A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures

被引:0
|
作者
Mark G. Stewart
John Mueller
机构
[1] The University of Newcastle,Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability
[2] Ohio State University,Mershon Center for International Security Studies and Department of Political Science
关键词
Terrorism; Security; Risk; Cost-benefit analysis; Aviation;
D O I
10.1007/s12198-008-0013-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper seeks to discover whether aviation security measures are cost-effective by considering their effectiveness, their cost and expected lives saved as a result of such expenditure. An assessment of the Federal Air Marshal Service suggests that the annual cost is $180 million per life saved. This is greatly in excess of the regulatory safety goal (societal willingness to pay to save a life) of $1–$10 million per life saved. As such, the air marshal program fails a cost-benefit analysis. In addition, the opportunity cost of these expenditures is considerable, and it is highly likely that far more lives would have been saved if the money had been invested instead in a wide range of more cost-effective risk mitigation programs. On the other hand, hardening of cockpit doors has an annual cost of only $800,00 per life saved, showing that this is a cost-effective security measure.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 159
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures
    Stewart, Mark G.
    Mueller, John
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SECURITY, 2008, 1 (03) : 143 - 159
  • [2] A Risk and Cost-Benefit Assessment of Australian Aviation Security Measures
    Stewart, Mark G.
    Mueller, John
    SECURITY CHALLENGES, 2008, 4 (03) : 45 - 61
  • [3] Terrorism Risks and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Aviation Security
    Stewart, Mark G.
    Mueller, John
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2013, 33 (05) : 893 - 908
  • [4] Risk-Based Cost-Benefit Analysis for Security Assessment Problems
    Wyss, Gregory D.
    Clem, John F.
    Darby, John L.
    Dunphy-Guzman, Katherine
    Hinton, John P.
    Mitchiner, Kim W.
    44TH ANNUAL 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CARNAHAN CONFERENCE ON SECURITY TECHNOLOGY, 2010, : 286 - 295
  • [5] Cost-benefit assessment: the United Kingdom experience
    Richmond, J
    PROGRESS IN THE REDUCTION, REFINEMENT AND REPLACEMENT OF ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2000, 31 : 821 - 827
  • [6] A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Lipid Standardization in the United States
    Hoerger, Thomas J.
    Wittenborn, John S.
    Young, Walter
    PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2011, 8 (06):
  • [7] The development of an aviation risk assessment model which allows cost benefit analysis of safety measures
    Roelen, ALC
    Pedrali, M
    Hayes, P
    Mariton, TL
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 1551 - 1556
  • [8] Aviation Security in the United States
    Jenkins, Brian M.
    TERRORISM AND POLITICAL VIOLENCE, 1998, 10 (03) : 101 - +
  • [9] The origin of cost-benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States
    Jiang, Wei
    Marggraf, Rainer
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [10] Concern raised over control of cost-benefit research in United States
    Webster, Paul Christopher
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (02) : E127 - E128