Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones

被引:22
|
作者
Tsuchida, Kouhei [1 ]
Iwasaki, Mari [1 ]
Tsubouchi, Misako [1 ]
Suzuki, Tsunehiro [1 ]
Tsuchida, Chieko [1 ]
Yoshitake, Naoto [1 ]
Sasai, Takako [1 ]
Hiraishi, Hideyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Mibu, Tochigi 3210293, Japan
来源
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation; Common bile duct stone; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPSY; BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY; DIFFICULT; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; PLUS; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; PANCREATITIS; PAPILLOTOMY;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-015-0290-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is currently recognized as the primary endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones. However, it is difficult to remove multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) common bile duct stones with EST alone. Recently, EST plus endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) was reported to be an effective treatment for such bile duct stones. We compared the results of EST and EST + EPLBD for multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) stones that were difficult to treat using EST alone. We also compared the complication rates between the techniques. Methods: Seventy patients with large (largest diameter, >= 15 mm) or >= 3 common bile duct stones treated in our department between April 2010 and March 2013 underwent EST + EPLBD (n = 34) or EST alone (n = 36). We compared final successful stone removal rates, rates of successful stone removal in the first session, procedure times, status of concurrent mechanical lithotripsy (ML), and complications between the EST + EPLBD and EST groups. Results: The rates of final successful stone removal were similar between the two groups (EST + EPLBD: 100 % vs. EST: 89 %; p = 0.115). The rate of successful stone removal in the first session was significantly higher in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 88 % vs. EST: 56 %; p = 0.03). Moreover, the procedure time was significantly shorter (EST + EPLBD: 42 min vs. EST: 67 min; p = 0.011) and the rate of ML use was significantly lower in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 50 % vs. EST: 94 %; p < 0.001). Complications like pancreatitis and bleeding occurred in three patients in the EST + EPLBD group and in 10 patients in the EST group, but the differences were not statistically significant (EST + EPLBD: 9 % vs. EST: 25 %; p = 0.112). Conclusions: Our results suggest that EST + EPLBD is an effective therapy for patients with difficult-to-treat multiple or large common bile duct stones, because it requires fewer sessions and shorter operative times than EST alone.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Significance of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Preceding Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation in the Management of Bile Duct Stones
    Mitsuru Okuno
    Takuji Iwashita
    Kensaku Yoshida
    Akinori Maruta
    Shinya Uemura
    Masanori Nakashima
    Tsuyoshi Mukai
    Nobuhiro Ando
    Keisuke Iwata
    Yohei Horibe
    Seiji Adachi
    Masatoshi Mabuchi
    Shinpei Doi
    Ichiro Yasuda
    Masahito Shimizu
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2016, 61 : 597 - 602
  • [32] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation after endoscopic sphincterotomy for treatment of large common bile duct stone
    Lee, DongKi
    Lee, ByungJun
    Hwhang, SungJun
    Baik, YongHan
    Lee, SeJun
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 19 : S52 - S56
  • [33] The efficacy of limited endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of large bile duct stones
    Chung-Mou Kuo
    Yi-Chun Chiu
    Chih-Ming Liang
    Cheng-Kun Wu
    Lung-Sheng Lu
    Wei-Chen Tai
    Yuan-Hung Kuo
    Keng-Liang Wu
    Seng-Kee Chuah
    Chung-Huang Kuo
    BMC Gastroenterology, 19
  • [34] Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation after sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones
    Ajmere, Niraj K.
    Ste, Ronald
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (09): : S504 - S504
  • [35] The efficacy of limited endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of large bile duct stones
    Kuo, Chung-Mou
    Chiu, Yi-Chun
    Liang, Chih-Ming
    Wu, Cheng-Kun
    Lu, Lung-Sheng
    Tai, Wei-Chen
    Kuo, Yuan-Hung
    Wu, Keng-Liang
    Chuah, Seng-Kee
    Kuo, Chung-Huang
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [36] Endoscopic sphincterotomy and papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones
    Toda, N
    Saito, K
    Wada, R
    Kawabe, T
    Shiratori, Y
    Mitsushima, T
    Omata, M
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 52 (63) : 700 - 704
  • [37] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones:A meta-analysis
    Piao-Piao Jin
    Jian-Feng Cheng
    Dan Liu
    Mei Mei
    Zhao-Qi Xu
    Lei-Min Sun
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (18) : 5548 - 5556
  • [38] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis
    Jin, Piao-Piao
    Cheng, Jian-Feng
    Liu, Dan
    Mei, Mei
    Xu, Zhao-Qi
    Sun, Lei-Min
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (18) : 5548 - 5556
  • [39] LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLARY LARGE-BALLOON DILATION FOR BILE DUCT STONES
    Murabayashi, Toji
    Kanno, Yoshihide
    Koshita, Shinsuke
    Ogawa, Takahisa
    Masu, Kaori
    Kusunose, Hiroaki
    Sakai, Toshitaka
    Yonamine, Keisuke
    Miyamoto, Kazuaki
    Kozakai, Fumisato
    Noda, Yutaka
    Ito, Kei
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB240 - AB240
  • [40] Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation With or Without Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones
    Wang, Jia
    Cao, Lichao
    Xue, Kuijin
    Qi, Peng
    Mao, Qingdong
    Cui, Mingjuan
    Ju, Hui
    He, Baoguo
    Cao, Bin
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2025, 70 (02) : 478 - 493