Auditory Brainstem Response Detection Using Machine Learning: A Comparison With Statistical Detection Methods

被引:9
|
作者
McKearney, Richard M. [1 ]
Bell, Steven L. [1 ]
Chesnaye, Michael A. [1 ]
Simpson, David M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Inst Sound & Vibrat Res, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2022年 / 43卷 / 03期
关键词
Auditory brainstem response; Evoked potentials; Objective detection methods; Machine learning; OBJECTIVE DETECTION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; CLASSIFICATION; TESTS; TIME;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000001151
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to train and test machine learning algorithms to be able to detect accurately whether EEG data contains an auditory brainstem response (ABR) or not and recommend suitable machine learning methods. In addition, the performance of the best machine learning algorithm was compared with that of prominent statistical detection methods. Design: Four machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using nested k-fold cross-validation: a random forest, a convolutional long short-term memory network, a stacked ensemble, and a multilayer perceptron. The best method was evaluated on a separate test set and compared with conventional detection methods: Fsp, Fmp, q-sample uniform scores test, and Hotelling's T-2 test. The models were trained and tested on simulated data that were generated based on recorded ABRs collected from 12 normal-hearing participants and no-stimulus EEG data from 15 participants. Simulation allowed the ground truth of the data ("response present" or "response absent") to be known. Results: The sensitivity of the best machine learning algorithm, a stacked ensemble, was significantly greater than that of the conventional detection methods evaluated. The stacked ensemble, evaluated using a bootstrap approach, consistently achieved a high and stable level of specificity across ensemble sizes. Conclusions: The stacked ensemble model presented was more effective than conventional statistical ABR detection methods and the alternative machine learning approaches tested. The stacked ensemble detection method may have potential both in automated ABR screening devices as well as in evoked potential software, assisting clinicians in making decisions regarding a patient's ABR threshold. Further assessment of the model's generalizability using a large cohort of subject recorded data, including participants of different ages and hearing status, is a recommended next step.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 960
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Novelty Detection in the Human Auditory Brainstem
    Slabu, Lavinia
    Grimm, Sabine
    Escera, Caries
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 32 (04): : 1447 - 1452
  • [32] COMPARISON OF AUDITORY-EVOKED POTENTIAL DETECTION METHODS USING SIGNAL-DETECTION-THEORY
    VALDESSOSA, MJ
    BOBES, MA
    PEREZABALO, MC
    PERERA, M
    CARBALLO, JA
    VALDESSOSA, P
    AUDIOLOGY, 1987, 26 (03): : 166 - 178
  • [33] Intelligent Model Based Fault Detection and Diagnosis for HVAC System Using Statistical Machine Learning Methods
    Guo, Ying
    Wall, Josh
    Li, Jiaming
    West, Sam
    2013 ASHRAE WINTER CONFERENCE, 2013,
  • [34] Newborn hearing screener based on automatic auditory brainstem response detection
    Aldonate, Julio
    Mercuri, Carlos
    Biurrun, Jose
    Reta, Juan Manuel
    Bonell, Claudia
    Gentiletti, Gerardo G.
    Escobar, Sergio
    Acevedo, Ruben
    BIODEVICES 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ELECTRONICS AND DEVICES, VOL 1, 2008, : 174 - +
  • [35] Detection of Intrusions with Machine Learning Methods
    Bostanci, Beyzanur
    Albayrak, Ahmet
    2ND INTERNATIONAL INFORMATICS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (IISEC), 2021,
  • [36] Measures of the binaural interaction component in human auditory brainstem response using objective detection criteria
    Brantberg, K
    Fransson, PA
    Hansson, H
    Rosenhall, U
    SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (01): : 15 - 26
  • [37] A comparison of the three-dimensional auditory brainstem response and the conventional auditory brainstem response in children
    Yasuhara, A
    Hori, A
    BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 24 (08): : 750 - 757
  • [38] Wearables and Detection of Falls: A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Sensors Positioning
    Arthur B. A. Pinto
    Gilda A. de Assis
    Luiz C. B. Torres
    Thomas Beltrame
    Diana M. G. Domingues
    Neural Processing Letters, 2022, 54 : 2165 - 2179
  • [39] Machine learning on difference image analysis: A comparison of methods for transient detection
    Sanchez, B.
    Dominguez R, M. J.
    Lares, M.
    Beroiz, M.
    Cabral, J. B.
    Gurovich, S.
    Quinones, C.
    Artola, R.
    Colazo, C.
    Schneiter, M.
    Girardini, C.
    Tornatore, M.
    Nilo Castellon, J. L.
    Garcia Lambas, D.
    Diaz, M. C.
    ASTRONOMY AND COMPUTING, 2019, 28
  • [40] Wearables and Detection of Falls: A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Sensors Positioning
    Pinto, Arthur B. A.
    de Assis, Gilda A.
    Torres, Luiz C. B.
    Beltrame, Thomas
    Domingues, Diana M. G.
    NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2022, 54 (03) : 2165 - 2179