Radiomics Analysis for Glioma Malignancy Evaluation Using Diffusion Kurtosis and Tensor Imaging

被引:36
|
作者
Takahashi, Satoshi [1 ]
Takahashi, Wataru [2 ]
Tanaka, Shota [1 ]
Haga, Akihiro [3 ]
Nakamoto, Takahiro [2 ]
Suzuki, Yuichi [2 ]
Mukasa, Akitake [4 ]
Takayanagi, Shunsaku [1 ]
Kitagawa, Yosuke [1 ]
Hana, Taijun [1 ]
Nejo, Takahide [1 ]
Nomura, Masashi [1 ]
Nakagawa, Keiichi [2 ]
Saito, Nobuhito [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Dept Neurosurg, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Univ Tokushima, Dept Med Image Informat Sci, Tokushima, Japan
[4] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Neurosurg, Kumamoto, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; MR SPECTROSCOPY; GRADE; CLASSIFICATION; FEATURES; TUMORS; IMAGES; BRAIN; MAPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: A noninvasive diagnostic method to predict the degree of malignancy accurately would be of great help in glioma management. This study aimed to create a highly accurate machine learning model to perform glioma grading. Methods and Materials: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging acquired for cases of glioma operated on at our institution from October 2014 through January 2018 were obtained retrospectively. Six types of magnetic resonance imaging sequences (T-2-weighted image, diffusion-weighted image, apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], fractional anisotropy, and mean kurtosis [MK]) were chosen for analysis; 476 features were extracted semiautomatically for each sequence (2856 features in total). Recursive feature elimination was used to select significant features for a machine learning model that distinguishes glioblastoma from lower-grade glioma (grades 2 and 3). Results: Fifty-five data sets from 54 cases were obtained (14 grade 2 gliomas, 12 grade 3 gliomas, and 29 glioblastomas), of which 44 and 11 data sets were used for machine learning and independent testing, respectively. We detected 504 features with significant differences (false discovery rate <0.05) between glioblastoma and lower-grade glioma. The most accurate machine learning model was created using 6 features extracted from the ADC and MK images. In the logistic regression, the area under the curve was 0.90 +/- 0.05, and the accuracy of the test data set was 0.91 (10 out of 11); using a support vector machine, they were 0.93 +/- 0.03 and 0.91 (10 out of 11), respectively (kernel, radial basis function; c = 1.0). Conclusions: Our machine learning model accurately predicted glioma tumor grade. The ADC and MK sequences produced particularly useful features. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 791
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Quantitative evaluation of diffusion tensor imaging for clinical management of glioma
    Li, Ye
    Zhang, Wenyao
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2020, 43 (03) : 881 - 891
  • [12] Glioma-Specific Diffusion Signature in Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging
    Hempel, Johann-Martin
    Brendle, Cornelia
    Adib, Sasan Darius
    Behling, Felix
    Tabatabai, Ghazaleh
    Castaneda Vega, Salvador
    Schittenhelm, Jens
    Ernemann, Ulrike
    Klose, Uwe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (11)
  • [13] Development of anisotropic phantoms using wood and fiber materials for diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging
    Masashi Suzuki
    Susumu Moriya
    Junichi Hata
    Atsushi Tachibana
    Atsushi Senoo
    Mamoru Niitsu
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2019, 32 : 539 - 547
  • [14] Development of anisotropic phantoms using wood and fiber materials for diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging
    Suzuki, Masashi
    Moriya, Susumu
    Hata, Junichi
    Tachibana, Atsushi
    Senoo, Atsushi
    Niitsu, Mamoru
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (05) : 539 - 547
  • [15] Comparative Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Detecting Cerebral Microstructural Changes in Alzheimer Disease
    Raj, Shashank
    Vyas, Sameer
    Modi, Manish
    Garg, Gaurav
    Singh, Paramjeet
    Kumar, Ajay
    Ahuja, Chirag Kamal
    Goyal, Manoj K.
    Govind, Varan
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 : S63 - S70
  • [16] Radiomics Analysis of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging: Distinguishing Between Glioblastoma and Single Brain Metastasis
    Gao, Eryuan
    Wang, Peipei
    Bai, Jie
    Ma, Xiaoyue
    Gao, Yufei
    Qi, Jinbo
    Zhao, Kai
    Zhang, Huiting
    Yan, Xu
    Yang, Guang
    Zhao, Guohua
    Cheng, Jingliang
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (03) : 1036 - 1043
  • [17] Erratum to: In vivo molecular profiling of human glioma using diffusion kurtosis imaging
    Johann-Martin Hempel
    Sotirios Bisdas
    Jens Schittenhelm
    Cornelia Brendle
    Benjamin Bender
    Henk Wassmann
    Marco Skardelly
    Ghazaleh Tabatabai
    Salvador Castaneda Vega
    Ulrike Ernemann
    Uwe Klose
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2017, 131 : 103 - 103
  • [18] Predicting patterns of glioma recurrence using diffusion tensor imaging
    Price, Stephen J.
    Jena, Rajesh
    Burnet, Neil G.
    Carpenter, T. Adrian
    Pickard, John D.
    Gillard, Jonathan H.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (07) : 1675 - 1684
  • [19] Predicting patterns of glioma recurrence using diffusion tensor imaging
    Stephen J. Price
    Rajesh Jena
    Neil G. Burnet
    T. Adrian Carpenter
    John D. Pickard
    Jonathan H. Gillard
    European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 1675 - 1684
  • [20] Quantitative analysis of glioma cell invasion by diffusion tensor imaging
    Deng, Zhaoxia
    Yan, Yi
    Zhong, Dong
    Yang, Gang
    Tang, Wenyuan
    Lue, Fajin
    Xie, Bing
    Liu, Bin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 17 (12) : 1530 - 1536