Outcomes of 1-Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:19
|
作者
Colatruglio, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Flanigan, David C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Long, Joseph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
DiBartola, Alex C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Magnussen, Robert A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sports Med Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, OSU Sports Med Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2021年 / 49卷 / 03期
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; revision; 1-stage; 2-stage; outcomes; ONE-STAGE; SURGERY; TENDINOPATHY;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520923090
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common orthopaedic sports medicine procedure, but graft failure is not uncommon and often leads to revision ACLR. Revision surgery can be performed in a 1- or 2-stage fashion. Hypothesis: Graft failure risk, patient-reported outcomes, and anterior knee laxity are similar after 1- and 2-stage revision ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate patient outcomes after 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR. A search was performed with the phrase "revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" across Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and SportDiscus from the beginning of their archives through July 12, 2019. Results: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria and included 524 patients: 319 patients who underwent 1-stage revision ACLR and 205 patients who underwent 2-stage revision ACLR. Two studies compared outcomes of 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR; 4 studies reported outcomes after 2-stage revision ACLR; and the remaining 7 studies documented outcomes after 1-stage ACLR. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years. The 2 studies that compared 1- versus 2-stage ACLR reported no differences in functional, radiologic, or patient-reported outcomes or failure risk. Overall, 9 studies reported subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores; 4 studies, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score values; 8 studies, Lysholm scores; and 7 studies, Tegner scores; 8 studies measured anterior laxity with a KT-1000 arthrometer. The mean weighted subjective IKDC score for all studies including this outcome at final follow-up was 66.6 for 1-stage revisions and 65.9 for 2-stage revisions. Conclusion: The available evidence comparing 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR is retrospective and limited. The results of each approach are similar in appropriately selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 804
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Greater return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction compared with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lumban-Gaol, Imelda
    Putramega, Dananjaya
    Phatama, Krisna Yuarno
    Utomo, Dwikora Novembri
    Budhiparama, Nicolaas C.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025, 12 (01)
  • [42] REVISION ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION - REVIEW
    GOBLE, EM
    ARTHROSCOPY, 1994, 10 (02): : 153 - 155
  • [43] Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Pang, Long
    Li, Pengcheng
    Li, Tao
    Li, Yinghao
    Zhu, Jing
    Tang, Xin
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [44] Vancomycin presoak reduces infection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Mingwei
    Zhang, Yifan
    Shang, Guangqian
    Guo, Jianjun
    Xu, Hao
    Ma, Xue
    Yang, Xue
    Xiang, Shuai
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [45] Vertical Jump Testing after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dutaillis, Benjamin
    Diamond, Laura e.
    Lazarczuk, Stephanie l.
    Timmins, Ryan g.
    Bourne, Matthew n.
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2024, 56 (02) : 181 - 192
  • [46] Graft salvage following infected anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Kursumovic, K.
    Charalambous, C. P.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2016, 98B (05): : 608 - 615
  • [47] Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Relationship With Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Prodromidis, Apostolos D.
    Drosatou, Chrysoula
    Thivaios, Georgios C.
    Zreik, Nasri
    Charalambous, Charalambos P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (09): : 2551 - 2562
  • [48] Hamstrings Neuromuscular Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    David A. Sherman
    Neal R. Glaviano
    Grant E. Norte
    Sports Medicine, 2021, 51 : 1751 - 1769
  • [49] The efficacy of platelet rich plasma on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lv, Zheng-Tao
    Zhang, Jin-Ming
    Pang, Zhi-Ying
    Wang, Zhe
    Huang, Jun-Ming
    Zhu, Wen-Tao
    PLATELETS, 2022, 33 (02) : 229 - 241
  • [50] The effects of proprioceptive training on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Jiang
    Zhang, Di
    Zhao, Tianyu
    Liu, Xiaoxiao
    Wang, Ju
    Zheng, Hui
    Jin, Song
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 35 (04) : 506 - 521