DECISION MAKING IN WATER RESOURCES WITH FUZZY INFORMATION

被引:0
|
作者
Tzimopoulos, C. [1 ]
Evangelides, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki Dept Rural & Surveing Engn, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
来源
GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL | 2011年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
multiple objectives optimization; fuzzy analysis; membership function; Nestos reservoirs; preferences(importance); SETS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The multiple objectives optimization in water resources planning consists in trading multiple and conflicting objectives, forming a complex and dynamic process. In the last four decades multiobjective decisions based on fuzzy sets have been evolved and considerable research spawned into the application of fuzzy subsets. Multiobjective decisions problems with uncertainty require: a) evaluating how well each alternative or choice satisfies each objective and b) combining the objectives into an overall objective or decision function D for the selection of the best alternative. In particular when one has a) a universe of n alternatives X={X-1, X-2,...X-n} and a set of p objectives (criteria) A={A(1),A(2),....A(p)} to be satisfied, the overall objective is D=A(1) and A2 and A(p), given by the intersection of all the objectives, D=A(1) boolean AND A(2) ..... boolean AND A(p) and one is seeking solutions satisfying D, with mu(D)(X*)=max(mu(D)(X)), where mu(D)(X) is the grade of membership that the decision function D has for each alternative. An application of the above theory concerns the decision of selecting the most appropriate from five dams and their corresponding reservoirs in Nestos watershed (Alternatives AB, AD, AR, BA, and MA). The criteria set is A= {A(1)=cost of the dam, A(2)=environmental impact, A(3)=Hydroelectric power production, A(4)=flood protection) and finally the importance set is: P= {b(1), b(2), b(3), b(4)}.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 324
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aggregation operators for soft decision making in water resources
    Despic, O
    Simonovic, SP
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 115 (01) : 11 - 33
  • [22] Selection of India’s energy resources: a fuzzy decision making approach
    Sharma D.
    Vaish R.
    Azad S.
    Energy Systems, 2015, 6 (03) : 439 - 453
  • [23] Fuzzy multiobjective decision-making approach for groundwater resources management
    Kentel, Elcin
    Aral, Mustafa M.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2007, 12 (02) : 206 - 217
  • [24] Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making on water resources projects case study: Ranking water transfers to Zayanderud basin in Iran
    Zarghaami, Mahdi
    Ardakanian, Reza
    Memariani, Azizolah
    WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 32 (02) : 280 - 293
  • [25] On Information Fusion by Fuzzy Sets for Decision Making in Peer Review
    Wang, Lu
    Li, Genzi
    Dai, Yafei
    Fu, Xuefeng
    ACTA PHYSICO-CHIMICA SINICA, 2023, 39 (03)
  • [26] Models for multiple attribute decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy information
    Xu, Z. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2007, 15 (03) : 285 - 297
  • [27] Fuzzy Decision Making for Selection of Information System Development Approach
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Liu, Mai
    Takahara, Yasuhiko
    International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 1998, 9 (01): : 66 - 77
  • [28] Models for multiple attribute decision making with picture fuzzy information
    Liu, Hui
    Wang, Haiou
    Yuan, Yixuan
    Zhang, Caiming
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 37 (02) : 1973 - 1980
  • [29] On Decision Making under Fuzzy Information about an Uncontrolled Factor
    Ukhobotov, V. I.
    Stabulit, I. S.
    Kudryavtsev, K. N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS 2018 (INTELS'18), 2019, 150 : 524 - 531
  • [30] Integrated fuzzy decision-making model with incomplete information
    Chen, Shou-Yu
    Wang, Jian-Ming
    Fu, Guang-Tao
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2002, 17 (06): : 847 - 851