Comparison of the usefulness of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation with endoscopic sphincterotomy for large and multiple common bile duct stones

被引:22
|
作者
Tsuchida, Kouhei [1 ]
Iwasaki, Mari [1 ]
Tsubouchi, Misako [1 ]
Suzuki, Tsunehiro [1 ]
Tsuchida, Chieko [1 ]
Yoshitake, Naoto [1 ]
Sasai, Takako [1 ]
Hiraishi, Hideyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Mibu, Tochigi 3210293, Japan
来源
BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation; Common bile duct stone; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPSY; BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY; DIFFICULT; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; PLUS; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; PANCREATITIS; PAPILLOTOMY;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-015-0290-6
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is currently recognized as the primary endoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones. However, it is difficult to remove multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) common bile duct stones with EST alone. Recently, EST plus endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) was reported to be an effective treatment for such bile duct stones. We compared the results of EST and EST + EPLBD for multiple (>= 3) or large (>= 15 mm) stones that were difficult to treat using EST alone. We also compared the complication rates between the techniques. Methods: Seventy patients with large (largest diameter, >= 15 mm) or >= 3 common bile duct stones treated in our department between April 2010 and March 2013 underwent EST + EPLBD (n = 34) or EST alone (n = 36). We compared final successful stone removal rates, rates of successful stone removal in the first session, procedure times, status of concurrent mechanical lithotripsy (ML), and complications between the EST + EPLBD and EST groups. Results: The rates of final successful stone removal were similar between the two groups (EST + EPLBD: 100 % vs. EST: 89 %; p = 0.115). The rate of successful stone removal in the first session was significantly higher in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 88 % vs. EST: 56 %; p = 0.03). Moreover, the procedure time was significantly shorter (EST + EPLBD: 42 min vs. EST: 67 min; p = 0.011) and the rate of ML use was significantly lower in the EST + EPLBD group (EST + EPLBD: 50 % vs. EST: 94 %; p < 0.001). Complications like pancreatitis and bleeding occurred in three patients in the EST + EPLBD group and in 10 patients in the EST group, but the differences were not statistically significant (EST + EPLBD: 9 % vs. EST: 25 %; p = 0.112). Conclusions: Our results suggest that EST + EPLBD is an effective therapy for patients with difficult-to-treat multiple or large common bile duct stones, because it requires fewer sessions and shorter operative times than EST alone.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation alone without sphincterotomy for the treatment of large common bile duct stones
    Hoi-Hung Chan
    Kwok-Hung Lai
    Chiun-Ku Lin
    Wei-Lun Tsai
    E-Ming Wang
    Ping-I Hsu
    Wen-Chi Chen
    Hsien-Chung Yu
    Huay-Min Wang
    Feng-Woei Tsay
    Cheng-chung Tsai
    I-Shu Chen
    Yu-chia Chen
    Huei-Lung Liang
    Huay-Ben Pan
    BMC Gastroenterology, 11
  • [22] Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Associated With Sphincterotomy for Extraction of Large Bile Duct Stones
    Luz, Gustavo O.
    De Moura, Eduardo G.
    Meine, Gilmara C.
    Carneiro, Fred O.
    Medrado, Bruno F.
    Almeida, Maira R.
    Maluf-Filho, Fauze
    Lera, Marcos
    Ide, Edson
    Furuya, Carlos K.
    Chaves, Dalton M.
    Cheng, Spencer
    Matuguma, Sergio E.
    Tomishige, Toshiro
    Hondo, Fabio Y.
    Baracat, Renato
    Artifon, Everson L.
    Franzini, Tomazo
    Sakai, Paulo
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 400 - 401
  • [23] Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation for bile duct stones in super elderly patients
    Ishii, Tatsuya
    Uenoyama, Yoshito
    Ogawa, Satoshi
    Matsumoto, Hisakazu
    Yamashita, Yukitaka
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 30 : 237 - 237
  • [24] Small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation for removal of large common bile duct stones during ERCP
    Bo, Qian Jun
    Hua, Xu Li
    Min, Chen Tian
    Gen, Gu Liu
    Mei, Yang Yan
    Sheng, Lu Hua
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 29 (04) : 907 - 912
  • [25] Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large-balloon Dilation for Common Bile Duct Stones
    Murabayashi, Toji
    Kanno, Yoshihide
    Koshita, Shinsuke
    Ogawa, Takahisa
    Kusunose, Hiroaki
    Sakai, Toshitaka
    Masu, Kaori
    Yonamine, Keisuke
    Miyamoto, Kazuaki
    Kozakai, Fumisato
    Endo, Kazuki
    Noda, Yutaka
    Ito, Kei
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 59 (07) : 891 - 899
  • [26] LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF LIMITED ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY PLUS LARGE-BALLOON DILATION VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLARY LARGE-BALLOON DILATIONALONE FOR REMOVAL OF BILE DUCT STONES
    Li, Tao
    GUT, 2019, 68 : A139 - A140
  • [27] COMPARISON OF THE LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLARY LARGE-BALLOON DILATION ALONE VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR REMOVAL OF BILE DUCT STONES
    Yang, Wenying
    GUT, 2018, 67 : A103 - A103
  • [28] Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation with Minor Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in the Management of Difficult Bile Duct Stones
    Yoo, Kyo-Sang
    Kim, Su Jin
    Huh, Kyung Rim
    Lee, Kyung Hun
    Jeon, Gang
    Ha, Jun-Wook
    Kim, Kyoung Oh
    Park, Cheol Hee
    Hahn, Taeho
    Park, Sang Hoon
    Kim, Jong Hyeok
    Park, Choong Kee
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB154 - AB154
  • [29] Combined Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy and Large Balloon Dilation for Large Common Bile Duct Stones
    Carnes, Matthew
    Cotton, Peter B.
    Hawes, Robert H.
    Lawrence, Christopher
    Payne, Mark
    Romagnuolo, Joseph
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (05) : AB287 - AB287
  • [30] Significance of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Preceding Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation in the Management of Bile Duct Stones
    Okuno, Mitsuru
    Iwashita, Takuji
    Yoshida, Kensaku
    Maruta, Akinori
    Uemura, Shinya
    Nakashima, Masanori
    Mukai, Tsuyoshi
    Ando, Nobuhiro
    Iwata, Keisuke
    Horibe, Yohei
    Adachi, Seiji
    Mabuchi, Masatoshi
    Doi, Shinpei
    Yasuda, Ichiro
    Shimizu, Masahito
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2016, 61 (02) : 597 - 602