, 26 (7) : 745 - 751
  • [42] Comparison of clinical outcomes and spino-pelvic sagittal balance in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis Minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
    Li, Renjie
    Shao, Xiaofeng
    Li, Xuefeng
    Liu, Yijie
    Jiang, Weimin
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (03) : E23783
  • [43] Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in the elderly
    Cheng, Xiao-Kang
    Cheng, Yuan-pei
    Liu, Zhao-Yu
    Bian, Fu-Cheng
    Yang, Feng-Kai
    Yang, Ning
    Zhang, Lin-Xia
    Chen, Bin
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 194
  • [44] Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Han, Xiao-guang
    Tang, Guo-qing
    Han, Xiao
    Xing, Yong-gang
    Zhang, Qi
    He, Da
    Tian, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (07) : 2093 - 2101
  • [45] Comparison of Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Meta-analysis
    Xiao, Shanwen
    Zhou, Shufang
    Pan, Shixin
    Ning, Jinpei
    Gan, Xiutian
    Guan, Yanhua
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (02): : 56 - 66
  • [46] Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
    Shen, Xiaolong
    Wang, Lei
    Zhang, Hailong
    Gu, Xin
    Gu, Guangfei
    He, Shisheng
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (01): : E1 - E8
  • [47] Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases
    Xue, Huaming
    Tu, Yihui
    Cai, Minwei
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (03): : 209 - 215
  • [48] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Fan Shunwu
    Zhao Xing
    Zhao Fengdong
    Fang Xiangqian
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (17) : 1615 - 1620
  • [49] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE DISEASE
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Sharma, Arvind
    Singh, Jitendra
    Deen, Shameer
    Tanwar, Akansha
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (105): : 17055 - 17057
  • [50] In Patients with One-Level Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, a Posterior Approach with Transforaminal Lateral Interbody Fusion Improved Radiographic But Not Clinical Outcomes
    Orr, R. Douglas
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 100 (04): : 345 - 345