Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Chlamydia trachomatis Vaccine Program in Adolescent Girls in the United States

被引:4
|
作者
Ditkowsky, Jared [1 ]
Rahman, Afsana [1 ]
Hammerschlag, Margaret R. [1 ]
Kohlhoff, Stephan [1 ]
Smith-Norowitz, Tamar A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Div Infect Dis, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
关键词
adolescent girls; Chlamydia trachomatis; Chlamydia trachomatis vaccination program; SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; PREGNANT-WOMEN; VAGINAL SWABS; GONORRHEA;
D O I
10.1093/jpids/pix072
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background. With >1.4 million cases in the United States reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2012, Chlamydia trachomatis infection is a major public health concern. We examined the impact of a C trachomatis vaccination program using a decision-analysis model to estimate the effects of vaccination on C trachomatis-associated costs and morbidity. Methods. We developed a Markov model considering a cohort of 2 158 117 US females aged 9 to 26 years. Morbidity, death, and healthcare-associated costs associated with chlamydial infection of mothers and fetuses/neonates were calculated over a 17-year time frame. We developed 2 major comparison arms, namely, a C trachomatis vaccination program and no C trachomatis vaccination program. Base-case efficacy and coverage were set to those of human papillomavirus in the United States with all variables, including efficacy and coverage, ranged in sensitivity analyses. Results. On the basis of a base-case analysis, a vaccination program would cost an estimated $710 million for a cohort of 2 158 117 women over a 17-year period, an increase of $41 million over having no vaccination program. A vaccination program would prevent 34 000 cases of C trachomatis infection and 5976 cases of pelvic inflammatory disease. Conclusions. A C trachomatis vaccination program results in increased cost to the healthcare system but averts significant morbidity and death.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 302
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-benefit analysis for China's Grain for Green Program
    Xian, Junli
    Xia, Chengqi
    Cao, Shixiong
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 151 (151)
  • [42] Predicting adolescent risk behavior using a personalized cost-benefit analysis
    Moore, S
    Gullone, E
    JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE, 1996, 25 (03) : 343 - 359
  • [43] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF POSTPARTUM VACCINATION OF BIRTH MOTHERS WITH INFLUENZA VACCINE
    Ding, Y.
    Hay, J. W.
    Zangwill, K. M.
    Yeh, S. H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (03) : A117 - A117
  • [44] The cost-benefit framework and perceptions of decision strategies - A comparison of China and the United States
    Chu, P. C.
    Spires, Eric E.
    JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 39 (03) : 303 - 308
  • [45] The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It
    Flyvbjerg, Bent
    Bester, Dirk W.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2021, 12 (03) : 395 - 419
  • [46] Is There Evidence of the New Variant Chlamydia trachomatis in the United States?
    Won, Helen
    Ramachandran, Padmini
    Steece, Richard
    Van Der Pol, Barbara
    Moncada, Jeanne
    Schachter, Julius
    Gaydos, Charlotte
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2013, 40 (05) : 352 - 353
  • [47] Beware the cost-benefit analysis
    Spence, Des
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [48] Cost-Benefit Analysis in Reasoning
    Alaoui, Larbi
    Penta, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, : 881 - 925
  • [49] Incommensurability and cost-benefit analysis
    Adler, M
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1998, 146 (05) : 1371 - 1418
  • [50] In Defence of Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Ergas, Henry
    AGENDA-A JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND REFORM, 2009, 16 (03) : 31 - 40