Outcomes of 1-Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:19
|
作者
Colatruglio, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Flanigan, David C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Long, Joseph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
DiBartola, Alex C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Magnussen, Robert A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sports Med Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, OSU Sports Med Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2021年 / 49卷 / 03期
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; revision; 1-stage; 2-stage; outcomes; ONE-STAGE; SURGERY; TENDINOPATHY;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520923090
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common orthopaedic sports medicine procedure, but graft failure is not uncommon and often leads to revision ACLR. Revision surgery can be performed in a 1- or 2-stage fashion. Hypothesis: Graft failure risk, patient-reported outcomes, and anterior knee laxity are similar after 1- and 2-stage revision ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate patient outcomes after 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR. A search was performed with the phrase "revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" across Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and SportDiscus from the beginning of their archives through July 12, 2019. Results: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria and included 524 patients: 319 patients who underwent 1-stage revision ACLR and 205 patients who underwent 2-stage revision ACLR. Two studies compared outcomes of 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR; 4 studies reported outcomes after 2-stage revision ACLR; and the remaining 7 studies documented outcomes after 1-stage ACLR. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years. The 2 studies that compared 1- versus 2-stage ACLR reported no differences in functional, radiologic, or patient-reported outcomes or failure risk. Overall, 9 studies reported subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores; 4 studies, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score values; 8 studies, Lysholm scores; and 7 studies, Tegner scores; 8 studies measured anterior laxity with a KT-1000 arthrometer. The mean weighted subjective IKDC score for all studies including this outcome at final follow-up was 66.6 for 1-stage revisions and 65.9 for 2-stage revisions. Conclusion: The available evidence comparing 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR is retrospective and limited. The results of each approach are similar in appropriately selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 804
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Failure modes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Xiaoke
    Yan, Lei
    Li, Dijun
    Fan, Zijuan
    Liu, Haifeng
    Wang, Guishan
    Jiu, Jingwei
    Yang, Ziquan
    Li, Jiao Jiao
    Wang, Bin
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (03) : 719 - 734
  • [32] Failure modes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaoke Li
    Lei Yan
    Dijun Li
    Zijuan Fan
    Haifeng Liu
    Guishan Wang
    Jingwei Jiu
    Ziquan Yang
    Jiao Jiao Li
    Bin Wang
    International Orthopaedics, 2023, 47 : 719 - 734
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of early versus delayed reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Ai-Feng
    Guo, Tian-Ci
    Yu, Wei-Jie
    Chen, Ji-Xin
    Zhai, Jing -Bo
    KNEE, 2023, 44 : 43 - 58
  • [34] Quadriceps Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Tan, Tze Khiang
    Subramaniam, Arjun Gopal
    Ebert, Jay R.
    Radic, Ross
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (14): : 3974 - 3986
  • [35] Irradiated allograft versus autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis and systematic review of prospective studies
    Wang, Hong-De
    Zhu, Yan-Bin
    Wang, Tian-Rui
    Zhang, Wei-Fei
    Zhang, Ying-Ze
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 49 : 45 - 55
  • [36] Early Surgical Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation for Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Dahduli, Omar S.
    AlHossan, Abdullah M.
    Al Rushud, Mohammed A.
    Alneghaimshi, Muath M.
    Alotaibi, Saad F.
    AlNour, Mohammed K.
    Al Otaibi, Abdulrhman H.
    AlAseeri, Ali
    AlBatati, Saud
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [37] Is reconstruction the best management strategy for anterior cruciate ligament rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus non-operative treatment
    Smith, T. O.
    Postle, K.
    Penny, F.
    McNamara, I.
    Mann, C. J. V.
    KNEE, 2014, 21 (02): : 462 - 470
  • [38] Comparative clinical outcomes of anterolateral ligament reconstruction versus lateral extra-articular tenodesis in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ra, Ho Jong
    Kim, Jun-Ho
    Lee, Dae-Hee
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (07) : 923 - 931
  • [39] Comparative clinical outcomes of anterolateral ligament reconstruction versus lateral extra-articular tenodesis in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ho Jong Ra
    Jun-Ho Kim
    Dae-Hee Lee
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2020, 140 : 923 - 931
  • [40] Transtibial Versus Independent Drilling Techniques for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression
    Riboh, Jonathan C.
    Hasselblad, Vic
    Godin, Jonathan A.
    Mather, Richard C., III
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (11): : 2693 - 2702