Does Preoperative Symptom Duration Impact Clinical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Setting?

被引:5
|
作者
Nie, James W. [1 ]
Hartman, Timothy J. [1 ]
MacGregor, Keith R. [1 ]
Oyetayo, Omolabake O. [1 ]
Zheng, Eileen [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Ambulatory; Inpatient; MCID; MIS-TLIF; Outpatient; PROMs; Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion; ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; SURGERY; PAIN; ASSOCIATION; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.055
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The effect of prolonged symptom duration in patients undergoing ambulatory MIS-TLIF on postoperative clinical outcomes has not been well studied. We aim to compare symptom duration of pain and/or weakness on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing outpatient MIS-TLIF. METHODS: Patients undergoing outpatient MIS-TLIF were gathered in a single-surgeon database. Exclusion criteria were patients missing onset of symptoms, date of surgery, or diagnosis of malignancy, trauma, or infection. Patients were grouped by symptoms <1 year or symptoms >= 1 year. Propensity score matching for demographics was utilized. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was calculated by comparing change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to previously established values. Inferential statistics for demographics, perioperative characteristics, PROMs, and MCID were utilized to compare between groups and/or postoperative improvement. RESULTS: After matching, there were a total of 56 patients, with 30 patients with symptoms <1-year. The <1-year cohort reported significant improvement in all time points in VAS back/leg and 12-week/6-months in ODI. The >= 1-year cohort demonstrated significant improvement in 6-month Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement - Information System Physical Function, 6-week to 1-year VAS back, 6-week VAS leg, and 6-month OW. The <1-year cohort had higher MCID attainment rates in 1-year VAS back/leg. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of symptom duration, patients reported significant improvement in back pain at all postoperative periods. Patients presenting with shorter symptom duration consistently reported significant improvement in leg pain postoperatively. Patients with shorter symptom duration demonstrated greater MCID achievement in back and leg pain. Patients indicated for outpatient MIS-TLIF may benefit more from earlier intervention following onset of symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:E599 / E606
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Meng Ge
    Yuan Zhang
    Hang Ying
    Chenchen Feng
    Yanlei Li
    Jinlong Tian
    Tingxiao Zhao
    Haiyu Shao
    Yazeng Huang
    International Orthopaedics, 2022, 46 : 2063 - 2070
  • [42] Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ge, Meng
    Zhang, Yuan
    Ying, Hang
    Feng, Chenchen
    Li, Yanlei
    Tian, Jinlong
    Zhao, Tingxiao
    Shao, Haiyu
    Huang, Yazeng
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 46 (09) : 2063 - 2070
  • [43] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITH EXPANDABLE CAGES
    Buckland, Aaron J.
    Proctor, Dylan J.
    JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [44] History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    NEUROSPINE, 2022, 19 (03) : 479 - 491
  • [45] Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis
    Massie, Lara W.
    Zakaria, Hesham Mostafa
    Schultz, Lonni R.
    Basheer, Azam
    Buraimoh, Morenikeji Ayodele
    Chang, Victor
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2018, 44 (01)
  • [46] Minimally invasive tubular surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kimball, Jon
    Yew, Andrew
    Getachew, Ruth
    Lu, Daniel C.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35
  • [47] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spine
    Chaudhary, Kshitij S.
    Groff, Michael W.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 26 (03) : 146 - 155
  • [48] The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Lawton, C. D.
    Smith, Z. A.
    Barnawi, A.
    Fessler, R. G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 55 (03) : 259 - 264
  • [49] Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive surgery during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion/posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Heary, Robert F.
    Kaiser, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 24 (03) : 413 - 414
  • [50] Association of Preoperative Physical Function and Changes in Mental Health After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Parrish, James M.
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Jadczak, Caroline N.
    Mohan, Shruthi
    Geoghegan, Cara E.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (06): : 1115 - 1122