Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer

被引:24
|
作者
Shabat, Shay [2 ]
Miller, Larry E. [1 ,3 ]
Block, Jon E. [1 ]
Gepstein, Reuven [2 ]
机构
[1] Jon E Block PhD Inc, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Sapir Med Ctr, Spinal Care Unit, Kefar Sava, Israel
[3] Miller Sci Consulting Inc, Biltmore Lake, NC USA
来源
关键词
Superion; axial pain; extremity pain; PROCESS DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; X-STOP DEVICE; LOW-BACK-PAIN; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; HEALTH SURVEY; IMPLANT; MULTICENTER; DISABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/CIA.S23656
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel, minimally invasive interspinous spacer in patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: A total of 53 patients (mean age, 70 +/- 11 years; 45% female) with intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate LSS, confirmed on imaging studies, were treated with the Superion (R) Interspinous Spacer (VertiFlex, Inc, San Clemente, CA) and returned for follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Study endpoints included axial and extremity pain severity with an 11-point numeric scale, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), back function with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), health-related quality of life with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-12, and adverse events. Results: Axial and extremity pain each decreased 54% (both P < 0.001) over the 2-year follow-up period. ZCQ symptom severity scores improved 43% (P < 0.001) and ZCQ physical function improved 44% (P < 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years post-treatment. A statistically significant 50% improvement (P < 0.001) also was noted in back function. PCS and MCS each improved 40% (both P, 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years. Clinical success rates at 2 years were 83%-89% for ZCQ subscores, 75% for ODI, 78% for PCS, and 80% for MCS. No device infection, implant breakage, migration, or pull-out was observed, although two (3.8%) patients underwent explant with subsequent laminectomy. Conclusion: Moderate LSS can be effectively treated with a minimally invasive interspinous spacer. This device is appropriate for select patients who have failed nonoperative treatment measures for LSS and meet strict anatomical criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 233
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities on Access to Interspinous Spacer for Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Nationwide Medicare Analysis
    Cho, Annie M.
    Tran, Oth
    McGovern, Alysha M.
    Chan, Kheng Sze
    Yong, Robert Jason
    JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES, 2024,
  • [22] Beyond Epidurals: Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Hussaini, Zohra
    PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2021, 22 (02) : 237 - 237
  • [23] Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Narrative Review
    Yuan, Hongjie
    Yi, Xiaobin
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2023, 16 : 3707 - 3724
  • [24] Clinical study of minimally invasive endoscopic lumbar spinal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Chu, Haikun
    Pang, Bin
    Qin, Xiangzheng
    Liu, Yanqun
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 125 : 316 - 317
  • [25] A minimally invasive lumbar decompression procedure after an interspinous spacer device implantation: an uncommon order of treatment with a successful outcome
    Poliwoda, Salomon
    Noor, Nazir
    Urits, Ivan
    Viswanath, Omar
    Gonzalez, Christian
    Kaye, Alan D.
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [26] Interspinous Process Decompression: Expanding Treatment Options for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Shamie, A. Nick
    Blumenthal, Scott L.
    Orndorff, Douglas
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [27] The Use of Vertiflex® Interspinous Spacer Device in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Concurrent Medical Comorbidities
    Hartman, Jason
    Granville, Michelle
    Jacobson, Robert E.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (08)
  • [28] Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer in Spinal-Canal-Stenosis Treatment: Pros and Cons
    Zini, Chiara
    Bellini, Matteo
    Masala, Salvatore
    Marcia, Stefano
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2019, 55 (07):
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer
    Parker, Scott L.
    Anderson, Louise H.
    Nelson, Teresa
    Patel, Vikas V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2015, 9
  • [30] Superion Interspinous Process Spacer for Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication Secondary to Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Patel, Vikas V.
    Whang, Peter G.
    Haley, Thomas R.
    Bradley, W. Daniel
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Davis, Raphael P.
    Miller, Larry E.
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (05) : 275 - 282