Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) - Technical feasibility and initial results

被引:394
|
作者
Schwender, JD
Holly, LT
Rouben, DP
Foley, KT
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Semmes Murphey Clin, Memphis, TN 38104 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Neurosurg, Memphis, TN 38104 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Twin Cities Spine Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Orthoped Surg, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Div Neurosurg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] River City Orthopaed Surg, Louisville, KY USA
关键词
lumbar; fusion; minimally invasive; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion;
D O I
10.1097/01.bsd.0000132291.50455.d0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Forty-nine patients underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from October 2001 to August 2002 (minimum 18-month follow-up). The diagnosis was degenerative disc disease with herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) in 26, spondylolisthesis in 22, and a Chance-type seatbelt fracture in 1. The majority of cases (n = 45) were at L4-L5 or L5-S1. A paramedian, muscle-sparing approach was performed through a tubular retractor docked unilaterally on the facet joint. A total facetectomy was then conducted, exposing the disc space. Discectomy and endplate preparation were completed through the tube using customized surgical instruments. Structural support was achieved with allograft bone or interbody cages. Bone grafting was done with local autologous or allograft bone, augmented with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in some cases. Bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw-rod placement was accomplished with the Sextant system. There were no conversions to open surgery. Operative time averaged 240 minutes. Estimated blood loss averaged 140 mL. Mean length of hospital stay was 1.9 days. All patients presenting with preoperative radiculopathy (n = 45) had resolution of symptoms postoperatively. Complications included two instances of screw malposition requiring screw repositioning and two cases of new radiculopathy postoperatively (one from graft dislodgement, the other from contralateral neuroforaminal stenosis). Narcotic use was discontinued 2-4 weeks postoperatively. Improvements in average Visual Analogue Pain Scale and Oswestry Disability Index (preoperative to last follow-up) scores were 7.2-2.1 and 46-14, respectively. At last follow-up, all patients had solid fusions by radiographic criteria. Results of this study indicate that minimally invasive TLIF is feasible and offers several potential advantages over traditional open techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:S1 / S6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
    Badlani, Neil
    Yu, Elizabeth
    Kreitz, Tyler
    Khan, Safdar
    Kurd, Mark F.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (02): : 62 - 64
  • [2] Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
    Ozgur, BM
    Yoo, K
    Rodriguez, G
    Taylor, WR
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (09) : 887 - 894
  • [3] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF)
    Saela, Stephen
    Pompliano, Michael
    Varghese, Jeffrey
    Sinha, Kumar
    Faloon, Michael
    Emami, Arash
    JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [4] Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
    Burak M. Ozgur
    Kevin Yoo
    Gerardo Rodriguez
    William R. Taylor
    European Spine Journal, 2005, 14 : 887 - 894
  • [5] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature
    Vazan, Martin
    Gempt, Jens
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Buchmann, Niels
    Ryang, Yu-Mi
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2017, 159 (06) : 1137 - 1146
  • [6] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (06): : 222 - 225
  • [7] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Hoffmann, Christoph-Heinrich
    Kandziora, Frank
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 32 (03): : 180 - 191
  • [8] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature
    Martin Vazan
    Jens Gempt
    Bernhard Meyer
    Niels Buchmann
    Yu- Mi Ryang
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2017, 159 : 1137 - 1146
  • [9] Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases
    Tian Y.
    Liu X.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2016, 26 (7) : 745 - 751
  • [10] TLIF - Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Figueiredo, N
    Martins, JWG
    Arruda, AA
    Serra, AR
    Figueiredo, MAA
    Diniz, RC
    Cavicchioli, AA
    ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2004, 62 (3B) : 815 - 820