DECISION MAKING IN WATER RESOURCES WITH FUZZY INFORMATION

被引:0
|
作者
Tzimopoulos, C. [1 ]
Evangelides, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki Dept Rural & Surveing Engn, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
来源
GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL | 2011年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
multiple objectives optimization; fuzzy analysis; membership function; Nestos reservoirs; preferences(importance); SETS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The multiple objectives optimization in water resources planning consists in trading multiple and conflicting objectives, forming a complex and dynamic process. In the last four decades multiobjective decisions based on fuzzy sets have been evolved and considerable research spawned into the application of fuzzy subsets. Multiobjective decisions problems with uncertainty require: a) evaluating how well each alternative or choice satisfies each objective and b) combining the objectives into an overall objective or decision function D for the selection of the best alternative. In particular when one has a) a universe of n alternatives X={X-1, X-2,...X-n} and a set of p objectives (criteria) A={A(1),A(2),....A(p)} to be satisfied, the overall objective is D=A(1) and A2 and A(p), given by the intersection of all the objectives, D=A(1) boolean AND A(2) ..... boolean AND A(p) and one is seeking solutions satisfying D, with mu(D)(X*)=max(mu(D)(X)), where mu(D)(X) is the grade of membership that the decision function D has for each alternative. An application of the above theory concerns the decision of selecting the most appropriate from five dams and their corresponding reservoirs in Nestos watershed (Alternatives AB, AD, AR, BA, and MA). The criteria set is A= {A(1)=cost of the dam, A(2)=environmental impact, A(3)=Hydroelectric power production, A(4)=flood protection) and finally the importance set is: P= {b(1), b(2), b(3), b(4)}.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 324
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making with Hesitant Fuzzy Information
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Wang, Chao
    Tian, Xuedong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2015, 23 (03) : 459 - 480
  • [42] A Novel Approach to Decision-Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Information
    Naz, Sumera
    Ashraf, Samina
    Akram, Muhammad
    MATHEMATICS, 2018, 6 (06)
  • [43] Using decision analysis to include climate change in water resources decision making
    Hobbs, BJ
    Chao, PT
    Venkatesh, BN
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1997, 37 (01) : 177 - 202
  • [44] Using Decision Analysis to Include Climate Change in Water Resources Decision Making
    Benjamin F. Hobbs
    Philip T. Chao
    Boddu N. Venkatesh
    Climatic Change, 1997, 37 : 177 - 202
  • [45] Protecting soil and water resources through multiobjective decision making
    Prato, T
    Fulcher, C
    MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING FOR LAND, WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1998, : 385 - 394
  • [46] Optimal Utilization Simulation and Decision Making on Water Resources System
    Xue Lianqing
    Li Yongkun
    Fan Zhenghang
    Li Jieyou
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOL 12, PT B, 2012, 12 : 1097 - 1103
  • [47] Integration of reservoir volume estimates into water resources decision making
    Abu-Taleb, MF
    WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 28 (04) : 426 - 432
  • [48] Optimal Utilization Simulation and Decision Making on Water Resources System
    Xue Lianqing
    Li Yongkun
    Fan Zhenghang
    Li Jieyou
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND NEURAL COMPUTING (FSNC 2011), VOL II, 2011, : 521 - 524
  • [49] MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING IN WATER-RESOURCES
    HIPEL, KW
    WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN, 1992, 28 (01): : 3 - 12
  • [50] Analyzing and building information resources to support decision making in educational systems
    Pavlicheva, Elena N.
    NAUCHNYE I TEKHNICHESKIE BIBLIOTEKI-SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL LIBRARIES, 2024, (03): : 91 - 116