Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer

被引:24
|
作者
Shabat, Shay [2 ]
Miller, Larry E. [1 ,3 ]
Block, Jon E. [1 ]
Gepstein, Reuven [2 ]
机构
[1] Jon E Block PhD Inc, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Sapir Med Ctr, Spinal Care Unit, Kefar Sava, Israel
[3] Miller Sci Consulting Inc, Biltmore Lake, NC USA
来源
关键词
Superion; axial pain; extremity pain; PROCESS DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; X-STOP DEVICE; LOW-BACK-PAIN; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; HEALTH SURVEY; IMPLANT; MULTICENTER; DISABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/CIA.S23656
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel, minimally invasive interspinous spacer in patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: A total of 53 patients (mean age, 70 +/- 11 years; 45% female) with intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate LSS, confirmed on imaging studies, were treated with the Superion (R) Interspinous Spacer (VertiFlex, Inc, San Clemente, CA) and returned for follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Study endpoints included axial and extremity pain severity with an 11-point numeric scale, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), back function with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), health-related quality of life with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-12, and adverse events. Results: Axial and extremity pain each decreased 54% (both P < 0.001) over the 2-year follow-up period. ZCQ symptom severity scores improved 43% (P < 0.001) and ZCQ physical function improved 44% (P < 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years post-treatment. A statistically significant 50% improvement (P < 0.001) also was noted in back function. PCS and MCS each improved 40% (both P, 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years. Clinical success rates at 2 years were 83%-89% for ZCQ subscores, 75% for ODI, 78% for PCS, and 80% for MCS. No device infection, implant breakage, migration, or pull-out was observed, although two (3.8%) patients underwent explant with subsequent laminectomy. Conclusion: Moderate LSS can be effectively treated with a minimally invasive interspinous spacer. This device is appropriate for select patients who have failed nonoperative treatment measures for LSS and meet strict anatomical criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 233
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interspinous implant in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort
    Bhadra, Arup Kumar
    Raman, A. S.
    Tucker, S.
    Noordeen, H. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2008, 18 (07): : 489 - 493
  • [42] Comparison analysis of safety outcomes and the rate of subsequent spinal procedures between interspinous spacer without decompression versus minimally invasive lumbar decompression
    Rosner, Howard L.
    Tran, Oth
    Vajdi, Tina
    Vijjeswarapu, Mary A.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2024, 49 (01) : 30 - 35
  • [43] Clinical Results of 10-mm Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Interlaminar Decompression in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Simple Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Li, Pengfei
    Shi, Zhen
    Jiang, Yunduo
    Peng, Zhibin
    Wang, Yansong
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2023, 18 : 911 - 919
  • [44] Intraoperative Myelography in Minimally Invasive Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Pao, Jwo-Luen
    Wang, Jaw-Lin
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2012, 25 (05): : E96 - E103
  • [45] Minimally Invasive Decompression and Physiotherapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Geriatric Patients
    Hoffman, Haydn
    Bennett, Shelley S.
    Li, Charles H.
    Haakana, Piia
    Lu, Daniel C.
    CUREUS, 2018, 10 (06):
  • [46] Analysis of complications of minimally invasive approaches for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis
    Mekhail, Nagy
    Costandi, Shrif
    Botros, Mina
    Mukhdomi, Junaid
    Yassa, Peter
    Mukhdomi, Taif
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [47] Is minimally invasive surgery superior to open surgery for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review
    Ng, Karen Ka Man
    Cheung, Jason Pui Yin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2017, 25 (02): : 1 - 11
  • [48] The MIST Guidelines: The Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Consensus Group Guidelines for Minimally Invasive Spine Treatment
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Grider, Jay S.
    Pope, Jason E.
    Falowski, Steven
    Lamer, Tim J.
    Calodney, Aaron
    Provenzano, David A.
    Sayed, Dawood
    Lee, Eric
    Wahezi, Sayed E.
    Kim, Chong
    Hunter, Corey
    Gupta, Mayank
    Benyamin, Rasmin
    Chopko, Bohdan
    Demesmin, Didier
    Diwan, Sudhir
    Gharibo, Christopher
    Kapural, Leo
    Kloth, David
    Klagges, Brian D.
    Harned, Michael
    Simopoulos, Tom
    McJunkin, Tory
    Carlson, Jonathan D.
    Rosenquist, Richard W.
    Lubenow, Timothy R.
    Mekhail, Nagy
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2019, 19 (03) : 250 - 274
  • [49] INTERSPINOUS SPACER VERSUS LAMINECTOMY FOR LUMBAR STENOSIS: A COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS STUDY
    Sarmiento, J. M.
    Patil, C. G.
    Mukherjee, D.
    Nuno, M.
    Boakye, M.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 61 (01) : 149 - 149
  • [50] Superion® InterSpinous Spacer for treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: durable three-year results of a randomized controlled trial
    Patel, Vikas V.
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Whang, Peter G.
    Haley, Thomas R.
    Bradley, W. Daniel
    Davis, Raphael P.
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2015, 8 : 657 - 662