Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer

被引:24
|
作者
Shabat, Shay [2 ]
Miller, Larry E. [1 ,3 ]
Block, Jon E. [1 ]
Gepstein, Reuven [2 ]
机构
[1] Jon E Block PhD Inc, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Sapir Med Ctr, Spinal Care Unit, Kefar Sava, Israel
[3] Miller Sci Consulting Inc, Biltmore Lake, NC USA
来源
关键词
Superion; axial pain; extremity pain; PROCESS DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; X-STOP DEVICE; LOW-BACK-PAIN; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; HEALTH SURVEY; IMPLANT; MULTICENTER; DISABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/CIA.S23656
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel, minimally invasive interspinous spacer in patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: A total of 53 patients (mean age, 70 +/- 11 years; 45% female) with intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate LSS, confirmed on imaging studies, were treated with the Superion (R) Interspinous Spacer (VertiFlex, Inc, San Clemente, CA) and returned for follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Study endpoints included axial and extremity pain severity with an 11-point numeric scale, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), back function with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), health-related quality of life with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-12, and adverse events. Results: Axial and extremity pain each decreased 54% (both P < 0.001) over the 2-year follow-up period. ZCQ symptom severity scores improved 43% (P < 0.001) and ZCQ physical function improved 44% (P < 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years post-treatment. A statistically significant 50% improvement (P < 0.001) also was noted in back function. PCS and MCS each improved 40% (both P, 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years. Clinical success rates at 2 years were 83%-89% for ZCQ subscores, 75% for ODI, 78% for PCS, and 80% for MCS. No device infection, implant breakage, migration, or pull-out was observed, although two (3.8%) patients underwent explant with subsequent laminectomy. Conclusion: Moderate LSS can be effectively treated with a minimally invasive interspinous spacer. This device is appropriate for select patients who have failed nonoperative treatment measures for LSS and meet strict anatomical criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 233
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Podichetty, Vinod K.
    Spears, John
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    Booher, John
    Biscup, Robert S.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2006, 19 (03): : 161 - 166
  • [32] Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Minimally Invasive Treatment with Bilateral Transpedicular Facet Augmentation System
    Masala, Salvatore
    Tarantino, Umberto
    Nano, Giovanni
    Iundusi, Riccardo
    Fiori, Roberto
    Da Ros, Valerio
    Simonetti, Giovanni
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (03) : 738 - 747
  • [33] Minimally invasive surgery through endoscopic laminotomy and foraminotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Polikandriotis, John A.
    Hudak, Elizabeth M.
    Perry, Michael W.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 10 (01) : 13 - 16
  • [34] Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Minimally Invasive Treatment with Bilateral Transpedicular Facet Augmentation System
    Salvatore Masala
    Umberto Tarantino
    Giovanni Nano
    Riccardo Iundusi
    Roberto Fiori
    Valerio Da Ros
    Giovanni Simonetti
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2013, 36 : 738 - 747
  • [35] The Impact of Age on the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Mekhail, Nagy A.
    Costandi, Shrif J.
    Armanyous, Sherif
    Vallejo, Ricardo
    Poree, Lawrence R.
    Brown, Lora L.
    Golovac, Stanley
    Deer, Timothy R.
    MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (13): : 151 - 161
  • [36] Interspinous implant in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort
    Arup Kumar Bhadra
    A. S. Raman
    S. Tucker
    H. H. Noordeen
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2008, 18 : 489 - 493
  • [37] Interspinous Distraction in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Neurophysiological Perspective
    Schizas, Constantin
    Pralong, Etienne
    Tzioupis, Christopher
    Kulik, Gerit
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (24) : 2113 - 2117
  • [38] Interspinous Spacer Implant in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Miller, Larry E.
    Block, Jon E.
    PAIN RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 2012
  • [39] Surgical Treatment of Lateral Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Using Percutaneous Interspinous Implant
    Mruzek, M.
    Palecek, T.
    Lipina, R.
    CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2015, 78 (02) : 167 - 171
  • [40] Superion Interspinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-Year Results
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Patel, Vikas V.
    Orndorff, Douglas G.
    Lavelle, William F.
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 104 : 279 - 283