Randomized clinical trial of oral and intravenous versus intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis for laparoscopic colorectal resection

被引:52
|
作者
Ikeda, A. [1 ]
Konishi, T. [1 ]
Ueno, M. [1 ]
Fukunaga, Y. [1 ]
Nagayama, S. [1 ]
Fujimoto, Y. [1 ]
Akiyoshi, T. [1 ]
Yamaguchi, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, 3-8-31 Ariake Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
关键词
SURGICAL-SITE INFECTION; PERIOPERATIVE SELECTIVE DECONTAMINATION; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; DIGESTIVE-TRACT; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.10281
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of oral prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of surgical-site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is controversial. The aim of this RCT was to evaluate whether intravenous perioperative antibiotics are inferior to combined preoperative oral and perioperative intravenous antibiotics in this setting. Methods: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection in a single cancer centre were assigned randomly to combined preoperative oral antibiotics (metronidazole and kanamycin) and perioperative intravenous antibiotics (cefmetazole) (oral/IV group) or to perioperative intravenous antibiotics (cefmetazole) alone (IV-only group). Patients were stratified for the analyses based on type of operation (colonic surgery, anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection), preoperative use of mechanical bowel preparation, preoperative chemoradiotherapy and the presence of diabetes mellitus. The primary endpoint was the overall rate of SSI. Secondary endpoints were the rates of incisional site infection, organ/space infection, anastomotic leakage, intra-abdominal abscess, adverse events and postoperative complications. Results: Of 540 patients offered participation in the trial in 2013-2014, 515 agreed to take part and were randomized. Some 256 patients in the IV-only group and 255 in the oral/IV group completed the treatment per protocol. The overall rate of SSI was 7.8 per cent (20 of 256) in the IV-only group and 7.8 per cent (20 of 255) in the oral/IV group, confirming that perioperative administration of intravenous antibiotics alone was not inferior to the combined regimen (P = 0.017). There were no differences in rates of incisional site infection (5.5 versus 5.9 per cent respectively), organ/space infection (2.3 versus 2.0 per cent) or other secondary endpoints between the two groups. Conclusion: Intravenous perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis alone is not inferior to combined preoperative oral and intravenous perioperative prophylaxis with regard to SSI in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective laparoscopic resection. Registration number: UMIN000019339 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1615
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RANDOMIZED TRIAL TO COMPARE ORAL WITH PARENTERAL ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS IN ELECTIVE COLONIC RESECTION
    ARABI, Y
    KEIGHLEY, MRB
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1979, 66 (05) : 359 - 359
  • [32] Intravenous Dexketoprofen versus Intravenous Paracetamol for Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Serinken, Mustafa
    Eken, Cenker
    Karcioglu, Ozgur
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 35 (04) : 301 - 305
  • [33] Nitrous oxide versus intravenous sedation for anesthesia: A randomized clinical trial
    Thaxton, L.
    Pitotti, J.
    Espey, E.
    Teal, S.
    Sheeder, J.
    Singh, R.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 98 (04) : 332 - 333
  • [34] PARTIAL ORAL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT OF ENDOCARDITIS
    Shoaib, Hassan
    Amin, Fatima
    Butt, Sania
    INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 5 (09): : 9009 - 9016
  • [35] Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Matsui, Yoichi
    Satoi, Sohei
    Kaibori, Masaki
    Toyokawa, Hideyoshi
    Yanagimoto, Hiroaki
    Matsui, Kosuke
    Ishizaki, Morihiko
    Kwon, A-Hon
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [36] Partial Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis
    Iversen, Kasper
    Ihlemann, Nikolaj
    Gill, Sabine U.
    Madsen, Trine
    Elming, Hanne
    Jensen, Kaare T.
    Bruun, Niels E.
    Hofsten, Dan E.
    Fursted, Kurt
    Christensen, Jens J.
    Schultz, Martin
    Klein, Christine F.
    Fosboll, Emil L.
    Rosenvinge, Flemming
    Schonheyder, Henrik C.
    Kober, Lars
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    Helweg-Larsen, Jannik
    Tonder, Niels
    Moser, Claus
    Bundgaard, Henning
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 380 (05): : 415 - 424
  • [37] Oral versus intravenous rehydration of moderately dehydrated children: A randomized, controlled trial
    Spandorfer, PR
    Alessandrini, EA
    Joffe, MD
    Localio, R
    Shaw, KN
    PEDIATRICS, 2005, 115 (02) : 295 - 301
  • [38] Efficacy of 1 versus 3 days of intravenous amikacin as a prophylaxis for patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate: A prospective randomized trial
    Jayanth, Selvin Theodore
    Chandrasingh, J.
    Sahni, Rani Diana
    Mukha, Rajiv Paul
    Kumar, Santosh
    Devasia, Antony
    Kekre, Nitin Sudhakar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 37 (02) : 133 - 139
  • [39] A Randomized controlled trial of oral versus intravenous iron in chronic kidney disease
    Agarwal, Rajiv
    Rizkala, Adel R.
    Bastani, Bahar
    Kaskas, Marwan O.
    Leehey, David J.
    Besarab, Anatole
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 26 (05) : 445 - 454
  • [40] The effect of early switching from intravenous to oral antibiotic therapy: a randomized controlled trial
    Nguyen, Anh Dung
    Mai-Phan, Tuong-Anh
    Tran, Minh Hoang
    Pham, Hong Tham
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY & PHARMACOGNOSY RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (05): : 695 - 703