Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) - Technical feasibility and initial results

被引:394
|
作者
Schwender, JD
Holly, LT
Rouben, DP
Foley, KT
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Semmes Murphey Clin, Memphis, TN 38104 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Neurosurg, Memphis, TN 38104 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Twin Cities Spine Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Orthoped Surg, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Div Neurosurg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] River City Orthopaed Surg, Louisville, KY USA
关键词
lumbar; fusion; minimally invasive; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion;
D O I
10.1097/01.bsd.0000132291.50455.d0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Forty-nine patients underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from October 2001 to August 2002 (minimum 18-month follow-up). The diagnosis was degenerative disc disease with herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) in 26, spondylolisthesis in 22, and a Chance-type seatbelt fracture in 1. The majority of cases (n = 45) were at L4-L5 or L5-S1. A paramedian, muscle-sparing approach was performed through a tubular retractor docked unilaterally on the facet joint. A total facetectomy was then conducted, exposing the disc space. Discectomy and endplate preparation were completed through the tube using customized surgical instruments. Structural support was achieved with allograft bone or interbody cages. Bone grafting was done with local autologous or allograft bone, augmented with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in some cases. Bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw-rod placement was accomplished with the Sextant system. There were no conversions to open surgery. Operative time averaged 240 minutes. Estimated blood loss averaged 140 mL. Mean length of hospital stay was 1.9 days. All patients presenting with preoperative radiculopathy (n = 45) had resolution of symptoms postoperatively. Complications included two instances of screw malposition requiring screw repositioning and two cases of new radiculopathy postoperatively (one from graft dislodgement, the other from contralateral neuroforaminal stenosis). Narcotic use was discontinued 2-4 weeks postoperatively. Improvements in average Visual Analogue Pain Scale and Oswestry Disability Index (preoperative to last follow-up) scores were 7.2-2.1 and 46-14, respectively. At last follow-up, all patients had solid fusions by radiographic criteria. Results of this study indicate that minimally invasive TLIF is feasible and offers several potential advantages over traditional open techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:S1 / S6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE DISEASE
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Sharma, Arvind
    Singh, Jitendra
    Deen, Shameer
    Tanwar, Akansha
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (105): : 17055 - 17057
  • [42] The feasibility for a novel minimally invasive surgery–percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a cadaveric experiment
    Peng Yin
    Yaoshen Zhang
    Aixing Pan
    Yi Ding
    Liming Zhang
    Chunyang Xu
    Jincai Yang
    Yong Hai
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [43] Comparison of midline lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar degeneration disease
    Zhang, Xuelei
    Zhang, Yu
    Gu, Zuchao
    Li, Guo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [44] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Two Techniques
    Tender, G. C.
    Serban, D.
    CHIRURGIA, 2014, 109 (06) : 812 - 821
  • [45] Learning curve and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Silva, Pedro S.
    Pereira, Paulo
    Monteiro, Pedro
    Silva, Pedro A.
    Vaz, Rui
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (02)
  • [46] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Easley, Kirk
    Lee, Jun-Seok
    Hong, Jae-Young
    Virk, Michael
    Hsieh, Patrick C.
    Yoon, Sangwook T.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 : 143S - 150S
  • [47] Pearls: Improving Upon Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Qureshi, Sheeraz
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 477 (03) : 501 - 505
  • [48] Intraoperative electromyography monitoring in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Bindal, Rajesh K.
    Ghosh, Subrata
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 6 (02) : 126 - 132
  • [49] Pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Luo, Peng
    Wu, Jia
    Mao, Guang-Yun
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2014, 36 (06)
  • [50] Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Geriatric Patients
    Hsieh, Cheng-Ta
    Sun, Jui-Ming
    Chen, Yuan -Shen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY, 2023, 17 (03) : 195 - 200