Does Preoperative Symptom Duration Impact Clinical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Setting?

被引:5
|
作者
Nie, James W. [1 ]
Hartman, Timothy J. [1 ]
MacGregor, Keith R. [1 ]
Oyetayo, Omolabake O. [1 ]
Zheng, Eileen [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Ambulatory; Inpatient; MCID; MIS-TLIF; Outpatient; PROMs; Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion; ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; SURGERY; PAIN; ASSOCIATION; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.055
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The effect of prolonged symptom duration in patients undergoing ambulatory MIS-TLIF on postoperative clinical outcomes has not been well studied. We aim to compare symptom duration of pain and/or weakness on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing outpatient MIS-TLIF. METHODS: Patients undergoing outpatient MIS-TLIF were gathered in a single-surgeon database. Exclusion criteria were patients missing onset of symptoms, date of surgery, or diagnosis of malignancy, trauma, or infection. Patients were grouped by symptoms <1 year or symptoms >= 1 year. Propensity score matching for demographics was utilized. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was calculated by comparing change in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to previously established values. Inferential statistics for demographics, perioperative characteristics, PROMs, and MCID were utilized to compare between groups and/or postoperative improvement. RESULTS: After matching, there were a total of 56 patients, with 30 patients with symptoms <1-year. The <1-year cohort reported significant improvement in all time points in VAS back/leg and 12-week/6-months in ODI. The >= 1-year cohort demonstrated significant improvement in 6-month Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement - Information System Physical Function, 6-week to 1-year VAS back, 6-week VAS leg, and 6-month OW. The <1-year cohort had higher MCID attainment rates in 1-year VAS back/leg. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of symptom duration, patients reported significant improvement in back pain at all postoperative periods. Patients presenting with shorter symptom duration consistently reported significant improvement in leg pain postoperatively. Patients with shorter symptom duration demonstrated greater MCID achievement in back and leg pain. Patients indicated for outpatient MIS-TLIF may benefit more from earlier intervention following onset of symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:E599 / E606
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does Preoperative Back Pain Impact Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis?
    Nie, James W.
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    Zheng, Eileen
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    MacGregor, Keith R.
    Federico, Vincent P.
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Sayari, Arash J.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (05): : E179 - E184
  • [32] Reduced Acute Care Costs With the ERAS® Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Conventional Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Chang, Hsuan Kan
    Grossman, Jay
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 83 (04) : 827 - 834
  • [33] How Does Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Influence Lumbar Radiologic Parameters?
    Pereira, Claudia
    Silva, Pedro Santos
    Cunha, Marisa
    Vaz, Rui
    Pereira, Paulo
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 116 : E895 - E902
  • [34] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-indications and clinical experience
    Hari, Akshay
    Krishna, Murali
    Rajagandhi, Santhosh
    Rajakumar, Deshpande V.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2016, 64 (03) : 444 - 454
  • [35] Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Keorochana, Gun
    Setrkraising, Kitipong
    Woratanarat, Patarawan
    Arirachakaran, Alisara
    Kongtharvonskul, Jatupon
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2018, 41 (03) : 755 - 770
  • [36] Are Patient-Reported Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Influenced by Preoperative Mental Health?
    Goh, Graham S.
    Liow, Ming Han Lincoln
    Yue, Wai-Mun
    Tan, Seang-Beng
    Chen, John Li-Tat
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (04) : 500 - 508
  • [37] Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gun Keorochana
    Kitipong Setrkraising
    Patarawan Woratanarat
    Alisara Arirachakaran
    Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
    Neurosurgical Review, 2018, 41 : 755 - 770
  • [38] Factors associated with readmission after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Tumialan, Luis M.
    Weinstein, Nolan
    Farber, S. Harrison
    Desai, Shashvat M.
    Marciano, Frederick F.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 38 (06) : 681 - 687
  • [39] Subsidence of Polyetheretherketone Cage After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Kim, Moon-Chan
    Chung, Hung-Tae
    Cho, Jae-Lim
    Kim, Dong-Jun
    Chung, Nam-Su
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2013, 26 (02): : 87 - 92
  • [40] Temporal Trends of Improvement After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Shahi, Pratyush
    Subramanian, Tejas
    Tuma, Olivia
    Singh, Sumedha
    Araghi, Kasra
    Asada, Tomoyuki
    Korsun, Maximilian
    Singh, Nishtha
    Simon, Chad
    Vaishnav, Avani
    Mai, Eric
    Zhang, Joshua
    Kwas, Cole
    Allen, Myles
    Kim, Eric
    Heuer, Annika
    Sheha, Evan
    Dowdell, James
    Qureshi, Sheeraz
    Iyer, Sravisht
    SPINE, 2025, 50 (02) : 81 - 87