Outcomes of 1-Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:19
|
作者
Colatruglio, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Flanigan, David C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Long, Joseph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
DiBartola, Alex C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Magnussen, Robert A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Sports Med Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, OSU Sports Med Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43202 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2021年 / 49卷 / 03期
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; revision; 1-stage; 2-stage; outcomes; ONE-STAGE; SURGERY; TENDINOPATHY;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520923090
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common orthopaedic sports medicine procedure, but graft failure is not uncommon and often leads to revision ACLR. Revision surgery can be performed in a 1- or 2-stage fashion. Hypothesis: Graft failure risk, patient-reported outcomes, and anterior knee laxity are similar after 1- and 2-stage revision ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate patient outcomes after 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR. A search was performed with the phrase "revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" across Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and SportDiscus from the beginning of their archives through July 12, 2019. Results: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria and included 524 patients: 319 patients who underwent 1-stage revision ACLR and 205 patients who underwent 2-stage revision ACLR. Two studies compared outcomes of 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR; 4 studies reported outcomes after 2-stage revision ACLR; and the remaining 7 studies documented outcomes after 1-stage ACLR. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years. The 2 studies that compared 1- versus 2-stage ACLR reported no differences in functional, radiologic, or patient-reported outcomes or failure risk. Overall, 9 studies reported subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores; 4 studies, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score values; 8 studies, Lysholm scores; and 7 studies, Tegner scores; 8 studies measured anterior laxity with a KT-1000 arthrometer. The mean weighted subjective IKDC score for all studies including this outcome at final follow-up was 66.6 for 1-stage revisions and 65.9 for 2-stage revisions. Conclusion: The available evidence comparing 1- versus 2-stage revision ACLR is retrospective and limited. The results of each approach are similar in appropriately selected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 804
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes After 1-Stage Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Mitchell, Justin J.
    Chahla, Jorge
    Dean, Chase S.
    Cinque, Mark
    Matheny, Lauren M.
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (08): : 1790 - 1798
  • [2] Clinical Outcomes in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis
    Mohan, Rohith
    Webster, Kate E.
    Johnson, Nick R.
    Stuart, Michael J.
    Hewett, Timothy E.
    Krych, Aaron J.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (01): : 289 - 300
  • [3] Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tunnel Aperture Overlap Determines Need for 1-Versus 2-Stage Revision: Setting the Stage
    Miller, Mark D.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2021, 37 (04): : 1233 - 1234
  • [4] Outpatient versus inpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Ferrari, Deisi
    Lopes, Thiago J. A.
    Franca, Paulo F. A.
    Azevedo, Fabio M.
    Pappas, Evangelos
    KNEE, 2017, 24 (02): : 197 - 206
  • [5] Clinical outcomes of combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Diego Ariel de Lima
    Lana Lacerda de Lima
    Nayara Gomes Reis de Souza
    Rodrigo Amorim de Moraes Perez
    Marcel Faraco Sobrado
    Tales Mollica Guimarães
    Camilo Partezani Helito
    Knee Surgery & Related Research, 33
  • [6] Clinical outcomes of combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Lima, Diego Ariel
    de Lima, Lana Lacerda
    Reis de Souza, Nayara Gomes
    de Moraes Perez, Rodrigo Amorim
    Sobrado, Marcel Faraco
    Guimaraes, Tales Mollica
    Helito, Camilo Partezani
    KNEE SURGERY & RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 33 (01)
  • [7] GRAFTS FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Andrez, Tassio Navajas
    Chagas, Julia Bezerra Martins
    D'Oliveira, Livia Baptista
    ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2022, 30 (06):
  • [8] After revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, who returns to sport? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Grassi, Alberto
    Zaffagnini, Stefano
    Muccioli, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani
    Neri, Maria Pia
    Della Villa, Stefano
    Marcacci, Maurilio
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (20) : 1295 - 1304
  • [9] Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhao, Di
    Pan, Jian-ke
    Lin, Fang-zheng
    Luo, Ming-hui
    Liang, Gui-hong
    Zeng, Ling-feng
    Huang, He-tao
    Han, Yan-hong
    Xu, Nan-jun
    Yang, Wei-yi
    Liu, Jun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (11): : 3053 - 3075
  • [10] Early versus delayed surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Toby O. Smith
    Leigh Davies
    Caroline B. Hing
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2010, 18 : 304 - 311