Outcomes of 1-Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:19
|
作者
Colatruglio, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Flanigan, David C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Long, Joseph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
DiBartola, Alex C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Magnussen, Robert A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sports Med Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, OSU Sports Med Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2021年 / 49卷 / 03期
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; revision; 1-stage; 2-stage; outcomes; ONE-STAGE; SURGERY; TENDINOPATHY;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520923090
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common orthopaedic sports medicine procedure, but graft failure is not uncommon and often leads to revision ACLR. Revision surgery can be performed in a 1- or 2-stage fashion. Hypothesis: Graft failure risk, patient-reported outcomes, and anterior knee laxity are similar after 1- and 2-stage revision ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate patient outcomes after 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR. A search was performed with the phrase "revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" across Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and SportDiscus from the beginning of their archives through July 12, 2019. Results: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria and included 524 patients: 319 patients who underwent 1-stage revision ACLR and 205 patients who underwent 2-stage revision ACLR. Two studies compared outcomes of 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR; 4 studies reported outcomes after 2-stage revision ACLR; and the remaining 7 studies documented outcomes after 1-stage ACLR. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years. The 2 studies that compared 1- versus 2-stage ACLR reported no differences in functional, radiologic, or patient-reported outcomes or failure risk. Overall, 9 studies reported subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores; 4 studies, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score values; 8 studies, Lysholm scores; and 7 studies, Tegner scores; 8 studies measured anterior laxity with a KT-1000 arthrometer. The mean weighted subjective IKDC score for all studies including this outcome at final follow-up was 66.6 for 1-stage revisions and 65.9 for 2-stage revisions. Conclusion: The available evidence comparing 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR is retrospective and limited. The results of each approach are similar in appropriately selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 804
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patellar tendon versus artificial grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fan, DingYuan
    Ma, Jia
    Zhang, Lei
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [22] Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mohammed S. Alomari
    Abdullah A. Ghaddaf
    Ahmed S. Abdulhamid
    Mohammed S. Alshehri
    Mujeeb Ashraf
    Hatem H. Alharbi
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2022, 56 : 1669 - 1684
  • [23] PRP does not improve the objective outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    André Luís Lugnani de Andrade
    Amanda Veiga Sardeli
    Thiago Alves Garcia
    Bruno Livani
    William Dias Belangero
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2021, 29 : 3049 - 3058
  • [24] Correction to: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with concomitant meniscal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes
    Mohamed Sarraj
    Ryan P. Coughlin
    Max Solow
    Seper Ekhtiari
    Nicole Simunovic
    Aaron J. Krych
    Peter MacDonald
    Olufemi R. Ayeni
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2019, 27 : 3453 - 3453
  • [25] Sex-Specific Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mok, Anthony C.
    Fancher, Andrew J.
    Vopat, Matthew L.
    Baker, Jordan
    Tarakemeh, Armin
    Mullen, Scott
    Schroeppel, John P.
    Templeton, Kim
    Mulcahey, Mary K.
    Vopat, Bryan G.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (02)
  • [26] Effect of the Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Clinical and Stability Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lee, Yong Seuk
    Lee, O-Sung
    Lee, Seung Hoon
    Hui, Teo Seow
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (02): : 592 - 602
  • [27] PRP does not improve the objective outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Andrade, Andre Luis Lugnani
    Sardeli, Amanda Veiga
    Garcia, Thiago Alves
    Livani, Bruno
    Belangero, William Dias
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2021, 29 (09) : 3049 - 3058
  • [28] Outcome of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Wright, Rick W.
    Gill, Corey S.
    Chen, Ling
    Brophy, Robert H.
    Matava, Matthew J.
    Smith, Matthew V.
    Mall, Nathan A.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 94A (06): : 531 - 536
  • [29] Biomechanical Effects of Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kelly, Shayne R.
    Cutter, Brendan M.
    Huish, Eric G., Jr.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (06)
  • [30] Effects of remnant preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Huanyu
    Fu, Zicai
    Zhong, Mingjin
    Deng, Zhenhan
    Wang, Chen
    Sun, Yijia
    Zhu, Weimin
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9