Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) - Technical feasibility and initial results

被引:394
|
作者
Schwender, JD
Holly, LT
Rouben, DP
Foley, KT
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Semmes Murphey Clin, Memphis, TN 38104 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Neurosurg, Memphis, TN 38104 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Twin Cities Spine Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Orthoped Surg, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Div Neurosurg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] River City Orthopaed Surg, Louisville, KY USA
关键词
lumbar; fusion; minimally invasive; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion;
D O I
10.1097/01.bsd.0000132291.50455.d0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Forty-nine patients underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from October 2001 to August 2002 (minimum 18-month follow-up). The diagnosis was degenerative disc disease with herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) in 26, spondylolisthesis in 22, and a Chance-type seatbelt fracture in 1. The majority of cases (n = 45) were at L4-L5 or L5-S1. A paramedian, muscle-sparing approach was performed through a tubular retractor docked unilaterally on the facet joint. A total facetectomy was then conducted, exposing the disc space. Discectomy and endplate preparation were completed through the tube using customized surgical instruments. Structural support was achieved with allograft bone or interbody cages. Bone grafting was done with local autologous or allograft bone, augmented with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in some cases. Bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw-rod placement was accomplished with the Sextant system. There were no conversions to open surgery. Operative time averaged 240 minutes. Estimated blood loss averaged 140 mL. Mean length of hospital stay was 1.9 days. All patients presenting with preoperative radiculopathy (n = 45) had resolution of symptoms postoperatively. Complications included two instances of screw malposition requiring screw repositioning and two cases of new radiculopathy postoperatively (one from graft dislodgement, the other from contralateral neuroforaminal stenosis). Narcotic use was discontinued 2-4 weeks postoperatively. Improvements in average Visual Analogue Pain Scale and Oswestry Disability Index (preoperative to last follow-up) scores were 7.2-2.1 and 46-14, respectively. At last follow-up, all patients had solid fusions by radiographic criteria. Results of this study indicate that minimally invasive TLIF is feasible and offers several potential advantages over traditional open techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:S1 / S6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Lawton, C. D.
    Smith, Z. A.
    Barnawi, A.
    Fessler, R. G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 55 (03) : 259 - 264
  • [32] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Outpatient Setting
    Emami, Arash
    Faloon, Michael
    Issa, Kimona
    Shafa, Eiman
    Pourtaheri, Sina
    Sinha, Kumar
    Hwang, Ki S.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (06) : E1218 - E1222
  • [33] Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion for Revision Lumbar Surgery Technical Feasibility and Safety
    Selznick, Lee A.
    Shamji, Mohammed F.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2009, 22 (03): : 207 - 213
  • [34] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and midline lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis
    Wang, Yang-Yi
    Chung, Yu-Hsuan
    Huang, Chun-Hsien
    Hu, Ming-Hsien
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [35] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (mini-TLIF) in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease
    Cusnir, I.
    Bodiu, A.
    Plesca, S.
    Sangheli, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2015, 22 : 795 - 795
  • [36] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Spondylolisthesis in 282 Patients: In Situ Arthrodesis versus Reduction
    Scheer, Justin K.
    Auffinger, Brenda
    Wong, Ricky H.
    Lam, Sandi K.
    Lawton, Cort D.
    Nixon, Alexander T.
    Dahdaleh, Nader S.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    Fessler, Richard G.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (01) : 108 - 113
  • [37] Minimization of lumbar interbody fusion by percutaneous full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF), and its minimally invasiveness comparison with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF)
    Ito, Kenyu
    Ito, Zenya
    Nakamura, Shu
    Ito, Fujio
    Shibayama, Motohide
    Miura, Yasushi
    INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 34
  • [38] Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Intermediate Results and Complications
    Hey, Hwee Weng Dennis
    Hee, Hwan Tak
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (02) : 185 - 193
  • [39] Perioperative Complications of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): 10 Years of Experience With MI-TLIF
    Patel, Jwalant
    Kundnani, Vishal
    Raut, Saijyot
    Meena, Mohit
    Ruparel, Sameer
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (05) : 733 - 739
  • [40] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Fan Shunwu
    Zhao Xing
    Zhao Fengdong
    Fang Xiangqian
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (17) : 1615 - 1620