A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures

被引:0
|
作者
Mark G. Stewart
John Mueller
机构
[1] The University of Newcastle,Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability
[2] Ohio State University,Mershon Center for International Security Studies and Department of Political Science
关键词
Terrorism; Security; Risk; Cost-benefit analysis; Aviation;
D O I
10.1007/s12198-008-0013-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper seeks to discover whether aviation security measures are cost-effective by considering their effectiveness, their cost and expected lives saved as a result of such expenditure. An assessment of the Federal Air Marshal Service suggests that the annual cost is $180 million per life saved. This is greatly in excess of the regulatory safety goal (societal willingness to pay to save a life) of $1–$10 million per life saved. As such, the air marshal program fails a cost-benefit analysis. In addition, the opportunity cost of these expenditures is considerable, and it is highly likely that far more lives would have been saved if the money had been invested instead in a wide range of more cost-effective risk mitigation programs. On the other hand, hardening of cockpit doors has an annual cost of only $800,00 per life saved, showing that this is a cost-effective security measure.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 159
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost of Aviation Infrastructure in the United States
    Karlsson, Joakim
    Odoni, Amedeo
    Gaudet, Megan Brett
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2008, (2052) : 28 - 36
  • [32] Assessing security measures reducing terrorist risk: inverse ex post cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses of Norwegian airports and seaports
    Akhtar, Juned
    Bjornskau, Torkel
    Veisten, Knut
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SECURITY, 2010, 3 (03) : 179 - 195
  • [33] Cost-Benefit Analyses of Mitigation Measures Aimed at Reducing Collisions with Large Ungulates in the United States and Canada: a Decision Support Tool
    Huijser, Marcel P.
    Duffield, John W.
    Clevenger, Anthony P.
    Ament, Robert J.
    McGowen, Pat T.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2009, 14 (02):
  • [34] COST-BENEFIT BILLS PROGRESS IN KEY STATES
    不详
    CHEMICAL WEEK, 1995, 156 (19) : 56 - 56
  • [35] Security attribute evaluation method: A cost-benefit approach
    Butler, SA
    ICSE 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2002, : 232 - 240
  • [36] A methodology for cost-benefit analysis of information security technologies
    Zeng, Wen
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2019, 31 (07):
  • [37] Assessment of the Programme of Measures for Coastal Lagoon Environmental Restoration Using Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Martinez-Paz, Jose M.
    Perni, Angel
    Martinez-Carrasco, Federico
    EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2013, 21 (02) : 131 - 148
  • [38] Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Chlamydia trachomatis Vaccine Program in Adolescent Girls in the United States
    Ditkowsky, Jared
    Rahman, Afsana
    Hammerschlag, Margaret R.
    Kohlhoff, Stephan
    Smith-Norowitz, Tamar A.
    JOURNAL OF THE PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY, 2018, 7 (04) : 296 - 302
  • [39] AME SEMINAR PROGRAM IN UNITED-STATES - GENESIS, GOALS, AND COST-BENEFIT REFLECTIONS
    BRADFIELD, JY
    HARRIS, JL
    AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1977, 48 (04): : 366 - 368
  • [40] Toward a cost-benefit analysis of quality programs in digital forensic laboratories in the United States
    Hughes, Nicolas
    Ziemak, Erika
    Martinez, Carisa
    Stout, Peter
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS: FORENSIC SCIENCE, 2022, 4 (01):