Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Contribute to Primary Care Performance Measurement: a Mixed Methods Approach

被引:6
|
作者
Keller, San [1 ]
Dy, Sydney [2 ,3 ]
Wilson, Renee [2 ]
Dukhanin, Vadim [2 ]
Snyder, Claire [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Albert [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Inst Res Behav & Social Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27517 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
primary care; patient-reported outcome measures; performance measurement; patient-centered care; PROM; PRO-PM; multiple chronic conditions; MCCs; MEASUREMENT INFORMATION-SYSTEM; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING SCALE; HEALTH SURVEY SF-36; FUNCTION ITEM BANK; CHRONIC DISEASE SCALE; SELF-EFFICACY; TASK-FORCE; PAIN INTERFERENCE; CLINICAL VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-020-05811-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
New models of primary care include patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to promote patient-centered care. PROMs provide information on patient functional status and well-being, can be used to enhance care quality, and are proposed for use in assessing performance. Our objective was to identify a short list of candidate PROMs for use in primary care practice and to serve as a basis for performance measures (PMs). We used qualitative and quantitative methods to identify relevant patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains for use in performance measurement (PRO-PM) and their associated PROMs. We collected data from key informant groups: patients (n = 13; one-on-one and group interviews; concept saturation analysis), clinical thought leaders (n = 9; group discussions; thematic analysis), primary care practices representatives (n = 37; six focus groups; thematic analysis), and primary care payer representatives (n = 10; 12-question survey; frequencies of responses). We merged the key informant group information with findings from environmental literature scans. We conducted a targeted evidence review of measurement properties for candidate PROMs. We used a scoping review and key informant groups to identify PROM evaluation criteria, which were linked to the National Quality Forum measure evaluation criteria. We developed a de novo schema to score candidate PROMs against our criteria. We identified four PRO domains and 10 candidate PROMs: 3 for depressive symptoms, 2 for physical function, 3 for self-efficacy, 2 for ability to participate. Five PROMs met >= 70% of the evidence criteria for three PRO domains: PHQ-9 or PROMIS Depression (depression), PF-10 or PROMIS-PF (physical functioning), and PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Treatments and Medications (self-efficacy). The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities met 68% of our criteria and might be considered for inclusion. Existing evidence and key informant data identified 5 candidate PROMs to use in primary care. These instruments can be used to develop PRO-PMs.
引用
收藏
页码:2687 / 2697
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] REVIEW OF TERMINOLOGY OF MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES FOR PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES
    Rabenda, V.
    Leclercq, V.
    Reginster, J. Y.
    Bruyere, O.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 29 : S494 - S494
  • [22] Evaluating Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Glaucoma
    Vinokurtseva, Anastasiya
    Quinn, Matthew P.
    Wai, Mandy
    Leung, Victoria
    Malvankar-Mehta, Monali
    Hutnik, Cindy M. L.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2023, 6 (05): : 541 - 563
  • [23] Checklist to operationalize measurement characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures
    Francis D.O.
    McPheeters M.L.
    Noud M.
    Penson D.F.
    Feurer I.D.
    Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [24] Patient Satisfaction with Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care
    Pablo F. Recinos
    Cheryl J. Dunphy
    Nicolas Thompson
    Jesse Schuschu
    John L. Urchek
    Irene L. Katzan
    Advances in Therapy, 2017, 34 : 452 - 465
  • [25] Patient Satisfaction with Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care
    Recinos, Pablo F.
    Dunphy, Cheryl J.
    Thompson, Nicolas
    Schuschu, Jesse
    Urchek, John L., III
    Katzan, Irene L.
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2017, 34 (02) : 452 - 465
  • [26] EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF TRANSLATING PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES
    McKenna, S. P.
    Hagell, P.
    Hedin, P. J.
    Nyberg, L.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (07) : A236 - A236
  • [27] Considerations and Challenges in Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials in Nephrology
    Ju, Angela
    Tong, Allison
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 12 (11): : 1882 - 1884
  • [28] Patient-reported outcome measures for acne: a mixed-methods validation study (acne PROMs)
    Hornsey, Samantha
    Stuart, Beth
    Muller, Ingrid
    Layton, Alison M.
    Morrison, Leanne
    King, Jamie
    Thomas, Karen
    Little, Paul
    Santer, Miriam
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (03):
  • [29] Patient-reported outcome measurement
    Goodare, Heather
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2010, 103 (07) : 264 - 264
  • [30] Conscientious use of patient-reported outcome measures in supportive care
    Smith, Derek K.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2023, 31 (04)