Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy Bilateral Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for One-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

被引:14
|
作者
Hua, Wenbin [1 ]
Wang, Bingjin [1 ]
Ke, Wencan [1 ]
Xiang, Qian [1 ]
Wu, Xinghuo [1 ]
Zhang, Yukun [1 ]
Li, Shuai [1 ]
Yang, Shuhua [1 ]
Wu, Qiang [1 ]
Yang, Cao [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Union Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2021年 / 7卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression; minimally invasive; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; lumbar spinal stenosis; degenerative spondylolisthesis;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2020.596327
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Both lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression (LE-ULBD) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) have been used to treat one-level lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with degenerative spondylolisthesis, while the differences of the clinical outcomes are still uncertain. Methods: Among 60 consecutive patients included, 24 surgeries were performed by LE-ULBD and 36 surgeries were performed by MI-TUF. Patient demographics, operation characteristics and complications were recorded. Sagittal parameters, including slip percentage (SP) and slip angle (SA) were compared. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and Macnab criteria were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Results: The estimated blood loss, time to ambulation and length of hospitalization of the LE-ULBD group were shorter than the MI-TUF group. Preoperative and final follow-up SP of the LE-ULBD group was of no significant difference, while final follow-up SP of the MI-TLIF group was significantly improved compared with preoperative SR The postoperative mean VAS and ODI scores decreased significantly in both LE-ULBD group and MI-TUF group. According to the modified Macnab criteria, the outcomes rated as excellent/good rate were 95.8 and 97.2%, respectively, in both LE-ULBD group and MI-TUF group. Intraoperative complication rate of the LE-ULBD and the MI-TLIF group were 4.2 and 0%, respectively. One case of intraoperative epineurium injury was observed in the LE-ULBD group. Postoperative complication rate of the LE-ULBD and the MI-TLIF group were 0 and 5.6%, respectively. One case with transient urinary retention and one case with pleural effusion were observed in the MI-TLIF group. Conclusion: Both LE-ULBD and MI-TLIF are safe and effective to treat one-level LSS with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Microendoscopic discectomy versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis
    Yi, Weihong
    Tang, Yu
    Yang, Dazhi
    Huang, Wenhua
    Liu, Huan
    Sun, Ziqi
    Yao, Yuan
    Zhou, Yue
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (24) : E20743
  • [32] Treatment of multilevel degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis using a combination of microendoscopic discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Wu, Han
    Yu, Wei-Dong
    Jiang, Rui
    Gao, Zhong-Li
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2013, 5 (02) : 567 - 571
  • [33] Comparative efficacy and fusion outcomes of unilateral bi-portal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treating single-segment degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a two-year retrospective study
    Bahir, Abdul Waheed
    Wang, Daxing
    Xiao, Jiayu
    Liu, Bailian
    Gu, Shao
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [34] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and spondylolisthesis
    Tsahtsarlis, Antonio
    Wood, Martin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (06) : 858 - 861
  • [35] Minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Jiang, Zhi-Kai
    Ge, Hong-Ping
    Jiang, Ting-Fei
    Ma, Huan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (10) : 1876 - 1876
  • [36] Clinical Evaluation of Paraspinal Mini-Tubular Lumbar Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Grade I with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Cohort Study
    Liang, Zeyan
    Xu, Xiongjie
    Rao, Jian
    Chen, Yan
    Wang, Rui
    Chen, Chunmei
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [37] Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Zhao, Xiao-bing
    Ma, Hai-jun
    Geng, Bin
    Zhou, Hong-gang
    Xia, Ya-yi
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (02) : 641 - 650
  • [38] Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MISTLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chandra, Vemula V. R.
    Prasad, Bodapati C. M.
    Hanu, Tammireddy G.
    Kale, Pavan G.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (01) : 127 - 134
  • [39] Minimally invasive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: transforaminal or oblique lumbar interbody fusion
    Sheng, Sun-Ren
    Geng, Yi-Bo
    Zhou, Kai-Liang
    Wu, Ai-Min
    Wang, Xiang-Yang
    Ni, Wen-Fei
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [40] Comparison of the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Diseases: A Matched Case-Control
    Shi, Liang
    Ding, Tao
    Shi, Yihua
    Wang, Fang
    Wu, Chengcong
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 167 : E1231 - E1240