Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Contribute to Primary Care Performance Measurement: a Mixed Methods Approach

被引:6
|
作者
Keller, San [1 ]
Dy, Sydney [2 ,3 ]
Wilson, Renee [2 ]
Dukhanin, Vadim [2 ]
Snyder, Claire [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Albert [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Inst Res Behav & Social Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27517 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
primary care; patient-reported outcome measures; performance measurement; patient-centered care; PROM; PRO-PM; multiple chronic conditions; MCCs; MEASUREMENT INFORMATION-SYSTEM; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING SCALE; HEALTH SURVEY SF-36; FUNCTION ITEM BANK; CHRONIC DISEASE SCALE; SELF-EFFICACY; TASK-FORCE; PAIN INTERFERENCE; CLINICAL VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-020-05811-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
New models of primary care include patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to promote patient-centered care. PROMs provide information on patient functional status and well-being, can be used to enhance care quality, and are proposed for use in assessing performance. Our objective was to identify a short list of candidate PROMs for use in primary care practice and to serve as a basis for performance measures (PMs). We used qualitative and quantitative methods to identify relevant patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains for use in performance measurement (PRO-PM) and their associated PROMs. We collected data from key informant groups: patients (n = 13; one-on-one and group interviews; concept saturation analysis), clinical thought leaders (n = 9; group discussions; thematic analysis), primary care practices representatives (n = 37; six focus groups; thematic analysis), and primary care payer representatives (n = 10; 12-question survey; frequencies of responses). We merged the key informant group information with findings from environmental literature scans. We conducted a targeted evidence review of measurement properties for candidate PROMs. We used a scoping review and key informant groups to identify PROM evaluation criteria, which were linked to the National Quality Forum measure evaluation criteria. We developed a de novo schema to score candidate PROMs against our criteria. We identified four PRO domains and 10 candidate PROMs: 3 for depressive symptoms, 2 for physical function, 3 for self-efficacy, 2 for ability to participate. Five PROMs met >= 70% of the evidence criteria for three PRO domains: PHQ-9 or PROMIS Depression (depression), PF-10 or PROMIS-PF (physical functioning), and PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Treatments and Medications (self-efficacy). The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities met 68% of our criteria and might be considered for inclusion. Existing evidence and key informant data identified 5 candidate PROMs to use in primary care. These instruments can be used to develop PRO-PMs.
引用
收藏
页码:2687 / 2697
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOR NOCTURIA
    Bower, W.
    Rose, G.
    Denys, M.
    Kumps, C.
    Whishaw, M.
    Khan, F.
    Everaert, K.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2017, 36 : S415 - S416
  • [42] Patient-reported outcome measures and orthodontics
    Ryan, Fiona S.
    Cunningham, Susan J.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 45 (02) : 63 - 64
  • [43] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Perspective
    Zura, Robert
    Steen, R. Grant
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 41 (01) : 10 - 11
  • [44] Patient-reported outcome measures in orthopaedics
    Hansen, Stine Thestrup
    Jensen, Rasmus Stig
    Holm, Henriette Appel
    Liljensoe, Anette
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 71 (11):
  • [45] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Endometriosis
    Nicolas-Boluda, Alba
    Oppenheimer, Anne
    Bouaziz, Jerome
    Fauconnier, Arnaud
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)
  • [46] Standards for Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Performance Measures
    Basch, Ethan
    Torda, Phyllis
    Adams, Karen
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (02): : 139 - 140
  • [47] Clinician perceptions of nomothetic and individualized patient-reported outcome measures in measurement-based care
    Bugatti, Matteo
    Boswell, James F.
    PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2022, 32 (07) : 898 - 909
  • [48] Patient-reported outcome measures for diabetes self-care: A systematic review of measurement properties
    Lee, Jiyeon
    Lee, Eun-Hyun
    Chae, Duckhee
    Kim, Chun-Ja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 105
  • [49] Using patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures to elevate the quality of healthcare
    Casaca, Pedro
    Schafer, Willemijn
    Nunes, Ana Beatriz
    Sousa, Paulo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 35 (04)
  • [50] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pruritus: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Schoch, Dominic
    Sommer, Rachel
    Augustin, Matthias
    Staender, Sonja
    Blome, Christine
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 137 (10) : 2069 - 2077