Techno-economic evaluation of methanol production via gasification of vacuum residue and conventional reforming routes

被引:11
|
作者
Al-Rowaili, Fayez Nasir [1 ,2 ]
Khalafalla, Siddig S. [1 ]
Al-Yami, Dhaffer S. [2 ]
Jamal, Aqil [2 ]
Ahmed, Usama [1 ,3 ]
Zahid, Umer [1 ,4 ]
Al-Mutairi, Eid M. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Chem Engn Dept, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[2] Saudi Aramco, Res & Dev Ctr, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Hydrogen & Energy Stora, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Membranes & Water Secur, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Refining & Adv Chem, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
来源
关键词
Methanol; Carbon capture and utilization; Vacuum residue gasification; Economic analysis; Process simulation; NATURAL-GAS; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; FUEL-OIL; SIMULATION; CO2; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2021.11.004
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The continuous rise of global carbon emissions demands the utilization of fossil fuels in a cleaner and sustainable way. Gasification is a potential technology that can convert the dirty fossil fuels for the production of clean and environment friendly fuels in an economical manner. In this study, vacuum residue is employed as a feedstock to produce high grade methanol. A vacuum residue to methanol (VRTM) process is simulated using Aspen Plus for a methanol production capacity of 90 t/h with 99.9 wt.% purity. The developed VRTM process is bench-marked with the conventional steam reforming to methanol (SRTM) process through energy, environmental and economic analysis. The performance of vacuum residue gasifier, natural gas reformer and the methanol synthesis reactor are validated against the plant data and the simulation results are found to be in good agreement. The results showed that the VRTM process offers a process energy efficiency of 49.5% which is 1.6% higher than the SRTM process. The unit cost of methanol product from the VRTM process is $ 317/tCH(3)OH which is 14% lower compared to the SRTM process. In terms of environmental analysis, SRTM process emits less carbon emissions than the VRTM process. However, the VRTM process offers a high purity captured CO2 stream that can be utilized for another application that can further offset the methanol production cost. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 375
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Power and biogas to methanol - A techno-economic analysis of carbon-maximized green methanol production via two reforming approaches
    Bube, Stefan
    Sens, Lucas
    Drawer, Chris
    Kaltschmitt, Martin
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 304
  • [12] Thermodynamic and Techno-Economic Performance Comparison of Methanol Aqueous Phase Reforming and Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production
    Hu, Changsong
    Xu, Chao
    Xi, Xiaojun
    He, Yao
    Wang, Tiejun
    ENERGIES, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [13] Methanol production via integrated methane reforming and chemical looping combustion: Process simulation and techno-economic assessment
    Labbaf, Babak
    Tabatabaei, Mojgan
    Mostafavi, Ehsan
    Tijani, Mansour
    Mahinpey, Nader
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2021, 148 : 1346 - 1356
  • [14] Comparative techno-economic analysis of biohydrogen production via bio-oil gasification and bio-oil reforming
    Zhang, Yanan
    Brown, Tristan R.
    Hu, Guiping
    Brown, Robert C.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 51 : 99 - 108
  • [15] Techno-economic evaluation of pyrolysis and electrolysis integration for methanol and char production
    Nakashima, Rafael Nogueira
    Nami, Hossein
    Nemati, Arash
    Butera, Giacomo
    de Oliveira Junior, Silvio
    Hendriksen, Peter Vang
    Frandsen, Henrik Lund
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2025, 242
  • [16] A techno-economic review of biomass gasification for production of chemicals
    Wang, Shu-Wen
    Li, De-Xun
    Ruan, Wen-Biao
    Jin, Chen-Lin
    Farahani, Mohammad Reza
    ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2018, 13 (08) : 351 - 356
  • [17] Methanol production via black liquor co-gasification with expanded raw material base - Techno-economic assessment
    Carvalho, Lara
    Lundgren, Joakim
    Wetterlund, Elisabeth
    Wolf, Jens
    Furusjo, Erik
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 225 : 570 - 584
  • [18] Techno-economic evaluation of a mechanical pulp mill with gasification
    He, Jie
    Engstrand, Per
    Bjorkqvist, Olof
    Zhang, Wennan
    NORDIC PULP & PAPER RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2013, 28 (03) : 349 - 357
  • [19] TECHNO-ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF RESIDUE EXHAUSTION IN BATCH RECTIFICATION ETHANOL PRODUCTION PLANT
    Jacimovic, Branislav M.
    Genic, Srbislav B.
    Budimir, Nikola J.
    Jaric, Marko S.
    THERMAL SCIENCE, 2017, 21 (06): : 2971 - 2980