Randomized clinical trial of oral and intravenous versus intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis for laparoscopic colorectal resection

被引:52
|
作者
Ikeda, A. [1 ]
Konishi, T. [1 ]
Ueno, M. [1 ]
Fukunaga, Y. [1 ]
Nagayama, S. [1 ]
Fujimoto, Y. [1 ]
Akiyoshi, T. [1 ]
Yamaguchi, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, 3-8-31 Ariake Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
关键词
SURGICAL-SITE INFECTION; PERIOPERATIVE SELECTIVE DECONTAMINATION; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; DIGESTIVE-TRACT; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.10281
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of oral prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of surgical-site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is controversial. The aim of this RCT was to evaluate whether intravenous perioperative antibiotics are inferior to combined preoperative oral and perioperative intravenous antibiotics in this setting. Methods: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection in a single cancer centre were assigned randomly to combined preoperative oral antibiotics (metronidazole and kanamycin) and perioperative intravenous antibiotics (cefmetazole) (oral/IV group) or to perioperative intravenous antibiotics (cefmetazole) alone (IV-only group). Patients were stratified for the analyses based on type of operation (colonic surgery, anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection), preoperative use of mechanical bowel preparation, preoperative chemoradiotherapy and the presence of diabetes mellitus. The primary endpoint was the overall rate of SSI. Secondary endpoints were the rates of incisional site infection, organ/space infection, anastomotic leakage, intra-abdominal abscess, adverse events and postoperative complications. Results: Of 540 patients offered participation in the trial in 2013-2014, 515 agreed to take part and were randomized. Some 256 patients in the IV-only group and 255 in the oral/IV group completed the treatment per protocol. The overall rate of SSI was 7.8 per cent (20 of 256) in the IV-only group and 7.8 per cent (20 of 255) in the oral/IV group, confirming that perioperative administration of intravenous antibiotics alone was not inferior to the combined regimen (P = 0.017). There were no differences in rates of incisional site infection (5.5 versus 5.9 per cent respectively), organ/space infection (2.3 versus 2.0 per cent) or other secondary endpoints between the two groups. Conclusion: Intravenous perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis alone is not inferior to combined preoperative oral and intravenous perioperative prophylaxis with regard to SSI in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective laparoscopic resection. Registration number: UMIN000019339 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1615
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine Versus Intravenous Pethidine
    Ebrahimifard, Farzane
    Nooraei, Navid
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (01): : 88 - 92
  • [42] PROPHYLAXIS OF INFECTION WITH INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULINS PLUS ANTIBIOTIC FOR PATIENTS AT RISK FOR SEPSIS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIAL
    CAFIERO, F
    GIPPONI, M
    BONALUMI, U
    PICCARDO, A
    SGUOTTI, C
    CORBETTA, G
    SURGERY, 1992, 112 (01) : 24 - 31
  • [43] Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection
    Braga, M.
    Frasson, M.
    Zuliani, W.
    Vignali, A.
    Pecorelli, N.
    Di Carlo, V.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (08) : 1180 - 1186
  • [44] Comment on: Systemic versus oral and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (SOAP) study in colorectal surgery: prospective randomized multicentre trial
    Kirby, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (09) : E314 - E314
  • [45] Comment on: Systemic versus oral and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (SOAP) study in colorectal surgery: prospective randomized multicentre trial
    Zhou, Y.
    Huang, L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (12) : E413 - E413
  • [46] Intravenous, Oral, and the Combination of Intravenous and Oral Ramosetron for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
    Ryu, Jung-Hee
    Jeon, Young-Tae
    Hwang, Jung-Won
    Oh, A-Young
    Moon, Ji-Yeon
    Ro, Young-Jin
    Kim, Chong Soo
    Chen, Chen
    Apfel, Christian C.
    Do, Sang-Hwan
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 33 (09) : 1162 - 1172
  • [47] A randomized prospective study of oral versus intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis against postoperative infection after sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible
    Yoda, T
    Sakai, E
    Harada, K
    Mori, M
    Sakamoto, I
    Enomoto, S
    CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 46 (06) : 438 - 444
  • [48] A randomized prospective trial of oral versus intravenous ganciclovir for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in high-risk kidney recipients
    Nafar, M
    Pezeshki, ML
    Farrokhi, F
    Einollahi, B
    Pour-Reza-Gholi, F
    Firouzan, A
    Farhangi, S
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (07) : 3053 - 3055
  • [49] PROPHYLAXIS IN TRANSURETHRAL SURGERY - ORAL LOMEFLOXACIN VERSUS INTRAVENOUS CEFUROXIME
    MARTINLUENGO, F
    FONTANA, L
    RICO, JL
    TOMASROS, M
    MURCIA, A
    ROMERO, A
    METHODS AND FINDINGS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 15 (01): : 57 - 59
  • [50] Iron prophylaxis in pregnancy: Intravenous route versus oral route
    Bencaiova, Gabriela
    von Mandach, Ursula
    Zimmermann, Roland
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 144 (02) : 135 - 139