Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Contribute to Primary Care Performance Measurement: a Mixed Methods Approach

被引:6
|
作者
Keller, San [1 ]
Dy, Sydney [2 ,3 ]
Wilson, Renee [2 ]
Dukhanin, Vadim [2 ]
Snyder, Claire [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Albert [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Inst Res Behav & Social Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27517 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
primary care; patient-reported outcome measures; performance measurement; patient-centered care; PROM; PRO-PM; multiple chronic conditions; MCCs; MEASUREMENT INFORMATION-SYSTEM; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING SCALE; HEALTH SURVEY SF-36; FUNCTION ITEM BANK; CHRONIC DISEASE SCALE; SELF-EFFICACY; TASK-FORCE; PAIN INTERFERENCE; CLINICAL VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-020-05811-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
New models of primary care include patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to promote patient-centered care. PROMs provide information on patient functional status and well-being, can be used to enhance care quality, and are proposed for use in assessing performance. Our objective was to identify a short list of candidate PROMs for use in primary care practice and to serve as a basis for performance measures (PMs). We used qualitative and quantitative methods to identify relevant patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains for use in performance measurement (PRO-PM) and their associated PROMs. We collected data from key informant groups: patients (n = 13; one-on-one and group interviews; concept saturation analysis), clinical thought leaders (n = 9; group discussions; thematic analysis), primary care practices representatives (n = 37; six focus groups; thematic analysis), and primary care payer representatives (n = 10; 12-question survey; frequencies of responses). We merged the key informant group information with findings from environmental literature scans. We conducted a targeted evidence review of measurement properties for candidate PROMs. We used a scoping review and key informant groups to identify PROM evaluation criteria, which were linked to the National Quality Forum measure evaluation criteria. We developed a de novo schema to score candidate PROMs against our criteria. We identified four PRO domains and 10 candidate PROMs: 3 for depressive symptoms, 2 for physical function, 3 for self-efficacy, 2 for ability to participate. Five PROMs met >= 70% of the evidence criteria for three PRO domains: PHQ-9 or PROMIS Depression (depression), PF-10 or PROMIS-PF (physical functioning), and PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Treatments and Medications (self-efficacy). The PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities met 68% of our criteria and might be considered for inclusion. Existing evidence and key informant data identified 5 candidate PROMs to use in primary care. These instruments can be used to develop PRO-PMs.
引用
收藏
页码:2687 / 2697
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intelligent Palliative Care Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Sandham, Margaret H.
    Hedgecock, Emma A.
    Siegert, Richard J.
    Narayanan, Ajit
    Hocaoglu, Mevhibe B.
    Higginson, Irene J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 63 (05) : 747 - 757
  • [32] Using Patient-reported Outcome Measures to Improve Health Care Time for a New Approach
    Browne, John P.
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Smith, Sarah
    MEDICAL CARE, 2017, 55 (10) : 901 - 904
  • [33] The critical role of mixed methods research in developing valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measures
    Howell, Martin
    Amir, Noa
    Guha, Chandana
    Manera, Karine
    Tong, Allison
    METHODS, 2022, 205 : 213 - 219
  • [34] Digitally enabled patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care
    Lindner, Oana C.
    Velikova, Galina
    Stark, Dan P.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (01): : E2 - E2
  • [35] Conscientious use of patient-reported outcome measures in supportive care
    Derek K. Smith
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023, 31
  • [36] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Hematology Cancer Care
    Kirkpatrick, Suriya
    Campbell, Karen
    Harding, Samantha
    Rudd, Sarah
    CANCER NURSING, 2024,
  • [37] Patient-Reported Outcomes (Pros) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Proms)
    Weldring, Theresa
    Smith, Sheree M. S.
    HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2013, 6 : 61 - 68
  • [38] Patient-reported outcome measures in depression
    a Steig, David Husdal
    Reinholt, Nina
    Christensen, Anne Bryde
    Hvenegaard Pedersen, Morten
    Arnfred, Sidse Marie
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 77 (02) : 212 - 219
  • [39] Patient-reported outcome measures in urology
    Narang, Gopal L.
    Pannell, Stephanie C.
    Laviana, Aaron A.
    Huen, Kathy H. Y.
    Izard, Jason
    Smith, Angela B.
    Bergman, Jonathan
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (04) : 366 - 374
  • [40] Collecting patient-reported outcome measures
    Ahern, Susannah
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Ackerman, Ilana N.
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2017, 47 (12) : 1454 - 1457