Randomized clinical trial of oral and intravenous versus intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis for laparoscopic colorectal resection

被引:52
|
作者
Ikeda, A. [1 ]
Konishi, T. [1 ]
Ueno, M. [1 ]
Fukunaga, Y. [1 ]
Nagayama, S. [1 ]
Fujimoto, Y. [1 ]
Akiyoshi, T. [1 ]
Yamaguchi, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, 3-8-31 Ariake Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
关键词
SURGICAL-SITE INFECTION; PERIOPERATIVE SELECTIVE DECONTAMINATION; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; DIGESTIVE-TRACT; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.10281
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of oral prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of surgical-site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is controversial. The aim of this RCT was to evaluate whether intravenous perioperative antibiotics are inferior to combined preoperative oral and perioperative intravenous antibiotics in this setting. Methods: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection in a single cancer centre were assigned randomly to combined preoperative oral antibiotics (metronidazole and kanamycin) and perioperative intravenous antibiotics (cefmetazole) (oral/IV group) or to perioperative intravenous antibiotics (cefmetazole) alone (IV-only group). Patients were stratified for the analyses based on type of operation (colonic surgery, anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection), preoperative use of mechanical bowel preparation, preoperative chemoradiotherapy and the presence of diabetes mellitus. The primary endpoint was the overall rate of SSI. Secondary endpoints were the rates of incisional site infection, organ/space infection, anastomotic leakage, intra-abdominal abscess, adverse events and postoperative complications. Results: Of 540 patients offered participation in the trial in 2013-2014, 515 agreed to take part and were randomized. Some 256 patients in the IV-only group and 255 in the oral/IV group completed the treatment per protocol. The overall rate of SSI was 7.8 per cent (20 of 256) in the IV-only group and 7.8 per cent (20 of 255) in the oral/IV group, confirming that perioperative administration of intravenous antibiotics alone was not inferior to the combined regimen (P = 0.017). There were no differences in rates of incisional site infection (5.5 versus 5.9 per cent respectively), organ/space infection (2.3 versus 2.0 per cent) or other secondary endpoints between the two groups. Conclusion: Intravenous perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis alone is not inferior to combined preoperative oral and intravenous perioperative prophylaxis with regard to SSI in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective laparoscopic resection. Registration number: UMIN000019339 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1615
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intravenous Versus Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Efficacy for Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Karaca, A. Serdar
    Gundogdu, Haldun
    Ozdogan, Mehmet
    Ersoy, Eren
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S640 - S644
  • [2] Intravenous Versus Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Efficacy for Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    A. Serdar Karaca
    Haldun Gündoğdu
    Mehmet Özdoğan
    Eren Ersoy
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2015, 77 : 640 - 644
  • [3] Oral vs intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy - an exploratory trial
    Zurbuchen, Urte
    Ritz, Joerg-P.
    Lehmann, Kai S.
    Groene, Joern
    Heidari, Majid
    Buhr, Heinz J.
    Germer, Christoph-T.
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2008, 393 (04) : 479 - 485
  • [4] Oral vs intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy—an exploratory trial
    Urte Zurbuchen
    Joerg-P. Ritz
    Kai S. Lehmann
    Joern Groene
    Majid Heidari
    Heinz J. Buhr
    Christoph-T. Germer
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2008, 393
  • [5] Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intravenous Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Alone with Oral and Intravenous Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for the Prevention of a Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Minako Kobayashi
    Yasuhiko Mohri
    Hitoshi Tonouchi
    Chikao Miki
    Keiji Nakai
    Masato Kusunoki
    Surgery Today, 2007, 37 : 383 - 388
  • [6] Randomized clinical trial comparing intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis alone with oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of a surgical site infection in colorectal cancer surgery
    Kobayashi, Minako
    Mohri, Yasuhiko
    Tonouchi, Hitoshi
    Miki, Chikao
    Nakai, Keiji
    Kusunoki, Masato
    SURGERY TODAY, 2007, 37 (05) : 383 - 388
  • [7] Randomized clinical trial of preoperative oral versus intravenous iron in anaemic patients with colorectal cancer
    Keeler, B. D.
    Simpson, J. A.
    Ng, O.
    Padmanabhan, H.
    Brookes, M. J.
    Acheson, A. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (03) : 214 - 221
  • [8] Randomized trial of oral versus sequential intravenous/oral antibiotic for acute pyelonephritis in children
    Bocquet, N.
    Alaoui, A. Sergent
    Jais, J. -P.
    Gajdos, V.
    Guigonis, V.
    Lacour, B.
    Cheron, G.
    ANNALES FRANCAISES DE MEDECINE D URGENCE, 2012, 2 (06): : 372 - 377
  • [9] A randomized clinical trial of oral versus intravenous methylprednisolone for relapse of MS
    Ramo-Tello, C.
    Grau-Lopez, L.
    Tintore, M.
    Rovira, A.
    Ramio i Torrenta, L.
    Brieva, L.
    Cano, A.
    Carmona, O.
    Saiz, A.
    Torres, F.
    Giner, P.
    Nos, C.
    Massuet, A.
    Montalban, X.
    Martinez-Caceres, E.
    Costa, J.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (06) : 717 - 725
  • [10] Patient Satisfaction in Oral versus Intravenous Sedation for Vitrectomies: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Subramanian, Manju L.
    Fiorello, Marissa
    Kim, Jiwoo
    Vig, Viha
    Ness, Steven D.
    Siegel, Nicole
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)