共 50 条
Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones
被引:22
|作者:
Tsuchida, Kouhei
[1
]
Iwasaki, Mari
[1
]
Tsubouchi, Misako
[1
]
Suzuki, Tsunehiro
[1
]
Tsuchida, Chieko
[1
]
Yoshitake, Naoto
[1
]
Sasai, Takako
[1
]
Hiraishi, Hideyuki
[1
]
机构:
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Mibu, Tochigi 3210293, Japan
来源:
关键词:
Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation;
Common bile duct stone;
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography;
MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPSY;
BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY;
DIFFICULT;
COMPLICATIONS;
MANAGEMENT;
REMOVAL;
PLUS;
CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS;
PANCREATITIS;
PAPILLOTOMY;
D O I:
10.1186/s12876-015-0290-6
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is currently recognized as the primary endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones. However, it is difficult to remove multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) common bile duct stones with EST alone. Recently, EST plus endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) was reported to be an effective treatment for such bile duct stones. We compared the results of EST and EST + EPLBD for multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) stones that were difficult to treat using EST alone. We also compared the complication rates between the techniques. Methods: Seventy patients with large (largest diameter, >= 15 mm) or >= 3 common bile duct stones treated in our department between April 2010 and March 2013 underwent EST + EPLBD (n = 34) or EST alone (n = 36). We compared final successful stone removal rates, rates of successful stone removal in the first session, procedure times, status of concurrent mechanical lithotripsy (ML), and complications between the EST + EPLBD and EST groups. Results: The rates of final successful stone removal were similar between the two groups (EST + EPLBD: 100 % vs. EST: 89 %; p = 0.115). The rate of successful stone removal in the first session was significantly higher in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 88 % vs. EST: 56 %; p = 0.03). Moreover, the procedure time was significantly shorter (EST + EPLBD: 42 min vs. EST: 67 min; p = 0.011) and the rate of ML use was significantly lower in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 50 % vs. EST: 94 %; p < 0.001). Complications like pancreatitis and bleeding occurred in three patients in the EST + EPLBD group and in 10 patients in the EST group, but the differences were not statistically significant (EST + EPLBD: 9 % vs. EST: 25 %; p = 0.112). Conclusions: Our results suggest that EST + EPLBD is an effective therapy for patients with difficult-to-treat multiple or large common bile duct stones, because it requires fewer sessions and shorter operative times than EST alone.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文