Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy Bilateral Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for One-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

被引:14
|
作者
Hua, Wenbin [1 ]
Wang, Bingjin [1 ]
Ke, Wencan [1 ]
Xiang, Qian [1 ]
Wu, Xinghuo [1 ]
Zhang, Yukun [1 ]
Li, Shuai [1 ]
Yang, Shuhua [1 ]
Wu, Qiang [1 ]
Yang, Cao [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Union Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2021年 / 7卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression; minimally invasive; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; lumbar spinal stenosis; degenerative spondylolisthesis;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2020.596327
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Both lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression (LE-ULBD) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) have been used to treat one-level lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with degenerative spondylolisthesis, while the differences of the clinical outcomes are still uncertain. Methods: Among 60 consecutive patients included, 24 surgeries were performed by LE-ULBD and 36 surgeries were performed by MI-TUF. Patient demographics, operation characteristics and complications were recorded. Sagittal parameters, including slip percentage (SP) and slip angle (SA) were compared. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and Macnab criteria were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results: The estimated blood loss, time to ambulation and length of hospitalization of the LE-ULBD group were shorter than the MI-TUF group. Preoperative and final follow-up SP of the LE-ULBD group was of no significant difference, while final follow-up SP of the MI-TLIF group was significantly improved compared with preoperative SR The postoperative mean VAS and ODI scores decreased significantly in both LE-ULBD group and MI-TUF group. According to the modified Macnab criteria, the outcomes rated as excellent/good rate were 95.8 and 97.2%, respectively, in both LE-ULBD group and MI-TUF group. Intraoperative complication rate of the LE-ULBD and the MI-TLIF group were 4.2 and 0%, respectively. One case of intraoperative epineurium injury was observed in the LE-ULBD group. Postoperative complication rate of the LE-ULBD and the MI-TLIF group were 0 and 5.6%, respectively. One case with transient urinary retention and one case with pleural effusion were observed in the MI-TLIF group. Conclusion: Both LE-ULBD and MI-TLIF are safe and effective to treat one-level LSS with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Posterior Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Kobayashi, Yuto
    Tamai, Koji
    Toyoda, Hiromitsu
    Terai, Hidetomi
    Hoshino, Masatoshi
    Suzuki, Akinobu
    Takahashi, Shinji
    Hori, Yusuke
    Yabu, Akito
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (18) : 1218 - 1225
  • [22] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Unilateral Fixation for Degenerative Lumbar Disease
    Wang, Hui-wang
    Hu, Yong-cheng
    Wu, Zhan-yong
    Wu, Hua-rong
    Wu, Chun-fu
    Zhang, Lian-suo
    Xu, Wei-kun
    Fan, Hui-long
    Cai, Jin-sheng
    Ma, Jian-qing
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2017, 9 (03) : 277 - 283
  • [23] Comparison of Outcomes Between Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Retrospective Study
    Xu, Hongyao
    Yu, Lei
    Xiao, Bing
    Zhao, Hong
    Gu, Xin
    Gao, Zengxin
    Wang, Weiheng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 183 : E98 - E108
  • [24] Percutaneous Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Vs. Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    He, Li-Ming
    Li, Jia-Rui
    Wu, Hao-Ran
    Chang, Qiang
    Guan, Xiao-Ming
    Ma, Zhuo
    Feng, Hao-Yu
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [25] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study
    Hao Chen
    Goudi Zheng
    Zhenyu Bian
    Changju Hou
    Maoqiang Li
    Zhen Zhang
    Liulong Zhu
    Xuepeng Wang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [26] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study
    Chen, Hao
    Zheng, Goudi
    Bian, Zhenyu
    Hou, Changju
    Li, Maoqiang
    Zhang, Zhen
    Zhu, Liulong
    Wang, Xuepeng
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [27] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Kim, Jong Yeol
    Park, Jeong Yoon
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Kuh, Sung Uk
    Chin, Dong Kyu
    Kim, Keun Su
    Cho, Yong Eun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (05) : 1284 - 1293
  • [28] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and midline lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis
    Wang, Yang-Yi
    Chung, Yu-Hsuan
    Huang, Chun-Hsien
    Hu, Ming-Hsien
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [29] Clinical Efficacy of Bilateral Decompression Using Biportal Endoscopic Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
    Song, Xin
    Ren, Zhinan
    Cao, Shuyan
    Zhou, Weiwei
    Hao, Yingjie
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 173 : E371 - E377
  • [30] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Isthmic Versus Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Mayo, Benjamin C.
    Shifflett, Grant D.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Louie, Philip K.
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Long, William W.
    Modi, Krishna D.
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (02): : 115 - 124