Does Preoperative Symptom Duration Impact Clinical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Setting?

被引:5
|
作者
Nie, James W. [1 ]
Hartman, Timothy J. [1 ]
MacGregor, Keith R. [1 ]
Oyetayo, Omolabake O. [1 ]
Zheng, Eileen [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Ambulatory; Inpatient; MCID; MIS-TLIF; Outpatient; PROMs; Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion; ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; SURGERY; PAIN; ASSOCIATION; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.055
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The effect of prolonged symptom duration in patients undergoing ambulatory MIS-TLIF on postoperative clinical outcomes has not been well studied. We aim to compare symptom duration of pain and/or weakness on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing outpatient MIS-TLIF. METHODS: Patients undergoing outpatient MIS-TLIF were gathered in a single-surgeon database. Exclusion criteria were patients missing onset of symptoms, date of surgery, or diagnosis of malignancy, trauma, or infection. Patients were grouped by symptoms <1 year or symptoms >= 1 year. Propensity score matching for demographics was utilized. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was calculated by comparing change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to previously established values. Inferential statistics for demographics, perioperative characteristics, PROMs, and MCID were utilized to compare between groups and/or postoperative improvement. RESULTS: After matching, there were a total of 56 patients, with 30 patients with symptoms <1-year. The <1-year cohort reported significant improvement in all time points in VAS back/leg and 12-week/6-months in ODI. The >= 1-year cohort demonstrated significant improvement in 6-month Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement - Information System Physical Function, 6-week to 1-year VAS back, 6-week VAS leg, and 6-month OW. The <1-year cohort had higher MCID attainment rates in 1-year VAS back/leg. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of symptom duration, patients reported significant improvement in back pain at all postoperative periods. Patients presenting with shorter symptom duration consistently reported significant improvement in leg pain postoperatively. Patients with shorter symptom duration demonstrated greater MCID achievement in back and leg pain. Patients indicated for outpatient MIS-TLIF may benefit more from earlier intervention following onset of symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:E599 / E606
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Elboghdady, Islam M.
    Naqvi, Abbas
    Jorgenson, Anton Y.
    Marquez-Lara, Alejandro
    Singh, Kern
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (10)
  • [22] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and spondylolisthesis
    Tsahtsarlis, Antonio
    Wood, Martin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (06) : 858 - 861
  • [23] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
    Badlani, Neil
    Yu, Elizabeth
    Kreitz, Tyler
    Khan, Safdar
    Kurd, Mark F.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (02): : 62 - 64
  • [24] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
    Lee, Won-chul
    Park, Jeong-Yoon
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Kuh, Sung Uk
    Chin, Dong Kyu
    Kim, Keun Su
    Cho, Yong Eun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 85 : 236 - 243
  • [25] Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease
    Li, Hui-Min
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 : E627 - E638
  • [26] Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion via a novel tubular retractor
    Wang, Yan
    Zhang, Yaqing
    Chong, Fanli
    Zhou, Yue
    Huang, Bo
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (05)
  • [27] Comparison of the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Diseases: A Matched Case-Control
    Shi, Liang
    Ding, Tao
    Shi, Yihua
    Wang, Fang
    Wu, Chengcong
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 167 : E1231 - E1240
  • [28] Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lin, Guang-Xun
    Park, Chun-Kun
    Hur, Jung-Woo
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2019, 59 (06) : 222 - 230
  • [29] Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhou, Chuanli
    Wang, Chao
    Zhu, Kai
    Tu, Qihao
    Kong, Meng
    Zhao, Chong
    Ma, Xuexiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 549 - 558
  • [30] Time Taken to Return to Work Does Not Influence Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Liow, Ming Han Lincoln
    Goh, Graham Seow-Hng
    Yeo, William
    Ling, Zhixing Marcus
    Yue, Wai-Mun
    Guo, Chang Ming
    Tan, Seang Beng
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (07) : 503 - 509