Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Chlamydia trachomatis Vaccine Program in Adolescent Girls in the United States

被引:4
|
作者
Ditkowsky, Jared [1 ]
Rahman, Afsana [1 ]
Hammerschlag, Margaret R. [1 ]
Kohlhoff, Stephan [1 ]
Smith-Norowitz, Tamar A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Div Infect Dis, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
关键词
adolescent girls; Chlamydia trachomatis; Chlamydia trachomatis vaccination program; SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; PREGNANT-WOMEN; VAGINAL SWABS; GONORRHEA;
D O I
10.1093/jpids/pix072
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background. With >1.4 million cases in the United States reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2012, Chlamydia trachomatis infection is a major public health concern. We examined the impact of a C trachomatis vaccination program using a decision-analysis model to estimate the effects of vaccination on C trachomatis-associated costs and morbidity. Methods. We developed a Markov model considering a cohort of 2 158 117 US females aged 9 to 26 years. Morbidity, death, and healthcare-associated costs associated with chlamydial infection of mothers and fetuses/neonates were calculated over a 17-year time frame. We developed 2 major comparison arms, namely, a C trachomatis vaccination program and no C trachomatis vaccination program. Base-case efficacy and coverage were set to those of human papillomavirus in the United States with all variables, including efficacy and coverage, ranged in sensitivity analyses. Results. On the basis of a base-case analysis, a vaccination program would cost an estimated $710 million for a cohort of 2 158 117 women over a 17-year period, an increase of $41 million over having no vaccination program. A vaccination program would prevent 34 000 cases of C trachomatis infection and 5976 cases of pelvic inflammatory disease. Conclusions. A C trachomatis vaccination program results in increased cost to the healthcare system but averts significant morbidity and death.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 302
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-benefit Analysis of the Coping and Promoting Strength Program
    Slade, Eric P.
    Ginsburg, Golda S.
    Riddle, Mark A.
    PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2021, 22 (08) : 1096 - 1107
  • [22] Cost-benefit Analysis of the Coping and Promoting Strength Program
    Eric P. Slade
    Golda S. Ginsburg
    Mark A. Riddle
    Prevention Science, 2021, 22 : 1096 - 1107
  • [23] Cost-benefit analysis of the National Immunization Program in Spain
    Perez, Alberto
    Prada, Maria Fernandez
    Cassinello, Natalia
    Vallejo-Aparicio, Laura Amanda
    Garcia, Andrea
    Gonzalez, Almudena
    Duran, Ana
    Zozaya, Neboa
    Fernandez, Irene
    Daheron, Mathilde
    Hidalgo, Alvaro
    Beck, Ekkehard
    Garcia Ruiz, Antonio
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [24] Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Support Program for Nursing Staff
    Moran, Dane
    Wu, Albert W.
    Connors, Cheryl
    Chappidi, Meera R.
    Sreedhara, Sushama K.
    Selter, Jessica H.
    Padula, William V.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2020, 16 (04) : E250 - E254
  • [25] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND SOCIAL WELFARE PROGRAM EVALUATION
    LEVINE, AS
    SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 1968, 42 (02) : 173 - 183
  • [26] A cost-benefit analysis of Colorado's oxyfuels program
    Duggan, TE
    EXPERIMENTING WITH FREER MARKETS: LESSONS FROM THE LAST 20 YEARS AND PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE - VOL 2, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 501 - 510
  • [27] Cost-benefit analysis
    Miura, Grant
    NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 903 - 903
  • [28] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BJORNSTAD, P
    KJEMI, 1975, 35 (10): : 3 - 3
  • [29] A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures
    Mark G. Stewart
    John Mueller
    Journal of Transportation Security, 2008, 1 (3) : 143 - 159
  • [30] Concern raised over control of cost-benefit research in United States
    Webster, Paul Christopher
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (02) : E127 - E128