DECISION MAKING IN WATER RESOURCES WITH FUZZY INFORMATION

被引:0
|
作者
Tzimopoulos, C. [1 ]
Evangelides, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki Dept Rural & Surveing Engn, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
来源
GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL | 2011年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
multiple objectives optimization; fuzzy analysis; membership function; Nestos reservoirs; preferences(importance); SETS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The multiple objectives optimization in water resources planning consists in trading multiple and conflicting objectives, forming a complex and dynamic process. In the last four decades multiobjective decisions based on fuzzy sets have been evolved and considerable research spawned into the application of fuzzy subsets. Multiobjective decisions problems with uncertainty require: a) evaluating how well each alternative or choice satisfies each objective and b) combining the objectives into an overall objective or decision function D for the selection of the best alternative. In particular when one has a) a universe of n alternatives X={X-1, X-2,...X-n} and a set of p objectives (criteria) A={A(1),A(2),....A(p)} to be satisfied, the overall objective is D=A(1) and A2 and A(p), given by the intersection of all the objectives, D=A(1) boolean AND A(2) ..... boolean AND A(p) and one is seeking solutions satisfying D, with mu(D)(X*)=max(mu(D)(X)), where mu(D)(X) is the grade of membership that the decision function D has for each alternative. An application of the above theory concerns the decision of selecting the most appropriate from five dams and their corresponding reservoirs in Nestos watershed (Alternatives AB, AD, AR, BA, and MA). The criteria set is A= {A(1)=cost of the dam, A(2)=environmental impact, A(3)=Hydroelectric power production, A(4)=flood protection) and finally the importance set is: P= {b(1), b(2), b(3), b(4)}.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 324
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INFORMATION NEEDS FOR WATER-RESOURCES DECISION-MAKING
    SELLERS, J
    NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 1993, 17 (03) : 228 - 234
  • [2] Integrations of Continuous Hesitant Fuzzy Information in Group Decision Making With a Case Study of Water Resources Emergency Management
    Zhang, Shen
    Xu, Zeshui
    Zeng, Xiao-Jun
    Yan, Xin
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 146134 - 146144
  • [3] DECISION-MAKING IN FUZZY ENVIRONMENT FUZZY INFORMATION AND DECISION-MAKING
    TANAKA, H
    OKUDA, T
    ASAI, K
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1977, 15 (06) : 623 - 635
  • [4] Science and decision making for water resources
    Policansky, D
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1998, 8 (03) : 610 - 618
  • [5] INFORMATION RESOURCES AND PUBLIC DECISION-MAKING
    LAWS, D
    GROSS, M
    FABOS, JG
    PAPERS FROM THE 1989 ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE URBAN AND REGIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATION, VOL 4, 1989, : 160 - 174
  • [6] Stochastic-fuzzy multi criteria decision making for robust water resources management
    Zarghami, Mahdi
    Szidarovszky, Ferenc
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2009, 23 (03) : 329 - 339
  • [7] Comparison of fuzzy set ranking methods for implementation in water resources decision-making
    Prodanovic, P
    Simonovic, SP
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2002, 29 (05) : 692 - 701
  • [8] Stochastic-fuzzy multi criteria decision making for robust water resources management
    Mahdi Zarghami
    Ferenc Szidarovszky
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2009, 23 : 329 - 339
  • [9] Uncertain decision making under fuzzy information
    Song, Y.
    Wu, X.
    Zheng, Z.
    Chen, M.
    Huazhong Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal Huazhong (Central China) University of Science and Technology, 2001, 29 (10): : 37 - 40
  • [10] Decision making of project under fuzzy information
    Wang, Kuo-Shong
    Chi, Jen-Hao
    Wan, Eang-Hao
    Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Transactions of the Chinese Institute of Engineers,Series A/Chung-kuo Kung Ch'eng Hsuch K'an, 1993, 16 (04): : 533 - 541