Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer

被引:24
|
作者
Shabat, Shay [2 ]
Miller, Larry E. [1 ,3 ]
Block, Jon E. [1 ]
Gepstein, Reuven [2 ]
机构
[1] Jon E Block PhD Inc, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Sapir Med Ctr, Spinal Care Unit, Kefar Sava, Israel
[3] Miller Sci Consulting Inc, Biltmore Lake, NC USA
来源
关键词
Superion; axial pain; extremity pain; PROCESS DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; X-STOP DEVICE; LOW-BACK-PAIN; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; HEALTH SURVEY; IMPLANT; MULTICENTER; DISABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/CIA.S23656
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel, minimally invasive interspinous spacer in patients with moderate lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: A total of 53 patients (mean age, 70 +/- 11 years; 45% female) with intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate LSS, confirmed on imaging studies, were treated with the Superion (R) Interspinous Spacer (VertiFlex, Inc, San Clemente, CA) and returned for follow-up visits at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years. Study endpoints included axial and extremity pain severity with an 11-point numeric scale, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), back function with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), health-related quality of life with the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-12, and adverse events. Results: Axial and extremity pain each decreased 54% (both P < 0.001) over the 2-year follow-up period. ZCQ symptom severity scores improved 43% (P < 0.001) and ZCQ physical function improved 44% (P < 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years post-treatment. A statistically significant 50% improvement (P < 0.001) also was noted in back function. PCS and MCS each improved 40% (both P, 0.001) from pre-treatment to 2 years. Clinical success rates at 2 years were 83%-89% for ZCQ subscores, 75% for ODI, 78% for PCS, and 80% for MCS. No device infection, implant breakage, migration, or pull-out was observed, although two (3.8%) patients underwent explant with subsequent laminectomy. Conclusion: Moderate LSS can be effectively treated with a minimally invasive interspinous spacer. This device is appropriate for select patients who have failed nonoperative treatment measures for LSS and meet strict anatomical criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 233
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding the value of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: the case of interspinous spacer devices
    Tapp, Stephanie J.
    Martin, Brook I.
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Weinstein, Milton C.
    Deyo, Richard A.
    Mirza, Sohail K.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (04): : 584 - 592
  • [2] Rationale, design and clinical performance of the Superion® Interspinous Spacer: a minimally invasive implant for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Loguidice, Vito
    Bini, Walter
    Shabat, Shay
    Miller, Larry E.
    Block, Jon E.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2011, 8 (04) : 419 - 426
  • [3] A Novel Classification and Minimally Invasive Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Gu, Guangfei
    Zhang, Hailong
    He, Shisheng
    Fu, Qingsong
    Cai, Xiaobing
    Zhou, Xu
    Shen, Xiaolong
    Gu, Xin
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 26 (02) : 260 - 267
  • [4] Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Lawrence, Melinda M.
    Hayek, Salim M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 26 (05) : 573 - 579
  • [5] Minimally invasive lumbar decompression for the treatment of spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine
    Deer, Timothy
    PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2012, 2 (05) : 457 - 465
  • [6] Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression and Interspinous Process Device for the Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Literature Review
    Merkow, Justin
    Varhabhatla, Narayana
    Manchikanti, Laxmaiah
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Urman, Richard D.
    Yong, R. Jason
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2020, 24 (04)
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression and Interspinous Process Device for the Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Literature Review
    Justin Merkow
    Narayana Varhabhatla
    Laxmaiah Manchikanti
    Alan D. Kaye
    Richard D. Urman
    R. Jason Yong
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2020, 24
  • [8] Treatment of dynamic spinal canal stenosis with an interspinous spacer
    Siepe, Christoph J.
    Heider, Franziska
    Beisse, Rudolf
    Mayer, H. Michael
    Korge, Andreas
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2010, 22 (5-6): : 524 - 535
  • [9] A new ceramic interspinous process spacer for lumbar spinal canal stenosis
    Yano, Shunsuke
    Hida, Kazutoshi
    Seki, Toshitaka
    Aoyama, Takeshi
    Akino, Minoru
    Iwasaki, Yoshinobu
    NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 63 (01) : 108 - 113
  • [10] Stand-alone interspinous spacer versus decompressive laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Lauryssen, Carl
    Jackson, Robert J.
    Baron, Jeffrey M.
    Tallarico, Richard A.
    Lavelle, William F.
    Deutsch, Harel
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (06) : 763 - 769