Randomized clinical trial of oral and intravenous versus intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis for laparoscopic colorectal resection

被引:52
|
作者
Ikeda, A. [1 ]
Konishi, T. [1 ]
Ueno, M. [1 ]
Fukunaga, Y. [1 ]
Nagayama, S. [1 ]
Fujimoto, Y. [1 ]
Akiyoshi, T. [1 ]
Yamaguchi, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, 3-8-31 Ariake Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
关键词
SURGICAL-SITE INFECTION; PERIOPERATIVE SELECTIVE DECONTAMINATION; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; DIGESTIVE-TRACT; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.10281
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of oral prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of surgical-site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is controversial. The aim of this RCT was to evaluate whether intravenous perioperative antibiotics are inferior to combined preoperative oral and perioperative intravenous antibiotics in this setting. Methods: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection in a single cancer centre were assigned randomly to combined preoperative oral antibiotics (metronidazole and kanamycin) and perioperative intravenous antibiotics (cefmetazole) (oral/IV group) or to perioperative intravenous antibiotics (cefmetazole) alone (IV-only group). Patients were stratified for the analyses based on type of operation (colonic surgery, anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection), preoperative use of mechanical bowel preparation, preoperative chemoradiotherapy and the presence of diabetes mellitus. The primary endpoint was the overall rate of SSI. Secondary endpoints were the rates of incisional site infection, organ/space infection, anastomotic leakage, intra-abdominal abscess, adverse events and postoperative complications. Results: Of 540 patients offered participation in the trial in 2013-2014, 515 agreed to take part and were randomized. Some 256 patients in the IV-only group and 255 in the oral/IV group completed the treatment per protocol. The overall rate of SSI was 7.8 per cent (20 of 256) in the IV-only group and 7.8 per cent (20 of 255) in the oral/IV group, confirming that perioperative administration of intravenous antibiotics alone was not inferior to the combined regimen (P = 0.017). There were no differences in rates of incisional site infection (5.5 versus 5.9 per cent respectively), organ/space infection (2.3 versus 2.0 per cent) or other secondary endpoints between the two groups. Conclusion: Intravenous perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis alone is not inferior to combined preoperative oral and intravenous perioperative prophylaxis with regard to SSI in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective laparoscopic resection. Registration number: UMIN000019339 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1615
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Patient Satisfaction with Oral versus Intravenous Sedation for Cataract Surgery A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Peeler, Crandall E.
    Villani, Catherine M.
    Fiorello, Marissa G.
    Lee, Hyunjoo J.
    Subramanian, Manju L.
    Desai, Manishi A.
    Siegel, Nicole H.
    Luther, Daniel J.
    Esparaz, Elizabeth S.
    Pira, Tony
    Eliassi, Babak
    Leidl, Matthew
    Ness, Steven
    Sekhar, Pavan
    Norris, Mark C.
    Mustafa, Wissam H.
    Zalewski, Stephen
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 126 (09) : 1212 - 1218
  • [12] Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Transcatheter Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: an Open Randomized Prospective Study of Oral Versus Intravenous Administration
    Ebisutani, Chikara
    Sato, Shuichi
    Nishi, Katsuhisa
    Inoue, Hiroshi
    Yoshie, Tomoo
    Kinoshita, Yoshikazu
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 49 (12) : 1059 - 1065
  • [13] Evaluation of antiemetic effect of intravenous palonosetron versus intravenous ondansetron in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial
    Laha, Baisakhi
    Hazra, Avijit
    Mallick, S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 45 (01) : 24 - 29
  • [14] Oral nifedipine versus intravenous labetalol in hypertensive urgencies and emergencies of pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial
    Lakshmi, B. Sathya
    Dasari, Papa
    OBSTETRIC MEDICINE, 2012, 5 (04) : 171 - 175
  • [15] Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic ultrasonography before laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection
    Ellebaek, S. B.
    Fristrup, C. W.
    Hovendal, C.
    Qvist, N.
    Bundgaard, L.
    Salomon, S.
    Stovring, J.
    Mortensen, M. B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (11) : 1462 - 1469
  • [16] Randomized trial of oral versus intravenous acetaminophen for postoperative pain control
    Hickman, Skip R.
    Mathieson, Kathleen M.
    Bradford, Lynne M.
    Garman, Casey D.
    Gregg, Richard W.
    Lukens, Douglas W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2018, 75 (06) : 367 - 375
  • [17] Oral versus intravenous sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates: a randomized trial
    Chetan, Chinmay
    Suryawanshi, Pradeep
    Patnaik, Suprabha
    Soni, Naharmal B.
    Rath, Chandra
    Pareek, Prince
    Gupta, Bhvya
    Garegrat, Reema
    Verma, Arjun
    Singh, Yogen
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [18] Intravenous versus oral iron for treatment of anemia in pregnancy - A randomized trial
    Al, RA
    Unlubilgin, E
    Kandemir, O
    Yalvac, S
    Cakir, L
    Haberal, A
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 106 (06): : 1335 - 1340
  • [19] Oral versus intravenous sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension in neonates: a randomized trial
    Chinmay Chetan
    Pradeep Suryawanshi
    Suprabha Patnaik
    Naharmal B. Soni
    Chandra Rath
    Prince Pareek
    Bhvya Gupta
    Reema Garegrat
    Arjun Verma
    Yogen Singh
    BMC Pediatrics, 22
  • [20] Long-term antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients: A multicenter, randomized trial of intravenous/oral, itraconazole versus, intravenous/oral fluconazole.
    Winston, DJ
    Maziarz, RT
    Chandrasekar, PH
    Lazarus, HM
    Goldman, M
    Leitz, G
    Territo, MC
    BLOOD, 2001, 98 (11) : 479A - 479A