Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones

被引:22
|
作者
Tsuchida, Kouhei [1 ]
Iwasaki, Mari [1 ]
Tsubouchi, Misako [1 ]
Suzuki, Tsunehiro [1 ]
Tsuchida, Chieko [1 ]
Yoshitake, Naoto [1 ]
Sasai, Takako [1 ]
Hiraishi, Hideyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Mibu, Tochigi 3210293, Japan
来源
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation; Common bile duct stone; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPSY; BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY; DIFFICULT; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; PLUS; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; PANCREATITIS; PAPILLOTOMY;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-015-0290-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is currently recognized as the primary endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones. However, it is difficult to remove multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) common bile duct stones with EST alone. Recently, EST plus endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) was reported to be an effective treatment for such bile duct stones. We compared the results of EST and EST + EPLBD for multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) stones that were difficult to treat using EST alone. We also compared the complication rates between the techniques. Methods: Seventy patients with large (largest diameter, >= 15 mm) or >= 3 common bile duct stones treated in our department between April 2010 and March 2013 underwent EST + EPLBD (n = 34) or EST alone (n = 36). We compared final successful stone removal rates, rates of successful stone removal in the first session, procedure times, status of concurrent mechanical lithotripsy (ML), and complications between the EST + EPLBD and EST groups. Results: The rates of final successful stone removal were similar between the two groups (EST + EPLBD: 100 % vs. EST: 89 %; p = 0.115). The rate of successful stone removal in the first session was significantly higher in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 88 % vs. EST: 56 %; p = 0.03). Moreover, the procedure time was significantly shorter (EST + EPLBD: 42 min vs. EST: 67 min; p = 0.011) and the rate of ML use was significantly lower in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 50 % vs. EST: 94 %; p < 0.001). Complications like pancreatitis and bleeding occurred in three patients in the EST + EPLBD group and in 10 patients in the EST group, but the differences were not statistically significant (EST + EPLBD: 9 % vs. EST: 25 %; p = 0.112). Conclusions: Our results suggest that EST + EPLBD is an effective therapy for patients with difficult-to-treat multiple or large common bile duct stones, because it requires fewer sessions and shorter operative times than EST alone.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation following with an endoscopic sphincterotomy (EPLBD plus EST) for large or multiple common bile duct stones (CBDS)
    Yohei, Taniguchi
    Inokuma, Tetsuro
    Yukitaka, Yamashita
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 2 - 2
  • [42] Immediate or Interval Endoscopic Papillary Large-balloon Dilation after Limited Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Bile Duct Stone Removal
    Saito, Hirokazu
    Imamura, Haruo
    Matsushita, Ikuo
    Kakuma, Tatsuyuki
    Tada, Shuji
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 60 (17) : 2713 - 2718
  • [43] Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs sphincterotomy alone for removal of common bile duct stones
    Shi-Bin Guo
    Hua Meng
    Zhi-Jun Duan
    Chun-Yan Li
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (47) : 17962 - 17969
  • [44] Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs sphincterotomy alone for removal of common bile duct stones
    Guo, Shi-Bin
    Meng, Hua
    Duan, Zhi-Jun
    Li, Chun-Yan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (47) : 17962 - 17969
  • [45] Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Combined with Large Balloon Dilation for Removal of Large Bile Duct Stones
    Sakai, Yuji
    Tsuyuguchi, Toshio
    Sugiyama, Harutoshi
    Nishikawa, Takao
    Kurosawa, Jo
    Saito, Masayoshi
    Tawada, Katsunobu
    Mikata, Rintaro
    Tada, Motohisa
    Ishihara, Takeshi
    Yokosuka, Osamu
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 60 (121) : 58 - 64
  • [46] Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones
    Kang, Dae-Hwan
    Heo, Jeung-Ho
    Lee, Sun-Mi
    Kim, Gwang-HA
    Kim, Tae-Oh
    Heo, Jeung
    Song, Geun-Am
    Cho, Mong
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB217 - AB217
  • [47] Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones
    Kang, Dae Hwan
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 21 : A477 - A477
  • [48] Risk management for endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones: Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation
    Igarashi, Yoshinori
    Yasuda, Ichiro
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 19 : S40 - S43
  • [49] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the removal of bile duct stones
    Kim, Jin Hong
    Yang, Min Jae
    Hwang, Jae Chul
    Yoo, Byung Moo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (46) : 8580 - 8594
  • [50] Combined endoscopic large balloon dilation with limited sphincterotomy versus sole sphincterotomy for removal of large or multiple common bile duct stones
    Hossam Ibrahim Mohammed
    Ali Saad Eldin Nada
    Randa Mohamed Seddik
    Ahmed Ragab ElGazara
    Egyptian Liver Journal, 13