Auditory Brainstem Response Detection Using Machine Learning: A Comparison With Statistical Detection Methods

被引:9
|
作者
McKearney, Richard M. [1 ]
Bell, Steven L. [1 ]
Chesnaye, Michael A. [1 ]
Simpson, David M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Inst Sound & Vibrat Res, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2022年 / 43卷 / 03期
关键词
Auditory brainstem response; Evoked potentials; Objective detection methods; Machine learning; OBJECTIVE DETECTION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; CLASSIFICATION; TESTS; TIME;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000001151
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to train and test machine learning algorithms to be able to detect accurately whether EEG data contains an auditory brainstem response (ABR) or not and recommend suitable machine learning methods. In addition, the performance of the best machine learning algorithm was compared with that of prominent statistical detection methods. Design: Four machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using nested k-fold cross-validation: a random forest, a convolutional long short-term memory network, a stacked ensemble, and a multilayer perceptron. The best method was evaluated on a separate test set and compared with conventional detection methods: Fsp, Fmp, q-sample uniform scores test, and Hotelling's T-2 test. The models were trained and tested on simulated data that were generated based on recorded ABRs collected from 12 normal-hearing participants and no-stimulus EEG data from 15 participants. Simulation allowed the ground truth of the data ("response present" or "response absent") to be known. Results: The sensitivity of the best machine learning algorithm, a stacked ensemble, was significantly greater than that of the conventional detection methods evaluated. The stacked ensemble, evaluated using a bootstrap approach, consistently achieved a high and stable level of specificity across ensemble sizes. Conclusions: The stacked ensemble model presented was more effective than conventional statistical ABR detection methods and the alternative machine learning approaches tested. The stacked ensemble detection method may have potential both in automated ABR screening devices as well as in evoked potential software, assisting clinicians in making decisions regarding a patient's ABR threshold. Further assessment of the model's generalizability using a large cohort of subject recorded data, including participants of different ages and hearing status, is a recommended next step.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 960
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Software Vulnerability Detection: A Comparison of Statistical and Machine Learning Algorithms
    Peerzada, Bareen
    Kumar, Deepak
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RELIABILITY QUALITY AND SAFETY ENGINEERING, 2025,
  • [12] Auditory brainstem response - A comparison of different interpretation strategies for detection of cerebellopontine angle tumors
    Stanton, SG
    Cashman, MZ
    SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1996, 25 (02): : 109 - 120
  • [13] Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Code Smell Detection Using Reduced Features
    Karaduzovic-Hadziabdic, Kanita
    Spahic, Rialda
    2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (UBMK), 2018, : 670 - 672
  • [14] A Comparison of Supervised Classification Methods for Auditory Brainstem Response Determination
    McCullagh, Paul
    Wang, Haiying
    Zheng, Huiru
    Lightbody, Gaye
    McAllister, Gerry
    MEDINFO 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH WORLD CONGRESS ON HEALTH (MEDICAL) INFORMATICS, PTS 1 AND 2: BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2007, 129 : 1289 - +
  • [15] The DDoS attacks detection through machine learning and statistical methods in SDN
    Afsaneh Banitalebi Dehkordi
    MohammadReza Soltanaghaei
    Farsad Zamani Boroujeni
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2021, 77 : 2383 - 2415
  • [16] The DDoS attacks detection through machine learning and statistical methods in SDN
    Dehkordi, Afsaneh Banitalebi
    Soltanaghaei, MohammadReza
    Boroujeni, Farsad Zamani
    JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2021, 77 (03): : 2383 - 2415
  • [17] Detection of child depression using machine learning methods
    Haque, Umme Marzia
    Kabir, Enamul
    Khanam, Rasheda
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (12):
  • [18] Medicare Fraud Detection using Machine Learning Methods
    Bauder, Richard A.
    Khoshgoftaar, Taghi M.
    2017 16TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS (ICMLA), 2017, : 858 - 865
  • [19] Detection DDOS Attacks Using Machine Learning Methods
    Aytac, Tugba
    Aydin, Muhammed Ali
    Zaim, Abdul Halim
    ELECTRICA, 2020, 20 (02): : 159 - 167
  • [20] Phishing URL detection using machine learning methods
    Ahammad, S. K. Hasane
    Kale, Sunil D.
    Upadhye, Gopal D.
    Pande, Sandeep Dwarkanath
    Babu, E. Venkatesh
    Dhumane, Amol, V
    Bahadur, Dilip Kumar Jang
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2022, 173