Radiomics Analysis for Glioma Malignancy Evaluation Using Diffusion Kurtosis and Tensor Imaging

被引:36
|
作者
Takahashi, Satoshi [1 ]
Takahashi, Wataru [2 ]
Tanaka, Shota [1 ]
Haga, Akihiro [3 ]
Nakamoto, Takahiro [2 ]
Suzuki, Yuichi [2 ]
Mukasa, Akitake [4 ]
Takayanagi, Shunsaku [1 ]
Kitagawa, Yosuke [1 ]
Hana, Taijun [1 ]
Nejo, Takahide [1 ]
Nomura, Masashi [1 ]
Nakagawa, Keiichi [2 ]
Saito, Nobuhito [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Dept Neurosurg, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Univ Tokushima, Dept Med Image Informat Sci, Tokushima, Japan
[4] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Neurosurg, Kumamoto, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; MR SPECTROSCOPY; GRADE; CLASSIFICATION; FEATURES; TUMORS; IMAGES; BRAIN; MAPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: A noninvasive diagnostic method to predict the degree of malignancy accurately would be of great help in glioma management. This study aimed to create a highly accurate machine learning model to perform glioma grading. Methods and Materials: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging acquired for cases of glioma operated on at our institution from October 2014 through January 2018 were obtained retrospectively. Six types of magnetic resonance imaging sequences (T-2-weighted image, diffusion-weighted image, apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], fractional anisotropy, and mean kurtosis [MK]) were chosen for analysis; 476 features were extracted semiautomatically for each sequence (2856 features in total). Recursive feature elimination was used to select significant features for a machine learning model that distinguishes glioblastoma from lower-grade glioma (grades 2 and 3). Results: Fifty-five data sets from 54 cases were obtained (14 grade 2 gliomas, 12 grade 3 gliomas, and 29 glioblastomas), of which 44 and 11 data sets were used for machine learning and independent testing, respectively. We detected 504 features with significant differences (false discovery rate <0.05) between glioblastoma and lower-grade glioma. The most accurate machine learning model was created using 6 features extracted from the ADC and MK images. In the logistic regression, the area under the curve was 0.90 +/- 0.05, and the accuracy of the test data set was 0.91 (10 out of 11); using a support vector machine, they were 0.93 +/- 0.03 and 0.91 (10 out of 11), respectively (kernel, radial basis function; c = 1.0). Conclusions: Our machine learning model accurately predicted glioma tumor grade. The ADC and MK sequences produced particularly useful features. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 791
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diffusion Tensor and Kurtosis MRI-Based Radiomics Analysis of Kidney Injury in Type 2 Diabetes
    Yang, Daoyu
    Tian, Chong
    Liu, Jian
    Peng, Yunsong
    Xiong, Zhenliang
    Da, Jingjing
    Yang, Yuqi
    Zha, Yan
    Zeng, Xianchun
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 60 (05) : 2078 - 2087
  • [22] Diffusion Kurtosis and Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging in Parkinson Disease
    Giannelli, Marco
    Toschi, Nicola
    Passamonti, Luca
    Mascalchi, Mario
    Diciotti, Stefano
    Tessa, Carlo
    RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (02) : 645 - 646
  • [23] Evaluation of radiation necrosis and malignant glioma in rat models using diffusion tensor MR imaging
    Wang, Silun
    Chen, Yifei
    Lal, Bachchu
    Ford, Eric
    Tryggestad, Erik
    Armour, Michael
    Yan, Kun
    Laterra, John
    Zhou, Jinyuan
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 107 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [24] Evaluation of radiation necrosis and malignant glioma in rat models using diffusion tensor MR imaging
    Silun Wang
    Yifei Chen
    Bachchu Lal
    Eric Ford
    Erik Tryggestad
    Michael Armour
    Kun Yan
    John Laterra
    Jinyuan Zhou
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2012, 107 : 51 - 60
  • [25] DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING AND DIFFUSION KURTOSIS IMAGING AS BASES FOR STUDYING BRAIN TISSUE MICROSTRUCTURE
    Luhamaa, Erkki
    Kepler, Kalle
    Nigul, Mait
    Tomberg, Tiiu
    MEDICAL PHYSICS IN THE BALTIC STATES, 2015, : 86 - 89
  • [26] Optimal Gradient Encoding Schemes for Diffusion Tensor and Kurtosis Imaging
    Alipoor, Mohammad
    Gu, Irene Yu-Hua
    Maier, Stephan E.
    Starck, Goran
    Mehnert, Andrew
    Kahl, Fredrik
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL IMAGING, 2016, 2 (03): : 375 - 391
  • [27] Editorial for "Diffusion Tensor and Kurtosis MRI-Based Radiomics Analysis of Kidney Injury in Type 2 Diabetes"
    Zahergivar, Aryan
    Singh, Shiva
    Golagha, Mahshid
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 60 (05) : 2088 - 2089
  • [28] Evaluation of peripheral nerve acute crush injury in rabbits: comparison among diffusion kurtosis imaging, diffusion tensor imaging and electromyography
    Qi Wan
    Yudong Yu
    Yingying Bao
    Jianfeng Hu
    Peng Wang
    Yu Peng
    Xiaoying Xia
    Yuting Liao
    Jieqiong Liu
    Xiaobin Xie
    Xinchun Li
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2022, 35 : 291 - 299
  • [29] Use of diffusion tensor imaging in glioma resection
    Abdullah, Kalil G.
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Nucifora, Paolo G. P.
    Brem, Steven
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 34 (04)
  • [30] Evaluation of peripheral nerve acute crush injury in rabbits: comparison among diffusion kurtosis imaging, diffusion tensor imaging and electromyography
    Wan, Qi
    Yu, Yudong
    Bao, Yingying
    Hu, Jianfeng
    Wang, Peng
    Peng, Yu
    Xia, Xiaoying
    Liao, Yuting
    Liu, Jieqiong
    Xie, Xiaobin
    Li, Xinchun
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (02) : 291 - 299